Christopher Hitchens dead at 62
- cliffy1
- Übergod
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Mar 5th, 2011, 12:41 pm
Re: Christopher Hitchens dead at 62
Woodenhead wrote:Yeah, as in "Thank Christ I get a week off!"
Love your avatar. Are you a fan of Gingrich?
I would think that Christ must be having a hissy fit over what has become of his holiday.
Trying to get spiritual nourishment from a two thousand year old book is like trying to suck milk from the breast of a woman who has been dead that long.
- Woodenhead
- Guru
- Posts: 5190
- Joined: Jun 2nd, 2009, 2:47 pm
Re: Christopher Hitchens dead at 62
Not a fan of any American politician. I just love newts.
Your bias suits you.
-
- Fledgling
- Posts: 173
- Joined: May 12th, 2010, 1:29 pm
Re: Christopher Hitchens dead at 62
I just read the last article that Christopher worte for Vanity Fair. He was a true intellectual. I am going to miss his rather unique view of the world and his cogent comments. Mostly, I agreed with his viewpoints and respect him for his beliefs. A great man !
- averagejoe
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 17299
- Joined: Nov 23rd, 2007, 10:50 pm
Re: Christopher Hitchens dead at 62
Kinda figures.....
Hitchens became a Marxist and a Trotskyist in his teens, beliefs that further developed during his time at Oxford University. In the 1960s, Hitchens joined the left – specifically the International Socialists – drawn by his anger over the Vietnam War, nuclear weapons, racism and "oligarchy", including that of "the unaccountable corporation." He became a socialist "largely [as] the outcome of a study of history, taking sides ... in the battles over industrialism and war and empire."
But by 2001, Hitchens had disavowed socialism, declaring "capitalism is the only revolutionary system."[2] In the same year he told Rhys Southan of Reason magazine that he could no longer say "I am a socialist." Socialists, he claimed, had ceased to offer a positive alternative to the capitalist system. Capitalism had become the more revolutionary economic system, and he welcomed globalization as "innovative and internationalist." He suggested that he had returned to his early, pre-socialist libertarianism, having come to attach great value to the freedom of the individual from the state and moral authoritarians.[3] Although, by 2004, he described himself as "a recovering ex-Trotskyite,"[4] in a 2006 debate, he remarked, "I am no longer a socialist, but I still am a Marxist".[5]
Hitchens, as recently as 2009, again referred to himself as "a Marxist." Hitchens continued to affirm his respect for Marxist theory, including his 2009 article for The Atlantic entitled "The Revenge of Karl Marx". There he explains how Marx's economic analysis in Das Kapital has predicted many of the failures of the U. S. economy, including the late-2000s recession. In a June 2010 interview with The New York Times, he stated, "I still think like a Marxist in many ways. I think the materialist conception of history is valid. I consider myself a very conservative Marxist." He continued to regard both Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky as great men, and the Bolsheviks' October Revolution as a necessary event in the modernization of Russia.[6]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christophe ... ical_views
Marxist, but no socialist
Hitchens stopped describing himself as a socialist in 2002, but insists that he remains a Marxist and a believer in the materialist conception of history. This distinction may not be as implausible as it appears. As the political fallout from the financial crisis demonstrated, while Marxism retains immense analytical appeal, it is of little prescriptive value
http://www.newstatesman.com/books/2010/ ... chens-life
Hitchens became a Marxist and a Trotskyist in his teens, beliefs that further developed during his time at Oxford University. In the 1960s, Hitchens joined the left – specifically the International Socialists – drawn by his anger over the Vietnam War, nuclear weapons, racism and "oligarchy", including that of "the unaccountable corporation." He became a socialist "largely [as] the outcome of a study of history, taking sides ... in the battles over industrialism and war and empire."
But by 2001, Hitchens had disavowed socialism, declaring "capitalism is the only revolutionary system."[2] In the same year he told Rhys Southan of Reason magazine that he could no longer say "I am a socialist." Socialists, he claimed, had ceased to offer a positive alternative to the capitalist system. Capitalism had become the more revolutionary economic system, and he welcomed globalization as "innovative and internationalist." He suggested that he had returned to his early, pre-socialist libertarianism, having come to attach great value to the freedom of the individual from the state and moral authoritarians.[3] Although, by 2004, he described himself as "a recovering ex-Trotskyite,"[4] in a 2006 debate, he remarked, "I am no longer a socialist, but I still am a Marxist".[5]
Hitchens, as recently as 2009, again referred to himself as "a Marxist." Hitchens continued to affirm his respect for Marxist theory, including his 2009 article for The Atlantic entitled "The Revenge of Karl Marx". There he explains how Marx's economic analysis in Das Kapital has predicted many of the failures of the U. S. economy, including the late-2000s recession. In a June 2010 interview with The New York Times, he stated, "I still think like a Marxist in many ways. I think the materialist conception of history is valid. I consider myself a very conservative Marxist." He continued to regard both Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky as great men, and the Bolsheviks' October Revolution as a necessary event in the modernization of Russia.[6]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christophe ... ical_views
Marxist, but no socialist
Hitchens stopped describing himself as a socialist in 2002, but insists that he remains a Marxist and a believer in the materialist conception of history. This distinction may not be as implausible as it appears. As the political fallout from the financial crisis demonstrated, while Marxism retains immense analytical appeal, it is of little prescriptive value
http://www.newstatesman.com/books/2010/ ... chens-life
Ecclesiastes 10:2 A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left.
Thor Heyerdahl Says: “Our lack of knowledge about our own past is appalling.
Thor Heyerdahl Says: “Our lack of knowledge about our own past is appalling.