41717
39499

Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby GordonH » Jul 17th, 2017, 11:28 am

tsayta wrote:Actually those owners are not allowed to touch that area due to the legal do not disturb covenant


Developers need to rethink some of the covenants, home buyers should be able to request fire prevention products for exterior of there homes. i.e instead of asphalt roofing.... metal options or clay (I know expensive), as well siding options

If nothing else it will slow the ability of wild fire from burning down the home, so firefighter have better chance of saving the houses.
Homeowners can also improve there chances by removing combustible item from around their homes, i.e. pine needles etc... etc

Added: Maybe don't need to go to the extreme i.e. the house on Lodge Rd in Winfield (those who live out there know the one I'm talking about)

tsayta likes this post.
User avatar
GordonH
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17050
Likes: 1560 posts
Liked in: 4793 posts
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm
Location: Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby Treblehook » Jul 17th, 2017, 11:41 am

Perhaps I missed it, but there is another factor contributing to the number of interface fires IMHO. Larger populations and the desire to live on the edge of the wilderness are certainly at play, but we have laws in place that control/prohibit campfires at certain times; laws that deal with open burning; and, laws that prohibit the discard of smoking materials from vehicles, but some people still insist on doing all of these things. Most would agree that many of the offenders who cause these fires through carelessness or negligence are of the same ilk as the people who dump their garbage in wilderness area, because it is convenient for them to do so. They are void of common sense, common courtesy and have no respect for others or their property, etc. The amount of money spent fighting these fires and the trauma suffered by people who lose their homes ought to dictate that no stone be left unturned in determining who is responsible for starting fires. At the same time criminal charges should be laid and heavy penalties assessed against those who are found guilty. Enough is enough!!! An example would be the fire that occurred off Westside road a month or so ago, where there was a tent and vacant campsite with a smoldering campfire next the place where the fire started. Perhaps the investigation couldn't establish that the unattended campfire [actually] started the forest fire, but we have heard nothing about the people associated with that campsite being prosecuted for leaving an unattended campfire???? They should be prosecuted and their identities made public for the deterrence value.

maryjane48 likes this post.
User avatar
Treblehook
Übergod
 
Posts: 1717
Likes: 1 post
Liked in: 958 posts
Joined: Jan 17th, 2011, 2:10 am

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby OldIslander » Jul 17th, 2017, 12:24 pm

UhHuhYeahSure wrote:3. Forests have not been allowed to burn in BC for the past +50 years. The government has made an empire out of fighting WILDfires, replacing the harvesting industry that has slowly dried up. There is more fuel in the bush than ever before. Good luck in trying to stop a fire once it takes hold. And if it's near a town and a house or trailer is lost, then it becomes an "interface fire".

Good post.

Your point about fire suppression is not just a BC problem – it is a North American problem. Every area of NA has a natural fire cycle – that is, how often an area traditionally and naturally burned, before we came along with our ground crews, bulldozers, and water bombers. If that natural cycle is exceeded due to fire suppression, then when a fire finally does occur, it will burn hotter in the accumulated fuels, tending to kill trees that should have survived, and burning deeper into the duff, doing more damage to the soils in which the forest must regenerate.

Florida is a good example. They purposely burn two million plus acres per year with prescribed fire. Then when they have wildfires, if they occur in pre-burned areas, they are manageable, with little or no loss of structures or life. In unburned areas, all bets are off.

In the US, they evaluate each fire. If it is remote, with no communities or other valuable resources in its path, they may elect to let it burn. In our remote Northwest Territories, they often simply monitor fires, and let them burn. Fires usually don’t turn monstrous there, because they’ll likely eventually run into an area that has burned in previous years.

But our forestry folks can’t do that now. There are people everywhere in BC, and almost any fire is going to burn someone’s property or timber license. After the 1995 Garnet Fire in Penticton, fire managers were accused of initially ‘letting the fire burn’, which proved to be untrue. No fire manager wants to risk criminal charges, for damages due to this decision.

With climate change and continued suppression, devastating fire activity will likely continue to grow worse in the upcoming decades.
"Bad officials are elected by good citizens who do not vote."

maryjane48 likes this post.
User avatar
OldIslander
Fledgling
 
Posts: 202
Likes: 233 posts
Liked in: 212 posts
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2014, 10:48 am
Location: Vancouver Island

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby hobbyguy » Jul 17th, 2017, 3:44 pm

This article, in a different context examines the whole issue: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/08/130827-wildfires-yosemite-fire-firefighters-vegetation-hotshots-california-drought/

Notably:

"As fuels increase and temperatures rise, the number of people moving to areas that border wildlands—a location called a WUI, short for wildland-urban interface—also continues to increase. The number of housing units within half a mile of a national forest, for instance, grew from 484,000 in 1940 to 1.8 million in 2000."
We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both. - Louis D. Brandeis
hobbyguy
Guru
 
Posts: 5663
Likes: 1418 posts
Liked in: 3773 posts
Joined: Jan 20th, 2011, 9:10 pm

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby Queen K » Jul 17th, 2017, 3:57 pm

Just driving on Chute Lake Road today I saw so much "ladder" material along the side of the road it wasn't funny.

A few sparks and ...
What we write here can be deceiving, diving into the psyche beneath the surface can lead to murky waters indeed. Warning: creeping my facebook "Liked" pages may cause you to want to travel the World. And visit farms. Oh dear.
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
 
Posts: 45816
Likes: 6847 posts
Liked in: 7676 posts
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 12:39 pm
Location: What? You mean here?

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby Because_They_Lie » Jul 18th, 2017, 1:27 pm

Prime Minister announces action on British Columbia wildfires

PROVIDENCE, RI, July 14, 2017 /CNW/ - The Government of Canada will do its utmost to help the people of British Columbia facing the immediate and long-term impacts of destructive wildfires.

That is why the Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today announced the creation of a new ad hoc Cabinet committee to coordinate federal efforts to help the many communities affected by the wildfires raging through British Columbia.

The Ad Hoc Cabinet Committee on Federal Recovery Efforts for 2017 BC Wildfires will meet as required to advise on the Government of Canada's role in mitigation, recovery, and rebuilding efforts in response to the wildfires. The Committee will complement the on-the-ground efforts coordinated by the Government Operations Centre.

The Government of Canada will stand with British Columbians every step of the way as they deal with the devastation caused by these wildfires, and start to rebuild their communities.

Quote

"Our thoughts are with all British Columbians dealing with the devastating impacts of these wildfires. Our new Cabinet committee will work hard to address both the immediate and long-term needs of all the families, communities and businesses affected. I would like to thank the first responders, members of the Canadian Armed Forces, and all those working around the clock to help those affected by the wildfires. You represent the best of Canada."
— The Rt. Hon. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada

Quick Fact
•The ad hoc Cabinet Committee will comprise:
◦The Hon. Carla Qualtrough, Minister of Sports and Persons with Disabilities (Chair)
◦The Hon. Karina Gould, Minister of Democratic Institutions (Vice-Chair)
◦The Hon. Carolyn Bennett, Minister of Indigenous and Northern Affairs
◦The Hon. Jean Yves Duclos, Minister of Families, Children and Social Development
◦The Hon. Ralph Goodale, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
◦The Hon. Kent Hehr, Minister Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence
◦The Hon. Harjit S. Sajjan, Minister of National Defence
◦The Hon. Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Associated Links
•Wildfires in British Columbia
•Canadian Red Cross

This document is also available at http://pm.gc.ca

SOURCE Prime Minister's Office

For further information: PMO Media Relations: 613-957-5555
RELATED LINKS
http://pm.gc.ca/

http://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/prime-minister-announces-action-on-british-columbia-wildfires-634515213.html

I have to wonder what this will look like down the road, many interesting people constituting this committee.
Because_They_Lie
 
Posts: 33
Likes: 10 posts
Liked in: 6 posts
Joined: Jun 27th, 2017, 3:42 pm

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby tsayta » Jul 18th, 2017, 1:38 pm

So another filmon report which won't be actioned. Fitting that it comes from providence Rhode Island
Did not
User avatar
tsayta
Grand Pooh-bah
 
Posts: 2419
Likes: 945 posts
Liked in: 1150 posts
Joined: Feb 1st, 2006, 9:25 pm
Location: Kelowna

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby OldBlindDog » Jul 18th, 2017, 2:33 pm

More park closures, near interface areas:

https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-s ... htm#202104

Should just stay out of the woods until a bunch of rain falls.
User avatar
OldBlindDog
 
Posts: 40
Likes: 14 posts
Liked in: 20 posts
Joined: Jul 9th, 2013, 12:15 pm

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby Because_They_Lie » Jul 18th, 2017, 3:10 pm

tsayta wrote:So another filmon report which won't be actioned. Fitting that it comes from providence Rhode Island


I think this committee may just be an effective means to continue to roll out United Nations agenda 21.

Before posting the article I searched for a local news outlet with the same coverage, oddly I could not find any.

tsayta likes this post.
Because_They_Lie
 
Posts: 33
Likes: 10 posts
Liked in: 6 posts
Joined: Jun 27th, 2017, 3:42 pm

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby GordonH » Jul 20th, 2017, 5:17 pm

Any homeowners out there with cedar shingle roof in or near potential interface fire area's (as was today in Penticton).
Replace that roofing with metal look alike shingles or something not flammable (also don't use asphalt either)

Cedar shingles is to a interface fire like newspaper is to a campfire. Poof house is gone
User avatar
GordonH
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17050
Likes: 1560 posts
Liked in: 4793 posts
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm
Location: Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby bob vernon » Jul 21st, 2017, 6:46 am

Many people want to live beside a creek or river and then complain when they get flooded out. And all of our insurance rates go up to pay for it.

Many people want to live in a forest with nice big trees close to their house. And then wonder what went wrong when the forest burns down and takes their house with it. These same folks will demand that the conservation officer shoot the bear or cougar that comes near their place in the forest. Insurance rates? Ditto.
bob vernon
Übergod
 
Posts: 1656
Likes: 7 posts
Liked in: 738 posts
Joined: Oct 27th, 2008, 10:37 am

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby youjustcomplain » Jul 21st, 2017, 11:43 am

bob vernon wrote:Many people want to live beside a creek or river and then complain when they get flooded out. And all of our insurance rates go up to pay for it.

Many people want to live in a forest with nice big trees close to their house. And then wonder what went wrong when the forest burns down and takes their house with it. These same folks will demand that the conservation officer shoot the bear or cougar that comes near their place in the forest. Insurance rates? Ditto.



Well, my understanding of how insurance works is very different from yours.
If you buy a house along the side of a river that floods, one of two things happens. You don't have overland water insurance so you are not covered which doesn't affect my insurance premiums. OR, you do have overland water insurance, and make a claim. Everyone with overland water insurance will see a rate increase to cover your costs. Of course, if it's not a busy flood year, then premiums may remain the same.

House insurance does include fire insurance so it's a bit of a different story. If you build your house in the woods and it burns down in a fire, yes, my premiums would be affected as I will have the same residential home insurance policy that you do.

I don't think people living in the woods would wonder what went wrong when their house goes up in a forest fire. Who would find it surprising? nobody. And most people, I know, who live near wild life do not want any harm to come by the animals. Many that I've spoken to will not call conservation when a bear or cougar come onto their property out of fear that the the CO might destroy the animal. There are reasons why people chose to live in the woods, seclusion from idiots is one, but being closer to nature (animals included), is why they're there.
youjustcomplain
Board Meister
 
Posts: 426
Likes: 65 posts
Liked in: 220 posts
Joined: Jun 14th, 2016, 12:56 pm

Re: Why So Many Interface Fires Lately?

Postby Drip_Torch » Yesterday, 8:44 pm

youjustcomplain wrote:House insurance does include fire insurance so it's a bit of a different story. If you build your house in the woods and it burns down in a fire, yes, my premiums would be affected as I will have the same residential home insurance policy that you do.


I understand it to be a little bit different than that. Perhaps you've heard of the fire underwriters survey? They grade your property on behalf of your insurance provider, based on your proximity to a fire hydrant and the response time of your fire department. That's how your insurance company arrives at the premium you pay.

Ever notice after a large loss WUI incident we don't hear a peep from the fire underwriters survey? Instead we hear from the institute for catastrophic loss.

My understanding is your insurance provider is insured through a reinsurer for wildfire losses and the institute for catastrophic loss represent those reinsurers. At the end of the day, I'm pretty sure the buck stops somewhere near here, but I do know that it's not your insurance company that's taking the loss during a bad fire season.
Drip Torch - an upright and steadfast keeper of the flame, but when tilted sideways the contents spill and then our destiny is in the wind...
User avatar
Drip_Torch
Generalissimo Postalot
 
Posts: 737
Likes: 158 posts
Liked in: 330 posts
Joined: Aug 16th, 2012, 10:56 am

Previous

Return to Fire Watch 2017

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest