Time to take the foreshore back

User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72202
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by Fancy »

And who gets to clean up the garbage and damage after all those thousands of visitors? The homeowners. There are beaches and walkways for visitors and private docks aren't playgrounds for diving off - yes you'll get all sorts of fools and idiots and homeowners become liable. I can understand why they've done what they've done. Others in the same predicament complain about partygoers and dangerous situations but never get the help from authorities which they should.
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72202
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by Fancy »

fall wrote:With so many tour and adventure companies springing up maybe someone could capitalize on this and create a foreshore obstacle adventure tour, where you go and scale and hop all the makeshift obstructions along the beach and then wave to the owners when they are surprised to see you.

And here's the disrespect that is so often shown when people just want to enjoy their own backyard. Everyone is entitled to enjoy their home and so many laws are put into place to ensure that happens but, unfortunately, quite often not upheld.
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
fall
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2458
Joined: Mar 12th, 2010, 10:26 am

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by fall »

Fancy wrote:And who gets to clean up the garbage and damage after all those thousands of visitors? The homeowners. There are beaches and walkways for visitors and private docks aren't playgrounds for diving off - yes you'll get all sorts of fools and idiots and homeowners become liable. I can understand why they've done what they've done. Others in the same predicament complain about partygoers and dangerous situations but never get the help from authorities which they should.


I am just amazed that there has not been a lawsuit from one of these illegal docks or obstructions ( that we know of) that sets a new tone for all of this.
The city can install garbage cans along the way, no different than any other houses bordering public land.
Kelowna is a very congested, overcrowded city that will need more walkways and space in the coming years as the population continues to get out of control.
If the party goers are that much of an issue and the cops don't deal with it, live with it or move.
fall
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2458
Joined: Mar 12th, 2010, 10:26 am

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by fall »

Fancy wrote:And here's the disrespect that is so often shown when people just want to enjoy their own backyard. Everyone is entitled to enjoy their home and so many laws are put into place to ensure that happens but, unfortunately, quite often not upheld.


When your backyard borders public land and water that's a choice you make when buying.
Assuming that it will remain private and as good as yours forever and there will never be change is foolish.
User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72202
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by Fancy »

fall wrote:When your backyard borders public land and water that's a choice you make when buying.
Assuming that it will remain private and as good as yours forever and there will never be change is foolish.
When backyards are used as toilets and garbage cans by those very people who use public lands, that seems to be when howeowners have to do what's necessary to stop the behaviour.
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72202
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by Fancy »

High water mark to define foreshore isn't going to be this year's episode. Those that are thumbing their noses at the homeowners that have lost so much might consider it will be a long time before any of the foreshore can be restored or revert back to its natural state.
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
User avatar
WalterWhite
Lord of the Board
Posts: 3838
Joined: Jan 31st, 2017, 3:56 pm

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by WalterWhite »

fall wrote:When your backyard borders public land and water that's a choice you make when buying.
Assuming that it will remain private and as good as yours forever and there will never be change is foolish.
Fancy wrote: When backyards are used as toilets and garbage cans by those very people who use public lands, that seems to be when howeowners have to do what's necessary to stop the behaviour.


This is it in a nutshell. Respect - is a two way street.
fall
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2458
Joined: Mar 12th, 2010, 10:26 am

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by fall »

Fancy wrote:When backyards are used as toilets and garbage cans by those very people who use public lands, that seems to be when howeowners have to do what's necessary to stop the behaviour.


*removed*

Why do I not think it legally works that way?
Last edited by ferri on Jun 6th, 2017, 11:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: baiting
User avatar
Fancy
Insanely Prolific
Posts: 72202
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 6:23 pm

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by Fancy »

*removed*
Last edited by ferri on Jun 6th, 2017, 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: response to bait
Truths can be backed up by facts - do you have any?
Fancy this, Fancy that and by the way, T*t for Tat
LTD
Lord of the Board
Posts: 4700
Joined: Mar 31st, 2010, 3:34 pm

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by LTD »

*removed*
Last edited by ferri on Jun 6th, 2017, 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Making it personal
fall
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2458
Joined: Mar 12th, 2010, 10:26 am

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by fall »

*removed*
As Kelowna continues to grow it is inevitable that people will be utilizing the foreshore.
Unfortunately lakefront homeowners are not above the law.
Last edited by ferri on Jun 6th, 2017, 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Making it personal
LTD
Lord of the Board
Posts: 4700
Joined: Mar 31st, 2010, 3:34 pm

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by LTD »

*removed*
Last edited by ferri on Jun 6th, 2017, 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: response to removed post
User avatar
WalterWhite
Lord of the Board
Posts: 3838
Joined: Jan 31st, 2017, 3:56 pm

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by WalterWhite »

Fancy wrote:And who gets to clean up the garbage and damage after all those thousands of visitors? The homeowners. There are beaches and walkways for visitors and private docks aren't playgrounds for diving off - yes you'll get all sorts of fools and idiots and homeowners become liable. I can understand why they've done what they've done. Others in the same predicament complain about partygoers and dangerous situations but never get the help from authorities which they should.


fall wrote:I am just amazed that there has not been a lawsuit from one of these illegal docks or obstructions ( that we know of) that sets a new tone for all of this.
The city can install garbage cans along the way, no different than any other houses bordering public land.
Kelowna is a very congested, overcrowded city that will need more walkways and space in the coming years as the population continues to get out of control.
If the party goers are that much of an issue and the cops don't deal with it, live with it or move.


It's not city property.
fall
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2458
Joined: Mar 12th, 2010, 10:26 am

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by fall »

*removed*
Kelowna is a big, small city.
Sadly you can't change where your property is or the size of it and may have no choice but to move if you are that affected by people bothering you.
Last edited by ferri on Jun 6th, 2017, 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: response to removed post
fall
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2458
Joined: Mar 12th, 2010, 10:26 am

Re: Time to take the foreshore back

Post by fall »

WalterWhite wrote:
It's not city property.


I am sure the city would maintain it, like every other beach access point here and anywhere else.
Post Reply

Return to “Central Okanagan”