47304
45647

Fire danger

Fire danger

Postby Frisk » May 29th, 2017, 4:03 pm

Probably time for some rain, especially up north.
Attachments
May 29th.png
May 29th 2.png
May 29th 2.png (64.88 KiB) Viewed 2684 times

2 people like this post.
User avatar
Frisk
Guru
 
Posts: 7366
Likes: 2563 posts
Liked in: 1795 posts
Joined: Apr 24th, 2011, 8:32 am
Location: West Kelowna

Re: Fire danger

Postby Glacier » Jun 16th, 2017, 8:11 pm

Extreme fire danger out there. Alexis Creek, Nemiah, Puntzi Mountain, Tatla Lake. All extreme. Plus one spot in our fire zone (Ashcroft).

drJune162017.png
drJune162017.png (60.72 KiB) Viewed 2175 times
User avatar
Glacier
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 25597
Likes: 2306 posts
Liked in: 7715 posts
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 9:41 pm

Re: Fire danger

Postby What_the » Jun 17th, 2017, 12:13 am

Graphs. Right up glaciers alley...
And the first to post lol

Sorry, carry on.
Would so rather be over educated that a knuckle dragging Neanderthal bereft of critical thought and imagination. Although in the case of Neanderthals, that's quite the insult.
User avatar
What_the
Übergod
 
Posts: 1413
Likes: 312 posts
Liked in: 621 posts
Joined: Feb 18th, 2017, 1:24 pm

Re: Fire danger

Postby Symbonite » Jun 23rd, 2017, 12:23 pm

well its that time of the year again....before its too late...ban campfires!
**Disclaimer: The above statement is in my OPINION only.
User avatar
Symbonite
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3172
Likes: 15 posts
Liked in: 611 posts
Joined: Feb 16th, 2005, 9:30 am
Location: From Within

Re: Fire danger

Postby Glacier » Jun 23rd, 2017, 12:55 pm

What_the wrote:Graphs. Right up glaciers alley...
And the first to post lol

Sorry, carry on.

I was last as well until you showed up. Thanks for ruining everything!

dr-June23-2017.png
dr-June23-2017.png (63.98 KiB) Viewed 1984 times
User avatar
Glacier
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 25597
Likes: 2306 posts
Liked in: 7715 posts
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 9:41 pm

Re: Fire danger

Postby Glacier » Jun 26th, 2017, 1:12 pm

It's highly likely that the lightning will make its way down our way this week. We will likely get some rain too, but not a lot.

firedangerrating.jpg
User avatar
Glacier
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 25597
Likes: 2306 posts
Liked in: 7715 posts
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 9:41 pm

Re: Fire danger

Postby Frisk » Jun 26th, 2017, 4:11 pm

Check out some of the weather conditions in BC right now & then compare those locations with the fire danger map glacier posted above.

Kamloops
Temperature: 32.0°C
Humidity: 12%
Wind: SW 38 gust 61 km/h

Clinton
Temperature: 26.0°C
Humidity: 7%
Wind: WNW 30 gust 48 km/h

Lytton
Temperature: 31.3°C
Humidity: 14%
Wind: S 37 gust 55 km/h
User avatar
Frisk
Guru
 
Posts: 7366
Likes: 2563 posts
Liked in: 1795 posts
Joined: Apr 24th, 2011, 8:32 am
Location: West Kelowna

Re: Fire danger

Postby seewood » Jun 26th, 2017, 4:21 pm

Those humidity readings are low, really low. Fire behavior at those low RH values can create explosive fire behavior, especially with some wind.
I am not wealthy but I am rich

canuck500 likes this post.
seewood
Board Meister
 
Posts: 413
Likes: 399 posts
Liked in: 382 posts
Joined: May 29th, 2013, 1:08 pm

Re: Fire danger

Postby bob vernon » Jun 27th, 2017, 7:10 am

Say...... just what is "tinder"? And why is it so dry?
bob vernon
Übergod
 
Posts: 1814
Likes: 7 posts
Liked in: 901 posts
Joined: Oct 27th, 2008, 9:37 am

Re: Fire danger

Postby Fancy » Jun 27th, 2017, 7:27 am

Google is your friend:
Tinder is easily combustible material used to start a fire.
Wikipedia
User avatar
Fancy
The Pilgrim
 
Posts: 43090
Likes: 940 posts
Liked in: 4845 posts
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 5:23 pm

Re: Fire danger

Postby Frisk » Jun 27th, 2017, 11:21 am

The fire danger rating way up in the hills at the Brenda mines weather station (extreme rating) yesterday was actually higher than the ratings in the valley bottom at the West kelowna, fintry and penticton stations (high rating).

http://bcfireinfo.for.gov.bc.ca/hprScripts/DgrCls/index.asp?Region=5

ferri likes this post.
User avatar
Frisk
Guru
 
Posts: 7366
Likes: 2563 posts
Liked in: 1795 posts
Joined: Apr 24th, 2011, 8:32 am
Location: West Kelowna

Re: Fire danger

Postby Symbonite » Jun 29th, 2017, 10:50 am

Who cares about campers belly aching about campfires...ban it before someone starts a forest fire....totally preventable fire if there is not fire to begin with.
**Disclaimer: The above statement is in my OPINION only.
User avatar
Symbonite
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3172
Likes: 15 posts
Liked in: 611 posts
Joined: Feb 16th, 2005, 9:30 am
Location: From Within

Re: Fire danger

Postby gman313 » Jun 29th, 2017, 10:55 am

Symbonite wrote:Who cares about campers belly aching about campfires...ban it before someone starts a forest fire....totally preventable fire if there is not fire to begin with.


banning smoking would actually save more forest fires. More start from cigarettes than campfires
gman313
Grand Pooh-bah
 
Posts: 2230
Likes: 824 posts
Liked in: 899 posts
Joined: Sep 15th, 2008, 7:03 pm

Re: Fire danger

Postby Glacier » Jun 29th, 2017, 12:10 pm

Frisk wrote:Check out some of the weather conditions in BC right now & then compare those locations with the fire danger map glacier posted above.

Kamloops
Temperature: 32.0°C
Humidity: 12%
Wind: SW 38 gust 61 km/h

Clinton
Temperature: 26.0°C
Humidity: 7%
Wind: WNW 30 gust 48 km/h

Lytton
Temperature: 31.3°C
Humidity: 14%
Wind: S 37 gust 55 km/h


This is very interesting. 7% in Clinton!!! The Clinton weather station is up on the Cariboo plateau. We are talking over just under 4,000ft elevation, and relative humidity tends to increase with elevation.

I tried to check out Ashcroft, and I get an error. It seems that it was so dry the instruments crapped out! We can see at 8pm when the dewpoint temperature was -6C. If the dewpoint were like that an hour earlier, the relative humidity would have been damn close to zero.

From Wikipedia:

This can be expressed as a simple rule of thumb:

For every 1°C difference in the dew point and dry bulb temperatures, the relative humidity decreases by 5%, starting with RH = 100% when the dew point equals the dry bulb temperature.

The air was so dry, it's off the charts, as in the rule of thumb doesn't work. I would guess it was well under 5%.

Anyway, back to Clinton. Clinton is at close to 4,000 feet and Ashcroft is at about 1,000 ft, so the air is much drier in Ashcroft (relative humidity). We can compare the two in the links in this post from the 26th. Now, the Clinton airport is a relatively new station, but the old station (also on the plateau, but lower), crapped out just like Ashcroft.

So, it seems these weather stations cannot record relative humidities under 10%, but the new Clinton airport station can.

Now, let's look at the data from the airport. Between 1pm and 7pm, the dew point temperature tanked (the lower the dewpoint, the less moisture in the air). RELATIVE humidity is basically a measure of the difference between the actual temperature and the dewpoint. The bigger the difference, the lower the relative humidity. That's why it can be 100% in the morning and 30% in the afternoon even though the amount of moisture in the air hasn't changed.

So, the reasonable assumption is that Ashcroft was almost zero. Maybe 4 or 5%. If we look at Clinton, it was 17% at noon, and 20% at 8pm. Between those times, it was down to 7%. Ashcroft was 11% at noon and 8pm, so it was quite reasonably 5% between those times. Crazy!

Frisk likes this post.
User avatar
Glacier
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 25597
Likes: 2306 posts
Liked in: 7715 posts
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 9:41 pm

Re: Fire danger

Postby Frisk » Jun 29th, 2017, 4:13 pm

User avatar
Frisk
Guru
 
Posts: 7366
Likes: 2563 posts
Liked in: 1795 posts
Joined: Apr 24th, 2011, 8:32 am
Location: West Kelowna

Next

Return to Fire Watch 2017

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests