Monaco is no go.

36Drew
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2722
Joined: Mar 29th, 2009, 3:32 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by 36Drew »

GordonH wrote:Sorry to tell you that mill is not going anywhere anytime soon. Tolko has a excellent setup especially using the lake as storage, plus a contract with Fortis to supply with power not used by the mill. From the generation plant onsite.


Nor should it. The city of Kelowna has an incredibly poor industrial base. The last thing pundits should be doing is trying to punt the last vestiges of industry from the city.
I'd like to change your mind, but I don't have a fresh diaper.
User avatar
GordonH
Сварливий старий мерзотник
Posts: 39063
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by GordonH »

^^^ Exactly
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
Swoop
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2738
Joined: Nov 4th, 2008, 3:54 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by Swoop »

...agreed - this valley cannot survive on wine and golf...in fact, all current indicators show that golf is in a serious downturn...
LoneWolf_53
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 12496
Joined: Mar 19th, 2005, 12:06 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by LoneWolf_53 »

Eyeswideopen wrote:*removed*

North end or whatever you want to call it is downtown unless you are still living in the 70's. There is no sawmill in downtown Toronto just like there hasn't been one in Downtown Vancouver since before Expo 86.....Lol.


No need to get snarky just because you've been called on a blatant error.

Toronto has a Robin Hood mill down close to the lakeshore, not to mention a CN yard, and host of other business viewed as industrial, a few of which are far bigger than the sawmill here.

Saskatoon is another one that has a flour mill about two blocks from downtown.

I'm fairly certain that Vancouver has sea ports in its downtown area, something that also qualifies as industrial use.

You need to get out more.
"Death is life's way of saying you're fired!"
User avatar
oneh2obabe
feistres Goruchaf y Bwrdd
Posts: 95131
Joined: Nov 23rd, 2007, 8:19 am

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by oneh2obabe »

Is recess over yet? Any further condescending, rude, or snide remarks will be removed w/o explanation. Same goes for off-topic comments.
Dance as if no one's watching, sing as if no one's listening, and live everyday as if it were your last.

Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain.
Eyeswideopen
Board Meister
Posts: 353
Joined: Jul 20th, 2009, 2:32 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by Eyeswideopen »

LoneWolf_53 wrote:
No need to get snarky just because you've been called on a blatant error.

Toronto has a Robin Hood mill down close to the lakeshore, not to mention a CN yard, and host of other business viewed as industrial, a few of which are far bigger than the sawmill here.

Saskatoon is another one that has a flour mill about two blocks from downtown.

I'm fairly certain that Vancouver has sea ports in its downtown area, something that also qualifies as industrial use.

You need to get out more.


You aren't seriously going to try to compare Toronto to Kelowna are you? LOL!

Ok fine we can have all those things downtown too...oh and don't forget several MILLION more people, mulitple freeways going into downtown, commuter trains, subways. At least that is what I have heard they have in them fancy cities like Toronto from them fancy city folk type people.
Swoop
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2738
Joined: Nov 4th, 2008, 3:54 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by Swoop »

...I think there's a comprehension issue here...no one was comparing K-Town to Hog-Town...you stated:
North end or whatever you want to call it is downtown unless you are still living in the 70's. There is no sawmill in downtown Toronto just like there hasn't been one in Downtown Vancouver since before Expo 86.....Lol.

...the reply was merely pointing out that yet again, you were wrong...and yet again, rather than acknowledging your mistake - you go on the offensive and attempt to discredit factual information with your condescending remarks...maybe just man-up and admit you're wrong once in awhile - rather than this constant side-step crap...
User avatar
Hassel99
Lord of the Board
Posts: 3815
Joined: Aug 23rd, 2012, 9:31 am

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by Hassel99 »

Eyeswideopen wrote:
You aren't seriously going to try to compare Toronto to Kelowna are you? LOL!

Ok fine we can have all those things downtown too...oh and don't forget several MILLION more people, mulitple freeways going into downtown, commuter trains, subways. At least that is what I have heard they have in them fancy cities like Toronto from them fancy city folk type people.



/facepalm



Are you not entertained?.. I sure am.
heath15
Newbie
Posts: 9
Joined: May 19th, 2015, 9:15 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by heath15 »

EdCase wrote:http://www.castanet.net/news/Kelowna/140236/Monaco-not-dead-yet

...or maybe it is still alive; or not!

The quote form the City is correct; this is a small town and it is difficult to get financing on a project of this scope. Add in the economic uncertainty right now and the market for this kind of development looks increasingly shaky.


This story today with the quotes from the developer, pretty much in line with how they were described in the first story yesterday ... that was about saying they will do this and that, when reality is nothing gets done, just stringing it along and buying time. Now supposedly trying to get the financing together before someone else puts an offer in on the land through the court sale!

Other projects, nothing started on the resurrection of the Lucaya property either, though it announced at the end of January. Guess the Manhattan drive project is probably on indefinite hold. And the Westcorp project moving slowly. Maybe too many big projects trying to get going at the same time again.

The sawmill is certainly on prime real estate for more housing and waterfront towers but assume that will be awhile (years) yet, or whenever the logs they are harvesting get to be too far away to keep the Kelowna mill profitable.
36Drew
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2722
Joined: Mar 29th, 2009, 3:32 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by 36Drew »

Eyeswideopen wrote:You aren't seriously going to try to compare Toronto to Kelowna are you? LOL!


You're the one the made the comparison. Somebody else has already re-quoted so no point in rehashing your mistake - save to point out that yet again you are absolutely wrong.

Eyeswideopen wrote:Ok fine we can have all those things downtown too...oh and don't forget several MILLION more people, mulitple freeways going into downtown, commuter trains, subways. At least that is what I have heard they have in them fancy cities like Toronto from them fancy city folk type people.


...and then you pose a strawman diatribe because you simply cannot admit that you were wrong.

So - you want the sawmill (which was there first, btw) to go. You want to get rid of one of the last vestiges of real industry from Kelowna. To what end? As has already been pointed out to you, larger urban bases can have industrial, commercial, and residential in rather close quarters in what one would consider to be "downtown". That mix provides a strong tax base so that you, the lowly tax payer, can a lower residential tax rate. That industry also provides decent-paying jobs to its employees, some of whom would hopefully spend their after-tax discretionary income at whichever burger joint it is that you work at, thus directly contributing to your own employment.
I'd like to change your mind, but I don't have a fresh diaper.
Eyeswideopen
Board Meister
Posts: 353
Joined: Jul 20th, 2009, 2:32 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by Eyeswideopen »

Yes that waterfront property is very valuable. Just quadruple the sawmills taxes. That should be enough incentive to get them to move.

Also that cement plant needs to go. Makes a lot of noise during weekdays and every year there are more and more condos around there. Time for the city to grow up. More development downtown to get people living and working downtown and not having to drive and less building of houses further and further up the mountainside.
User avatar
GordonH
Сварливий старий мерзотник
Posts: 39063
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by GordonH »

^^^ Good idea get rid of all of blue collar jobs from north-end of Kelowna. So where should they move to north end industrial area to (Mill, cement plant, Sun-rype & machine shops etc.... etc).

Oh then move in all those new white collars jobs, that will need condo's to live in. Oh what a perfect world.
I wish you much success in making this happen Eyeswideopen.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
Eyeswideopen
Board Meister
Posts: 353
Joined: Jul 20th, 2009, 2:32 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by Eyeswideopen »

GordonH wrote:^^^ Good idea get rid of all of blue collar jobs from north-end of Kelowna. So where should they move to north end industrial area to (Mill, cement plant, Sun-rype & machine shops etc.... etc).

Oh then move in all those new white collars jobs, that will need condo's to live in. Oh what a perfect world.
I wish you much success in making this happen Eyeswideopen.


Has nothing to do with getting rid of jobs. If those jobs go away it won't be because the location changes by a few miles. You can continue to have that heavy industry where it is and let downtown continue to rot away like it is now or you can make the area more appealing to developers and people considering living down there. Simple choice.

By clinging to the past you end up with this suburban sprawl we have now which results in more traffic and more of those ugly developments building up the mountainside. Urban planners know that this 1960s idea of living in suburbs and commuting downtown is a total complete failure. On top of that Kelowna is in a valley so it doesn't have anywhere to grow except further and further up the mountainsides. Kelowna needs to grow up and start thinking like a big city instead of clinging to this idea that it's still a small town.
Last edited by Eyeswideopen on May 21st, 2015, 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
GordonH
Сварливий старий мерзотник
Posts: 39063
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by GordonH »

Lets see how is the high-raise buildings doing:
● One down by Waterscapes dead
● Monaco dead
● Hotel at old Willow location going at snails pace
● SOPA new owners not much happening
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
zerograv
Banned
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mar 5th, 2009, 8:49 pm

Re: Monaco is no go.

Post by zerograv »

GordonH wrote:Lets see how is the high-raise buildings doing:
● One down by Waterscapes dead New owners, takes time to redesign
● Monaco dead Not according to developer
● Hotel at old Willow location going at snails pace Not anticipated to be ramped up for at least a few more months
● SOPA new owners not much happening Greyback is finishing deficiencies while the towers are being redesigned, Showhome expected to be finished soon and first phase units are already for sale.
Before giving someone a piece of your mind, make sure that you have enough to spare.
Post Reply

Return to “Central Okanagan”