Page 2 of 5

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 29th, 2017, 1:56 pm
by the truth
this is why i think pedofiles can not be treated ever, its just how there brain is hardwired ,safe bet since birth

no different than the rest of us , if your born knowing you like members of the opposite sex or even same sex it is what it is you were born that way, then if all of a sudden your told you are no longer aloud to have sex with the gender you are attracted to or you will go to jail ,no way in hell your going to stop and no way in hell any program they make you take will ever work ,
hope this makes sense

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 29th, 2017, 2:05 pm
by KelownaCrackinCrew
You know what they call people like this, GOOFS. He'll get his in jail. I think our Judges are on the same diet mayor Rob Ford was on.

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 29th, 2017, 2:31 pm
by the truth
KelownaCrackinCrew wrote:You know what they call people like this, GOOFS. He'll get his in jail. I think our Judges are on the same diet mayor Rob Ford was on.


no he will not get his in jail--sad but true, he will be in pc with his kind

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 29th, 2017, 2:34 pm
by my5cents
Fancy wrote:At least he received more than the minimum and has to leave the province.


I've read several of the news accounts of his sentence and don't see anything about him having to leave the province, did I miss that somewhere ??

He can apply for parole after serving 1/3 of his sentence, so after 8 months. He must be released (statutory release) after serving 2/3 of his sentence. So the most he will serve is 16 months.

I'm sure his gymnast's fathers would have been OK with a conditional discharge as long as they got to give him an hour or two of gymnastic lessons first.

Likely he won't get much in jail, he'll never see "gen pop", he'll be with the rest of the skinners. Likely hone the skills of his hobby. "What f stop is best when hiding a GoPro in a garbage can at a park with natural lighting"

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 29th, 2017, 2:47 pm
by Fancy
Part of his bail condition he has to live with his mother in Toronto

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 29th, 2017, 2:57 pm
by my5cents
Fancy wrote:Part of his bail condition he has to live with his mother in Toronto

That would be before he was sentenced, his pre-trial release provisions.

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 29th, 2017, 3:03 pm
by the truth
i have read articles in the past were sex offenders having been forced to take sex offender programs in jail said did nothing
for them if anything they said it made them worse when they came out , because while they were in sex offender group in jail listening to other sex offenders crimes all it did was get them excited and fantasize :200:

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 29th, 2017, 3:31 pm
by Hmmm
i cannot post what I'm thinking here. Needless to say it would involve a more fitting sentence.

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 29th, 2017, 3:32 pm
by gman313
Hmmm wrote:i cannot post what I'm thinking here. Needless to say it would involve a more fitting sentence.


hmmmm


sorry had to

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 29th, 2017, 7:05 pm
by voice of reason
some people are just broken and should be culled from the herd

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 30th, 2017, 2:19 am
by humphriey
I am absolutely enraged that this sick *bleep* will only serve 2 years. What a joke!!! He preyed on these young girls. Young girls who trusted and idolized him. One of whom tried to commit suicide once his betrayal was discovered. These girls will NEVER fully recover from this, their innocence and ability to trust people is forever changed.
He had over 2000 photos on his laptop. Sick twisted photos, some were of babies engaged in sex acts. Two years for this??? Our judicial system has re-victimized these girls and caused just as much or MORE pain than the original crime against them.
Once again we send the message to our young girls and young women that any form of sexual assault against them is not really that serious and they should just accept it and move on. No big deal, nothing to see here!!!

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 30th, 2017, 8:29 am
by the truth
imo. the lawyer that defended this scum is no better

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 30th, 2017, 8:33 am
by Fancy
the truth wrote:imo. the lawyer that defended this scum is no better

That doesn't even make sense. So never have lawyers defend anyone? Even the guilty have rights and there was the Crown's stance on it. What were their recommendations?

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 30th, 2017, 8:42 am
by Fancy
http://www.kelownadailycourier.ca/news/ ... 36b3c.html
Even though there was a publication ban, there were still articles about this so I'm surprised no one posted about this before.

Re: Child Porn - 2 years

Posted: Aug 30th, 2017, 8:44 am
by Catsumi
Every time I start watching a movie on dvd I have to chortle while this warning churns out:

It basically says

If you have the temerity to copy this film, you can be fined $50,000.00 USD and be jailed five (5) years

Ok, so now we have priorities in the correct order!
:cuss: