Drowning in Penticton Channel
-
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 4369
- Joined: Feb 27th, 2014, 3:22 pm
Drowning in Penticton Channel
https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-s ... htm#200623
Horrible. Only 20yo. My condolences to friends and family.
Sounds like this was another case of "tube tied to arm/leg" which led to the drowning. There was a similar story 2 or 3 years ago with a young women drowning while tubing the river in Enderby. Please pass the word - better to have your tube/floatie get away from you than to have it drown you.
Horrible. Only 20yo. My condolences to friends and family.
Sounds like this was another case of "tube tied to arm/leg" which led to the drowning. There was a similar story 2 or 3 years ago with a young women drowning while tubing the river in Enderby. Please pass the word - better to have your tube/floatie get away from you than to have it drown you.
- GordonH
- Сварливий старий мерзотник
- Posts: 39043
- Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
Sad story, my condolences to the Family and Friends.
Was suppose to be a fun day floating down the channel, that can change in a split second.
Please don't tie yourself to the floatie.
If you have issues with your ability to swim then check out some of latest personal floatation devices/life jackets.
Was suppose to be a fun day floating down the channel, that can change in a split second.
Please don't tie yourself to the floatie.
If you have issues with your ability to swim then check out some of latest personal floatation devices/life jackets.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
-
- Fledgling
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Jul 8th, 2014, 11:06 am
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
That channel is freaking scary. I'm a big guy, 6'7 ish, I went down the channel last year and I could JUST BARLEY touch the bottom in the area I tried. I'm not the greatest swimmer but I thought if I could touch bottom id be fine, NOPE, the current was so powerful it was dragging me like I didn't exist.
I shudder to think how fast it could drown you if you tie yourself to something it has a hold of. I remember we went under the bridge(I know dumb) and I was looking down at that churning water thinking yep, if I fall in its all over, no way I'm surviving this.
Freaky stuff, horrible for this poor guy.
I shudder to think how fast it could drown you if you tie yourself to something it has a hold of. I remember we went under the bridge(I know dumb) and I was looking down at that churning water thinking yep, if I fall in its all over, no way I'm surviving this.
Freaky stuff, horrible for this poor guy.
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
-
- Übergod
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: Aug 11th, 2005, 6:43 am
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
If you're going down the channel and can't swim at all, then you should be wearing a PFD. Having it sitting beside you won't save you. Right now the undertow on the channel is exceptionally strong, and it'd deep everywhere.
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Nov 26th, 2013, 11:15 am
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
Okay, I've lived here for many years, and I can't believe I'm going to admit this!
I have never done the channel float.
I was thinking this might be the year now that our children are a little older. But I have 2 very small stature girls (real shorties).
Is it dangerous with or without a life jacket? Both are decent enough swimmers, but I would make them wear a PFD. But can they get swept away from you easy? Because I am not looking for trauma or drama. Is this year somehow more dangerous than other years?
I have never done the channel float.
I was thinking this might be the year now that our children are a little older. But I have 2 very small stature girls (real shorties).
Is it dangerous with or without a life jacket? Both are decent enough swimmers, but I would make them wear a PFD. But can they get swept away from you easy? Because I am not looking for trauma or drama. Is this year somehow more dangerous than other years?
- GordonH
- Сварливий старий мерзотник
- Posts: 39043
- Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
Osoyoos_Familyof4 wrote:Okay, I've lived here for many years, and I can't believe I'm going to admit this!
I have never done the channel float.
I was thinking this might be the year now that our children are a little older. But I have 2 very small stature girls (real shorties).
Is it dangerous with or without a life jacket? Both are decent enough swimmers, but I would make them wear a PFD. But can they get swept away from you easy? Because I am not looking for trauma or drama. Is this year somehow more dangerous than other years?
I suspect due to Okanagan Lake levels, the dam control is close to max so current in channel would be strong. That would mean any under tow would be just that much stronger as well.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
- JagXKR
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3478
- Joined: Jun 19th, 2011, 6:25 am
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
Osoyoos_Familyof4 wrote:Okay, I've lived here for many years, and I can't believe I'm going to admit this!
I have never done the channel float.
I was thinking this might be the year now that our children are a little older. But I have 2 very small stature girls (real shorties).
Is it dangerous with or without a life jacket? Both are decent enough swimmers, but I would make them wear a PFD. But can they get swept away from you easy? Because I am not looking for trauma or drama. Is this year somehow more dangerous than other years?
An Olympic sized pool has 2500 cubic meters of water. The average flow from the dam is about 78 cubic meters per second right now. So every 1 minute just under 2 swimming pools of water flow past any given spot.
I would not go on it with young children right now but I am a poor swimmer and would not be able to render assistance if needed. It was moving really fast when I looked at it a few days back.
https://wateroffice.ec.gc.ca/report/rea ... tn=08NM050
Why use a big word when a diminutive one will suffice.
-
- Übergod
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Dec 16th, 2010, 2:48 pm
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
I won't be going in the channel this summer. Neither will my kids. Not only is it too full and strong but the water looks gross too.
There has been years when you can walk down almost the whole way, other years it's deep. This year is the highest and fastest I have ever seen it and until the lake is back at regular pool levels it won't be changing.
Just yesterday I saw kids jumping off the last bridge into the most dangerous spot. I've seen countless floaties tied together, every day.
People just don't care. They think it just won't happen to them. Sadly, it does. You can't fix stupid.
There has been years when you can walk down almost the whole way, other years it's deep. This year is the highest and fastest I have ever seen it and until the lake is back at regular pool levels it won't be changing.
Just yesterday I saw kids jumping off the last bridge into the most dangerous spot. I've seen countless floaties tied together, every day.
People just don't care. They think it just won't happen to them. Sadly, it does. You can't fix stupid.
-
- Fledgling
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Jul 8th, 2014, 11:06 am
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
ToddT wrote:I won't be going in the channel this summer. Neither will my kids. Not only is it too full and strong but the water looks gross too.
There has been years when you can walk down almost the whole way, other years it's deep. This year is the highest and fastest I have ever seen it and until the lake is back at regular pool levels it won't be changing.
Just yesterday I saw kids jumping off the last bridge into the most dangerous spot. I've seen countless floaties tied together, every day.
People just don't care. They think it just won't happen to them. Sadly, it does. You can't fix stupid.
Yup, I get stressed out just looking at the channel, it just screams death this year.
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 3
- Joined: May 14th, 2015, 1:46 pm
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
Yet again another pair of people got themselves tangled on the channel today. Maybe a fine or rescue charge if the rafts are tied together is needed. If there was a monetary cost, besides losing their floaties, people might think twice about it.
https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-s ... htm#202599
https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-s ... htm#202599
-
- Guru
- Posts: 6518
- Joined: May 29th, 2013, 2:08 pm
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
Wear a PFD and if you go in, get orientated so you are on your back and go down feet first...
I am not wealthy but I am rich
-
- Fledgling
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Jul 8th, 2014, 11:06 am
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
seewood wrote:Wear a PFD and if you go in, get orientated so you are on your back and go down feet first...
Would a PFD be enough to save you from the drowning machine effect? I'm sure as heck not going to test it myself just wondering.
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
-
- Übergod
- Posts: 1811
- Joined: Feb 21st, 2011, 4:38 pm
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
seewood wrote:Wear a PFD and if you go in, get orientated so you are on your back and go down feet first...
Kind of odd...the laws. Says you have to at least HAVE a PFD in your boat (even a dingy/rubber raft) while on the lakes but with that same boat, you do not, while on the fast flowing river channel? Of course the main problem here appears to be the boneheads who tied them together on the channel.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 6518
- Joined: May 29th, 2013, 2:08 pm
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
GordonH wrote:I suspect due to Okanagan Lake levels, the dam control is close to max so current in channel would be strong. That would mean any under tow would be just that much stronger as well.
I suspect you suspect correctly.... The lake level is still high for this time of year so me thinks the dam is still open more than usual and flows are still pretty high.
The water speed is fastest below the surface. The bottom acts as a friction surface so water speed is slow there and as one moves up the water column the water speed increases until the surface where the air acts as a friction source and slows a bit.
Surface may be clipping along, but it is moving faster below the surface...careful eh.
I am not wealthy but I am rich
-
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 4369
- Joined: Feb 27th, 2014, 3:22 pm
Re: Drowning in Penticton Channel
Their boats got hung up - no big deal. The only reason they needed to be rescued is because they didn't want to leave their boats behind and/or get wet. The "rescue" consisted of the FD showing up with a pair of scissors to cut the rope.
The danger is when you tie the boat to yourself.
The danger is when you tie the boat to yourself.