Central Green urban lie

Re: Central Green urban lie

Postby LANDM » Jan 11th, 2018, 4:04 pm

dirtybiker wrote:
LANDM wrote:The property would then sit there, undeveloped,


You say that like it is a bad thing.


Nope. I say it as an option that the city clearly does not want.

I fully realize that opinions vary on this and everything else.
LANDM
Guru
 
Posts: 6735
Likes: 1896 posts
Liked in: 3649 posts
Joined: Sep 18th, 2009, 10:58 am

Re: Central Green urban lie

Postby Roadhog » Jan 12th, 2018, 1:02 pm

One element from this development that concerns me is the money that apparently is going to be poured into the park. This was from the original Castanet article:

"Council has also approved $1.35 million for construction of Phase Two of a park on the Central Green property fronting Rowcliffe Avenue."

First: How does it take $1.35 million to construct a park? You need grass, a few trees and shrubs and some benches to sit on.

Second: why is the taxpayer on the hook for this? Why isn't this provided by the developer as part of the overall project cost?

5 people like this post.
Roadhog
 
Posts: 7
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 12 posts
Joined: Jul 16th, 2006, 5:31 pm

Re: Central Green urban lie

Postby dirtybiker » Jan 13th, 2018, 9:25 am

I drove down Richter past this development yesterday, I did not stop for a
better look.
The building facing Richter with all of it's brick work is what I would consider
good use of materials to fit what I consider appropriate for the area.
I like it.

At a glance, everything else just looked like infill of boxes.
"Don't 'p' down my neck then tell me it's raining!"

Queen K likes this post.
dirtybiker
Guru
 
Posts: 7139
Likes: 7603 posts
Liked in: 3369 posts
Joined: Mar 8th, 2008, 6:00 pm
Location: Central OK

Re: Central Green urban lie

Postby Urban Cowboy » Jan 13th, 2018, 2:27 pm

Roadhog wrote:One element from this development that concerns me is the money that apparently is going to be poured into the park.


Remember you are talking about the City of Kelowna here, and if there's one thing that they are obsessed with it's parks.

It really seems the amount of funds they direct towards that obsession has gotten ridiculous.

Maybe that price tag includes another spiffy biffy. :biggrin:
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand. Most people listen with the intent to reply.” -Stephen R. Covey
User avatar
Urban Cowboy
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 4423
Likes: 4692 posts
Liked in: 6498 posts
Joined: Apr 27th, 2013, 2:47 pm

Re: Central Green urban lie

Postby Queen K » Jan 15th, 2018, 6:20 pm

https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-s ... htm#216358

No to a rental building.

Yes to an apt building with strata.

And the "park is still a missing piece in this puzzle" meaning it's still go room for a park? Where?
Here I thought there was nothing lower than a snakes belly in a rut in a ditch. I was wrong.
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
 
Posts: 54875
Likes: 13176 posts
Liked in: 13984 posts
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 11:39 am
Location: What? You mean here?

Re: Central Green urban lie

Postby MAPearce » Jan 15th, 2018, 6:35 pm

Queen K wrote:https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-story-216358-1-.htm#216358

No to a rental building.

Yes to an apt building with strata.

And the "park is still a missing piece in this puzzle" meaning it's still go room for a park? Where?


I hear you Q .. NOTHING to rent ..

Maybe , just maybe . the CoK mayor and council will nix the park in favour of a "below market" rental builing.... for a paltry 10 years. drops mic and walks away
I payed attention in High school....But not to what they were trying to teach me..
User avatar
MAPearce
Walks on Forum Water
 
Posts: 11404
Likes: 1825 posts
Liked in: 4405 posts
Joined: Nov 24th, 2009, 5:15 pm

Re: Central Green urban lie

Postby Queen K » Jan 15th, 2018, 6:40 pm

right, no "low income housing" for Stober to build. So the entire place is like this? NO low income components?
Here I thought there was nothing lower than a snakes belly in a rut in a ditch. I was wrong.
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
 
Posts: 54875
Likes: 13176 posts
Liked in: 13984 posts
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 11:39 am
Location: What? You mean here?

Re: Central Green urban lie

Postby MAPearce » Jan 15th, 2018, 6:45 pm

Queen K wrote:right, no "low income housing" for Stober to build. So the entire place is like this? NO low income components?


Maybe Stober has an "alter ego" like our "Mayor Sugar Plum " ???

This isn't just a "coincidence" IMO
I payed attention in High school....But not to what they were trying to teach me..
User avatar
MAPearce
Walks on Forum Water
 
Posts: 11404
Likes: 1825 posts
Liked in: 4405 posts
Joined: Nov 24th, 2009, 5:15 pm

Re: Central Green urban lie

Postby TMBOkanagan » Jan 15th, 2018, 8:54 pm

Queen K wrote:right, no "low income housing" for Stober to build. So the entire place is like this? NO low income components?


No - the Karis Society is built and open offering transitional housing to women. And the Ki-Lo-Na Friendship society is built and open for low income rentals.
TMBOkanagan
Fledgling
 
Posts: 162
Likes: 559 posts
Liked in: 100 posts
Joined: Aug 8th, 2016, 1:02 pm

Previous

Return to Central Okanagan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 16 guests