Gay rights and the church

Non-denominational discussion. Everybody welcome.
Moderator for this forum is: ferri

Moderators: Jo, jennylives, Triple 6, ferri

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby cliffy1 » Feb 12th, 2012, 1:07 am

Did you know the first man to get saved by grace in the New Testament was a gay man? Read about the Ethiopian Eunuch in Acts 8.
Did you know Jesus never condemned gay people and never condemned gay partnerships? Jesus affirmed gay people in Matthew 19:11-12.
http://www.gaychristian101.com/

Giving voice to Conservative Gay Evangelicals

This should give the religious right the willies.
Trying to get spiritual nourishment from a two thousand year old book is like trying to suck milk from the breast of a woman who has been dead that long.
User avatar
cliffy1
Board Meister
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Mar 5th, 2011, 1:41 pm
Location: Nakusp

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby grammafreddy » Feb 12th, 2012, 1:11 am

cliffy1 wrote:Did you know the
first man to get
saved by grace in the New Testament was a gay man? Read about the Ethiopian Eunuch in Acts 8.

Did you know Jesus never condemned gay people and never condemned gay partnerships?
Jesus affirmed gay people in Matthew 19:11-12.
http://www.gaychristian101.com/

Giving voice to Conservative Gay Evangelicals


This should give the religious right the willies.


Nah, they all have their ways of explaining "what Jesus meant". Hell, these things are written by mere men many years after the fact. They have no more idea about what Jesus meant than you or I do.
______________________________________________________

A budget should be a savings plan, not a spending plan.
User avatar
grammafreddy
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 24981
Joined: Mar 17th, 2007, 10:52 am

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby averagejoe » Feb 12th, 2012, 1:46 am

cliffy1 wrote:Did you know the first man to get saved by grace in the New Testament was a gay man? Read about the Ethiopian Eunuch in Acts 8.
Did you know Jesus never condemned gay people and never condemned gay partnerships? Jesus affirmed gay people in Matthew 19:11-12.
http://www.gaychristian101.com/

Giving voice to Conservative Gay Evangelicals

This should give the religious right the willies.


Could you post what your reading? This what I found.

11But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.

12For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se ... ersion=KJV

Eunuchs

eu·nuch
   [yoo-nuhk] Show IPA
noun
a castrated man, especially one formerly employed by Oriental rulers as a harem guard or palace official.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/eunuch

How do you read into this that the Ethiopian was gay?
Some people like to call everything they can't handle a conspiracy.

Quote by DerKaiser
User avatar
averagejoe
Guru
 
Posts: 5744
Joined: Nov 23rd, 2007, 11:50 pm

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby grammafreddy » Feb 12th, 2012, 2:00 am

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunuch
The reference to "eunuchs" in Matthew 19:12 has been considered by some as referring to homosexual men, particularly in the case of those eunuchs "so born from their mother's womb".[50][51] Christians oppose this argument and state that the Bible's use of the word "eunuch" refers strictly to men incapable of sexual intercourse or reproduction, through either birth defect or castration[citation needed].
______________________________________________________

A budget should be a savings plan, not a spending plan.
User avatar
grammafreddy
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 24981
Joined: Mar 17th, 2007, 10:52 am

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby cliffy1 » Feb 12th, 2012, 8:40 am

averagejoe wrote:Could you post what your reading? This what I found.

11But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.

12For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se ... ersion=KJV

Eunuchs

eu·nuch
   [yoo-nuhk] Show IPA
noun
a castrated man, especially one formerly employed by Oriental rulers as a harem guard or palace official.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/eunuch

How do you read into this that the Ethiopian was gay?


Poke around on the site. There is much more stuff on there. I was more interested in the line: Conservative Gay Evangelicals.
Sounded like an oxymoron to me. Thought it would evoke the willies in fundies.
Trying to get spiritual nourishment from a two thousand year old book is like trying to suck milk from the breast of a woman who has been dead that long.
User avatar
cliffy1
Board Meister
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Mar 5th, 2011, 1:41 pm
Location: Nakusp

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby averagejoe » Feb 12th, 2012, 9:47 am

cliffy1 wrote:
averagejoe wrote:Could you post what your reading? This what I found.

11But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given.

12For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se ... ersion=KJV

Eunuchs

eu·nuch
   [yoo-nuhk] Show IPA
noun
a castrated man, especially one formerly employed by Oriental rulers as a harem guard or palace official.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/eunuch

How do you read into this that the Ethiopian was gay?


Poke around on the site. There is much more stuff on there. I was more interested in the line: Conservative Gay Evangelicals.
Sounded like an oxymoron to me. Thought it would evoke the willies in fundies.


I can see why they castrated men who guarded harems. But still, nothing says anything about being gay.
Some people like to call everything they can't handle a conspiracy.

Quote by DerKaiser
User avatar
averagejoe
Guru
 
Posts: 5744
Joined: Nov 23rd, 2007, 11:50 pm

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby averagejoe » Feb 12th, 2012, 9:52 am

grammafreddy wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunuch
The reference to "eunuchs" in Matthew 19:12 has been considered by some as referring to homosexual men, particularly in the case of those eunuchs "so born from their mother's womb".[50][51] Christians oppose this argument and state that the Bible's use of the word "eunuch" refers strictly to men incapable of sexual intercourse or reproduction, through either birth defect or castration[citation needed].


Thanks Gramma, but it says considered. The verse Matthew 19:12 doesn't hint that the eunuchs are gay? I looked last night at different types of the Holy Bible. Of course I was expecting the newer versions of the Holy Bible to change the meaning. But didn't see any.
Some people like to call everything they can't handle a conspiracy.

Quote by DerKaiser
User avatar
averagejoe
Guru
 
Posts: 5744
Joined: Nov 23rd, 2007, 11:50 pm

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby 5VP » Feb 12th, 2012, 2:57 pm

...and the pendulum(s) "swing(s)"...
Infinite rider on the big dogma...
5VP
Übergod
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Dec 26th, 2009, 10:48 am

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby hellomynameis » Feb 12th, 2012, 10:10 pm

Glacier wrote:I believe nickd is tying to say that you, Kompili, and Peaceseeker make good bedfellows...


:coffeecanuck:

Awesome post is awesome =D
"Books tap the wisdom of our species -- the greatest minds, the best teachers -- from all over the world and from all our history. And they're patient."
- Carl Sagan
Westbank Clear Sky Chart
Image
User avatar
hellomynameis
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3169
Joined: May 17th, 2007, 5:22 am
Location: Westbank

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby 5VP » Feb 13th, 2012, 9:16 am

I don't have a problem with gays now wanting to be called Eunuchs.

It's less biblical sounding than Sodomite.

Seems there are still many gray areas regarding the definition of homosexuals especially when it come to the use of the bible by both camps.
Infinite rider on the big dogma...
5VP
Übergod
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Dec 26th, 2009, 10:48 am

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby sooperphreek » Feb 13th, 2012, 3:57 pm

why are gays seeking rights in church in the first place? they have no place there anyways. just go to a rainbow festival and dress like a tool and thats your rights in all their glory.
sooperphreek
Grand Pooh-bah
 
Posts: 2551
Joined: Oct 12th, 2006, 10:39 am

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby coffeeFreak » Feb 13th, 2012, 5:59 pm

sooperphreek wrote:why are gays seeking rights in church in the first place? they have no place there anyways. just go to a rainbow festival and dress like a tool and thats your rights in all their glory.



Are you F'ing kidding? :nutzoid: Can you back up this homophobic statement with a biblical quote from the New Testament?

Really not quite sure how any "christian" can rationalize this kind of thinking...
User avatar
coffeeFreak
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 4494
Joined: Oct 22nd, 2009, 6:06 pm

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby Hmmm » Feb 13th, 2012, 6:12 pm

coffeeFreak wrote:Can you back up this homophobic statement with a biblical quote from the New Testament?

Really not quite sure how any "christian" can rationalize this kind of thinking...
The new testament is very clear on the matter of homosexuality and it states that those who practice it will not enter into Gods Kingdom. Period. However, making unkind remarks as some do, is not called for and in fact there's also ample scripture to say, those who engage in that type of hateful speech, will also not enter into Gods Kingdom. Those who follow Christs example will. That's according to the Bible. Period.
I thought you said your dog doesn't bite....That's not my dog.
User avatar
Hmmm
Board Meister
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Jan 6th, 2012, 7:27 pm

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby coffeeFreak » Feb 13th, 2012, 9:09 pm

Hmmm wrote:
coffeeFreak wrote:Can you back up this homophobic statement with a biblical quote from the New Testament?

Really not quite sure how any "christian" can rationalize this kind of thinking...
The new testament is very clear on the matter of homosexuality and it states that those who practice it will not enter into Gods Kingdom. Period. However, making unkind remarks as some do, is not called for and in fact there's also ample scripture to say, those who engage in that type of hateful speech, will also not enter into Gods Kingdom. Those who follow Christs example will. That's according to the Bible. Period.


Okay, I concede it is probably in the New testament, and likely it was stated by Paul? Anyway, my issue is with the anal focus christians seem to have with homosexuality...why does this issue receive more judgement than other so called "sins".

Here's a list the "righteous" might want to attend to first, but then they might have to kick several of their congregation members out and then who will be left to tithe:

1 Adultery, 2 fornication, 3 uncleanness, 4 lasciviousness, 5 Idolatry, 6 witchcraft, 7 hatred, 8 variance, 9 emulations, 10 wrath, 11 strife, 12 seditions, 13 heresies, 14 Envyings, 15 murders, 16 drunkenness, 17 revellings 19 unrighteousness, fornication, 20 wickedness, 21 covetousness, 22 maliciousness; full of envy, murder, 23 debate, 24 deceit, 25 malignity; 26 whisperers, 27 Backbiters, 28 haters of God, 29 despiteful, 30 proud, 31 boasters, 32 inventors of evil things, 33 disobedient to parents, 34 Without understanding, 35 covenantbreakers, 36 without natural affection, 37 implacable, 38 unmerciful: 39 lawless and disobedient, 40 for the ungodly and 41 for sinners, 42 for unholy and profane, 43 for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, For 44 whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, 45for menstealers, 46 for liars, 47 for perjured persons, 48 and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;49 fearful, and 50 unbelieving, and 51 the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and 52 sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone; 53 whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.56 Thou shalt not steal, 57 Thou shalt not bear false witness; Honour thy father and thy mother: and, 58 Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 59 filthiness, 60 nor foolish talking, 61 nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks. For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.And 62 do not be drunk with wine, which is dissipation; but be filled with the Spirit 63 proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, 64 an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, 65 foolishness:

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=65069
User avatar
coffeeFreak
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 4494
Joined: Oct 22nd, 2009, 6:06 pm

Re: Gay rights and the church

Postby grammafreddy » Feb 14th, 2012, 1:06 am

coffeeFreak wrote:

Here's a list the "righteous" might want to attend to first, but then they might have to kick several of their congregation members out and then who will be left to tithe:

1 Adultery, 2 fornication, 3 uncleanness, 4 lasciviousness, 5 Idolatry, 6 witchcraft, 7 hatred, 8 variance, 9 emulations, 10 wrath, 11 strife, 12 seditions, 13 heresies, 14 Envyings, 15 murders, 16 drunkenness, 17 revellings 19 unrighteousness, fornication, 20 wickedness, 21 covetousness, 22 maliciousness; full of envy, murder, 23 debate, 24 deceit, 25 malignity; 26 whisperers, 27 Backbiters, 28 haters of God, 29 despiteful, 30 proud, 31 boasters, 32 inventors of evil things, 33 disobedient to parents, 34 Without understanding, 35 covenantbreakers, 36 without natural affection, 37 implacable, 38 unmerciful: 39 lawless and disobedient, 40 for the ungodly and 41 for sinners, 42 for unholy and profane, 43 for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, For 44 whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, 45for menstealers, 46 for liars, 47 for perjured persons, 48 and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;49 fearful, and 50 unbelieving, and 51 the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and 52 sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone; 53 whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.56 Thou shalt not steal, 57 Thou shalt not bear false witness; Honour thy father and thy mother: and, 58 Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 59 filthiness, 60 nor foolish talking, 61 nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks. For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.And 62 do not be drunk with wine, which is dissipation; but be filled with the Spirit 63 proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, 64 an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, 65 foolishness:

http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=65069


Okay, I'd say that lets every so-called Christian out .. and all their clergy, too. The red bold nails the Pope (amongst others on that list of sins). Goodbye, Pope! Y'all are burn in the lake of fire and brimstone.
______________________________________________________

A budget should be a savings plan, not a spending plan.
User avatar
grammafreddy
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 24981
Joined: Mar 17th, 2007, 10:52 am

PreviousNext

Return to Religion & Spirituality

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest