Thursday, February 26th4.1°C

Michael "hide the decline" Mann - new SLAPP lawsuit

Your thoughts on environment issues and economic issues.

Moderators: ferri, Triple 6, Jo

Re: Michael "hide the decline" Mann - new SLAPP lawsuit

Postby Glacier » Nov 5th, 2012, 4:09 pm

jennylives wrote:I am not smarter than 90% of scientists who understand we are causing this. I'm pretty sure they understand the facts more than I do.

You might surprise yourself.... but I digress.

There are many examples in the not too distant past where the vast majority of scientists were dead wrong though. Instead of believing by faith what we are told, it's better to understand the how and why behind the science. What is clear (to me) is that climate is extremely complex and not well understood even by the most renowned experts in the field. The less understood something is, the higher the probability that the assumptions are wrong.

If we have an extremely cold winter like last year, it's a one-off phenomenon, but if we have a devastating hurricane, it's a sign of things to come. Logically, this is a bit hard to swallow.

Ignore the money, ignore the prestige, and focus on what is actually said.
"Demoralize the enemy from within by surprise, terror, sabotage, assassination. This is the war of the future."
~ Adolf Hitler
User avatar
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17652
Likes: 524 posts
Liked in: 1951 posts
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 9:41 pm

Re: Michael "hide the decline" Mann - new SLAPP lawsuit

Postby The Green Barbarian » Nov 8th, 2012, 5:18 pm

EDITORIAL: Climate-change crybabies

Michael Mann can’t take the heat, assaults free speech

Liberals are hot under the collar, but this has more to do with the election than the planet warming up. The presidential candidates didn’t say a word about global warming during the debates, so advocates of that theory are looking for a bit of attention.

Late last month, Penn State climate professor Michael Mann turned to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia to sue several individuals who dared satirize his work. Mr. Mann became famous three years ago when leaked Climategate emails referenced Mr. Mann’s “trick” used to “hide the decline” in global temperatures, inspiring countless parodies and scathing commentary.

The global-warming proponent was particularly peeved at a National Review article by columnist Mark Steyn and a Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) blog post containing verbal jabs labeling his work as fraudulent. “It is one thing to attempt to engage in discussion about debatable topics,” wrote Mr. Mann in his complaint. “It is quite another to discredit consistently validated scientific research through the professional and personal defamation of a Nobel Prize recipient.”

The latter statement came as something of a surprise to the people who hand out that prestigious award. “Michael Mann has never been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,” a spokesman for the Norwegian Nobel Institute told the Washington Examiner. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change did receive a collective award in 2007, but Mr. Mann was never singled out for his contributions to the panel.

As truth is a defense to libel, Mr. Mann’s resume puffery doesn’t help his case. Still, the legal threat is being taken seriously. CEI expects to file a formal response to the lawsuit in mid-December and will likely point out that Mr. Mann is a public figure interested in selling a book subtitled “Dispatches From the Front Lines.” Sam Kazman, CEI’s general counsel, thinks Mr. Mann ought to have a thicker skin. “Folks who choose to go into battle ought to use something other than lawsuits as their weapons,” Mr. Kazman told The Washington Times. “It’s ironic that an advocate of alarmist global warming ends up trying to freeze debate on that topic.”

This isn’t the first time Mr. Mann has turned to the judiciary to silence critics. In 2010, Minnesotans for Global Warming produced a viral YouTube video entitled “Hide the Decline.” Over 600,000 people viewed the animated likeness of Mr. Mann singing lines such as, “Michael Mann thinks he’s so smart, totally inventing the hockey stick chart.” The popular video was pulled after the group received a cease-and-desist letter. “My first reaction was, ‘Wow, I guess I hit a nerve,’” Elmer Beauregard, the video’s creator, told The Washington Times. Mr. Beauregard and his colleagues lacked the resources to mount a proper legal battle, so he is glad National Review and CEI aren’t backing down.

It’s essential for the survival of free speech that the peddlers of half-baked doomsday tales not get away with chilling spirited dissent. Global-warming proponents propagate the myth that “the science is settled” to shut down all possible disagreement. Those who run to a judge and cry about YouTube videos or clever blog posts clearly are not confident in the truth of their position. Mr. Mann’s lawsuit ought to be thrown out.

The Washington Times

Read more: EDITORIAL: Climate-change crybabies - Washington Times ... z2BgSj3qwl
The only thing necessary for the triumph of the NDP is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke (if he were alive today and lived in Canada)
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 11698
Likes: 1945 posts
Liked in: 2764 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 8:13 am


Return to Environmental & Economic Concerns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest