Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post Reply
Pure Canadian
Fledgling
Posts: 199
Joined: Nov 27th, 2009, 9:33 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by Pure Canadian »

realagen wrote:As someone suggested, the rules are there (but they could definitely use some tweaking): however, We need a body to enforce them more diligently.


Are you starting that new thread on improvements to the legislation?
realagen
Fledgling
Posts: 110
Joined: Nov 4th, 2008, 9:44 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by realagen »

I mentioned earlier that perhaps we could set something up. I'm not too certain of the process, however. Perhaps we could have an intervention by the moderator on this. If the topic of "campaign financial irregularities" is dead, I would certainly like to see some debate on the particular electoral by-laws that need revision, as well as new ones that could be added. I believe Mr. Finnis has supplied us with a list of the established Task Force that should be more than delighted to hear from us. If we can get enough bloggers to contribute ideas it might prove itself a useful exercise--at least more so than the futile argument going on about 9/11 :127:
What do you think, JO ?
Logitack
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 14212
Joined: Aug 12th, 2009, 7:13 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by Logitack »

realagen wrote:I mentioned earlier that perhaps we could set something up. I'm not too certain of the process, however. Perhaps we could have an intervention by the moderator on this. If the topic of "campaign financial irregularities" is dead, I would certainly like to see some debate on the particular electoral by-laws that need revision, as well as new ones that could be added. I believe Mr. Finnis has supplied us with a list of the established Task Force that should be more than delighted to hear from us. If we can get enough bloggers to contribute ideas it might prove itself a useful exercise--at least more so than the futile argument going on about 9/11 :127:
What do you think, JO ?


Realagen, you can start ANY topic thread you want, name it "municpal campaign financial/electoral reform" or something like that. just start the thread off provactively....to entice responses :spinball:
User avatar
fluffy
Admiral HMS Castanet
Posts: 28005
Joined: Jun 1st, 2006, 5:42 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by fluffy »

Logitack wrote: just start the thread off provactively....to entice responses :spinball:


"Summerland Council Reluctant to Bare Privates."
“We’ll go down in history as the first society that wouldn't save itself because it wasn't cost effective.” – Kurt Vonnegut
Jo
Slot 16
Posts: 22663
Joined: Nov 27th, 2004, 12:33 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by Jo »

realagen wrote:If we can get enough bloggers to contribute ideas it might prove itself a useful exercise--at least more so than the futile argument going on about 9/11 :127:
What do you think, JO ?


Please feel free to fire up another thread taking a tangent of this one, sounds good.
realagen
Fledgling
Posts: 110
Joined: Nov 4th, 2008, 9:44 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by realagen »

Please join the new thread under the title of --
CHANGES NEEDED TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT
Logitack
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 14212
Joined: Aug 12th, 2009, 7:13 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by Logitack »

which forum did you put the new thread?

eta: in the BC forum.... :127:
realagen
Fledgling
Posts: 110
Joined: Nov 4th, 2008, 9:44 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by realagen »

follow this link:
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=23530&p=632112&hilit=CHANGES+NEEDED+TO+THE+LOCAL+GOVERNMENT+ACT#p632112
Actually, I'm not quite sure what area it falls under.
Logitack
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 14212
Joined: Aug 12th, 2009, 7:13 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by Logitack »

i would have left the new thread here in the Penticton forum, since this is where the interest and discussion was occurring.

although what else can one say other than there should be changes made.
Pure Canadian
Fledgling
Posts: 199
Joined: Nov 27th, 2009, 9:33 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by Pure Canadian »

The thread is in the BC Forum. I just added the news release from the BC Government. I wonder why the Task Force does not have any independent members - opposition politicians, retired judge, citizens, etc.?
realagen
Fledgling
Posts: 110
Joined: Nov 4th, 2008, 9:44 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by realagen »

If anyone is still following this post here is a very recent column by Daphne Branham of the Vancouver Sun--

By Daphne Bramham, Vancouver SunApril 30, 2010 Civic election campaigns are awash in money even in small communities
and municipalities where candidates have no real challengers. As interesting as that is, what's as intriguing is the money that is never accounted for; money spent by individuals and groups who endorsed and promoted various candidates across the province and broke the law by failing to register or file the necessary financial disclosures.

They've been allowed to get away with it because the Local Government Act is deeply flawed, even with the amendments made less than seven months before the 2008 election requiring third-party registration and disclosure.

Chief among the act's flaws is that it has penalties, but no enforcement provisions.

Chief electoral officers have no investigative powers and, even if they did, they would likely be perceived to be in a conflict of interest because, almost invariably, they are municipal employees.

Citizens can file private prosecutions, but that puts the onus of investigation and court costs on their shoulders.

Police can investigate after citizen complaints. But there are -- to put it mildly -- investigative challenges.

Police did conduct investigations in West Vancouver, Central Saanich, Langley, Summerland and Gibsons following the 2008 election.

In West Vancouver, a group called Low Tax, Low Growth Association sent out glossy brochures endorsing a slate of candidates. It neither registered as a campaign organizer nor filed a financial disclosure even though it spent thousands of dollars.

Although West Van police recommended charges, Crown counsel said there was no reasonable likelihood of conviction and it was not in the public interest to proceed.

In Central Saanich, several groups that endorsed candidates failed to register; among them was the Peninsula Co-op, which had the local chief of police on its board. RCMP were called in and spent more than 600 hours investigating. They recommended charges against 19 individuals, but again Crown counsel said there was no reasonable likelihood of conviction and it was not in the public interest to proceed.

In Langley, the names of two provincial cabinet ministers appeared in newspaper ads endorsing a slate. No charges were recommended; RCMP didn't know what value to place on the endorsement.

Nor did the RCMP make any recommendation to charge an individual, on the grounds the person didn't know about the act and complied after being told. So much for the ignorance-is-no-defence theory.

In Summerland, Citizens for Smart Governance ran five ads endorsing all of the successful candidates, including the mayor. Only after intense media interest did local businessman Mark Ziebarth come forward and claim that he was the only person in the group. He also insisted to CBC Radio that during next election not only will he again refuse to register, he'll spend more money.

No charges were recommended there or in Gibsons, where the citizens complained of conflicts of interest. It's not because there may not have been cause for charges in both communities, but because the time limit to charge anyone had expired.

The Local Government Act sets no time frame within which charges can be laid. As a result, police have no choice but to use the Offence Act, which says no action can be taken more than six months after an offence has taken place.

This is ridiculous in the case of municipal election complaints.

Candidates, campaign organizers and election organizations don't even have to file their financial disclosures until 120 days after the election. That leaves a scant two months for citizens or police to investigate.

And while the complaints from the last election focused on failures to register and disclose, there are far more serious offences in the act including vote-buying and intimidation that may be more complicated to investigate.

As a result of myriad concerns about the act and spurred by the media attention given to the shadowy groups and the subsequent investigations, Premier Gordon Campbell finally appointed a Local Government Elections Task Force to review the civic election rules last December.

The panel has received hundreds of submissions from groups and individuals, although names are redacted on the individual submissions because of privacy concerns.

In its submission, the RCMP lays out the multitude of problems with the act. Among the investigative challenges, it says there is not enough time

to investigate, investigations require specialized skills and local police (including RCMP working as municipal police) have either real or perceived conflicts of interest.

As a result of its experience with "at least five complaints" following the 2008 vote, RCMP recommend five changes:

. Empower Elections BC, or establish another body, to receive and review all complaints to ensure only the most serious are referred to police.

. Add a limitation-of-action section to the Local Government Act of at least one year from the date of the alleged offence to bringing the complaint to the attention of the appropriate authority.

. Expand the number of offences for which automatic penalties apply.

. Address the actual or perceived conflict of interest arising from local police investigating their political overseers.

. Ensure that officers have the necessary skills to investigate election-related complaints, which may require training a pool of officers -- both RCMP and local police -- familiar with the act who could act as primary investigators.

All of those recommendations make sense and would help restore some confidence in the electoral system. But they are only part of the reform that's needed.

[email protected]


Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Gettin ... z0mbdY4aJH
Pure Canadian
Fledgling
Posts: 199
Joined: Nov 27th, 2009, 9:33 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by Pure Canadian »

Good story. I wonder what the new special prosecutor will say about election financing and our top cop?
realagen
Fledgling
Posts: 110
Joined: Nov 4th, 2008, 9:44 pm

Re: Summerland municipal campaign financial irregularities

Post by realagen »

I just logged into this by error and it probably won't be read by anyone so long after the fact.
Looks like Martens had the last laugh after all although it took a few years.
All of the people that he supported in the last election were elected and the few that he did not support -- Perrino (Didn't run because she knew she was going to lose anyway), Halquist, Christopherson, --were outed.
Incidentally, the RCMP interrogation went badly. The case against the Councillors in question was negated because the charges came too late. Oh, yeah.
Post Reply

Return to “South Okanagan”