Lakeshore Property with illegal fences & walls on beach

[Mitch85]

*removed*

[GordonH]

Since I have no interest in snooping in or around someone else's property, I'd rather hike around OMP. It doesn't matter to me if the foreshore is considered crown land, still doesn't interest me.
I suspect there is a segment of the population that enjoy snooping around.

[Fancy]

They knew what they where getting into. I purchased a house downtown near a nightclub, and hear drunk people walking home. I knew what I was buying, and where, and accept it. Those fences are illegal, much as if I put a fence on my sidewalk so the public couldn't pass.

That's a pretty glib answer. Like saying shouldn't buy near an airport. What if the property owners were there first? What if the beach wasn't an attractant to the public when they bought?

[Mitch85]

Since I have no interest in snooping in or around someone else's property, I'd rather hike around OMP. It doesn't matter to me if the foreshore is considered crown land, still doesn't interest me.
I suspect there is a segment of the population that enjoy snooping around.

OMP borders on private property. Some of which I own. I don't ask you not to 'snoop' in my property.

[Mitch85]

They knew what they where getting into. I purchased a house downtown near a nightclub, and hear drunk people walking home. I knew what I was buying, and where, and accept it. Those fences are illegal, much as if I put a fence on my sidewalk so the public couldn't pass.

That's a pretty glib answer. Like saying shouldn't buy near an airport. What if the property owners were there first? What if the beach wasn't an attractant to the public when they bought?

Right. They bought before the beach was there. I will not respond to anymore of your comments.

[Steppenwolf4]

Off topic

[GordonH]

Since I have no interest in snooping in or around someone else's property, I'd rather hike around OMP. It doesn't matter to me if the foreshore is considered crown land, still doesn't interest me.
I suspect there is a segment of the population that enjoy snooping around.

OMP borders on private property. Some of which I own. I don't ask you not to 'snoop' in my property.

I do my hiking up in the middle area of OMP, so unless you own park land. You will not see me at any of your fences.

[Mitch85]

Since I have no interest in snooping in or around someone else's property, I'd rather hike around OMP. It doesn't matter to me if the foreshore is considered crown land, still doesn't interest me.
I suspect there is a segment of the population that enjoy snooping around.

OMP borders on private property. Some of which I own. I don't ask you not to 'snoop' in my property.

I do my hiking up in the middle area of OMP, so unless you own park land. You will not see me at any of your fences.

Yes, but if you drive the KVR to get there, you have a perfect view of my property. Again, it's your right to drive it, and I hope you have fun. It's beautiful up there. A lot of rabbits this year, right? I personally would like the same freedom to walk my (and everyone else's) beach, and enjoy that.

[Steppenwolf4]

Likewise those property owners that have title to their property beyond the high water mark have the right to protect their private property and stop others from trespassing on their right of ownership.
The onus of proof of boundaries becomes the problem of the trespassers and their ability to obtain property deeds and survey markers before crossing that land.

[Mitch85]

Likewise those property owners that have title to their property beyond the high water mark have the right to protect their private property and stop others from trespassing on their right of ownership.
The onus of proof of boundaries becomes the problem of the trespassers and their ability to obtain property deeds and survey markers before crossing that land.

*removed* Many other things. Read this.

http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/indus ... te-moorage

[WalterWhite]

The recent direction this thread has taken makes me conclude it's run its purpose for me personally. As I stated earlier, much of the social media gabfest on this issue very closely resembles much of the recent attitudes displayed here, which is summed up simply as many feel it's an opportunity to say *bleep* the rich people. The topic is no longer about relevant information and clarifying points of misunderstandings and misinformation. It's devolved into a bitchfest with the snarkiest retort declaring themselves the winner. I along with several others have done what was possible in providing links to information and resources to simply clarify some seriously warped perceptions regarding this issue, and it has clearly run its course. I'll take the time to peruse and post for my own entertainment past this point, but I'm finished providing info as it's clearly not being read by those most in need of it. Cheers.

[Steppenwolf4]

OFF TOPIC YET AGAIN

[Mitch85]

OFF TOPIC

[GordonH]

Yes, but if you drive the KVR to get there, you have a perfect view of my property. Again, it's your right to drive it, and I hope you have fun. It's beautiful up there. A lot of rabbits this year, right? I personally would like the same freedom to walk my (and everyone else's) beach, and enjoy that.

Sorry to disappoint I start my hike from this location here:
https://www.google.ca/maps/@49.7813525, ... 312!8i6656

[Fancy]

Right. They bought before the beach was there. I will not respond to anymore of your comments.

k- that's funny since I didn't say they bought before the beach was there. Might try actually reading something I post before stating you won't be responding.