No more portable signs
- WalterWhite
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3838
- Joined: Jan 31st, 2017, 3:56 pm
Re: No more portable signs
Even Steven wrote:Whyme2 wrote:Its a good start and then maybe they can work on the big ugly signs (Pattison) on the west side blocking the beautiful views.
If you mean billboards, it's out of their hands since it's Native land.
Whyme2 wrote:I know it’s native land. So would it be ok to stack refrigerators 6 stories high and get away with it?
A drive down Elk Rd., Grouse Rd. or Whitetail Lane will answer your question.
- Bpeep
- Mindquad
- Posts: 29026
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2008, 10:05 am
Re: No more portable signs
Probably a bad sign.
Seeking the apartment that is creating leasing interest concerns knowledgeable seclusive morons excessively.
- Piecemaker
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 12587
- Joined: Jun 6th, 2007, 8:43 pm
Re: No more portable signs
Sign of the times, I guess.
Most of the signs don't bother me in the least. We're a city, one expects to see signs.
I am much more bothered by trash along city streets.
Most of the signs don't bother me in the least. We're a city, one expects to see signs.
I am much more bothered by trash along city streets.
It's possible to do all the right things and still get a bad result.
-
- Fledgling
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Aug 8th, 2016, 2:02 pm
Re: No more portable signs
I'm not sure how many of you have visited some of the great tourist spots around Canada - such as Whistler for example? They have very strict bylaws about signage in their village and it helps to keep it beautiful. Even the McDonald's had to change their corporate standard sign in order to meet the design guidelines for signs in Whistler.
I think it will do wonders to make our City look less cluttered by doing away with portable signs. And yes, there is an enforcement issue with enforcing current bylaws. But - it's always a tough sell to tell the "taxpayer" that taxes need to be increased to hire more bylaw officers. Wouldn't it be better if people just learned to respect bylaws instead?
I think it will do wonders to make our City look less cluttered by doing away with portable signs. And yes, there is an enforcement issue with enforcing current bylaws. But - it's always a tough sell to tell the "taxpayer" that taxes need to be increased to hire more bylaw officers. Wouldn't it be better if people just learned to respect bylaws instead?
-
- Fledgling
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Nov 4th, 2012, 6:43 pm
Re: No more portable signs
....staffing levels and work volume.. ya right. maybe while there at it, gazing at the signs they should look down and register the lack of ditch/drainage maintenance and plugged culverts, register the road lines that are non existent, give em a bag and pick up garbage while their at it. How about enforcing truck routes. Over worked city employees hmmm that's a good one. Sounds like someone at city hall wants to build up their fiefdom.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 8440
- Joined: Mar 24th, 2015, 7:20 pm
Re: No more portable signs
Whyme2 wrote:So would it be ok to stack refrigerators 6 stories high and get away with it?
The discussion is about Kelowna and Kelowna bylaws. Kelowna bylaws have no effect on native land. Native land chiefs allow billboards and make great money from it. Something tells me they won't give it up so easily.
-
- Grand Pooh-bah
- Posts: 2313
- Joined: Feb 22nd, 2009, 11:40 am
Re: No more portable signs
yeeah dont worry about the hobo camps all over town and the whole leon ave mess .its the portable signs that make kelowna look trashy
- Urban Cowboy
- Guru
- Posts: 9556
- Joined: Apr 27th, 2013, 3:47 pm
Re: No more portable signs
TMBOkanagan wrote:I'm not sure how many of you have visited some of the great tourist spots around Canada - such as Whistler for example? They have very strict bylaws about signage in their village and it helps to keep it beautiful. Even the McDonald's had to change their corporate standard sign in order to meet the design guidelines for signs in Whistler.
I think it will do wonders to make our City look less cluttered by doing away with portable signs. And yes, there is an enforcement issue with enforcing current bylaws. But - it's always a tough sell to tell the "taxpayer" that taxes need to be increased to hire more bylaw officers. Wouldn't it be better if people just learned to respect bylaws instead?
What would be better is if people were intelligent enough to expect signs to be abundant in business districts.
What would be better is less bureaucracy and more attention paid to real problems by city officials.
What would be better is less politicians meddling with people's livelihoods by sitting around and dreaming up ways to put up hurdles in their paths.
What would be better is the bureaucrats being intelligent enough to know that every time they put up a roadblock, someone finds a way to circumvent it.
Do you think this bylaw will stop some from advertising by the side of the road? I don't, but I am willing to bet there will be more vehicles or trailers adorned with signage parked so as to continue to advertise.
What will they do then, drum up some law to prohibit parking certain things on lots alongside the highway?
Personally I find the city buses fully covered in graffiti......................... errrrrrrr signage......... to be far more of an assault on the eyes than I do a few temporary signs in commercial areas.
“Not All Those Who Wander Are Lost" - Tolkien
- Anonymous123
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 4323
- Joined: Feb 8th, 2013, 4:02 pm
Re: No more portable signs
Are the buses covered with advertising not "portable signs"?
Be careful when you follow the masses.
Sometimes the M is silent
Sometimes the M is silent
- Bsuds
- The Wagon Master
- Posts: 55084
- Joined: Apr 21st, 2005, 10:46 am
Re: No more portable signs
Anonymous123 wrote:Are the buses covered with advertising not "portable signs"?
Same with all the vehicles with business names on them, big trucks as well. Ban them all!
I got Married because I was sick and tired of finishing my own sentences.
That's worked out great for me!
That's worked out great for me!
- Bsuds
- The Wagon Master
- Posts: 55084
- Joined: Apr 21st, 2005, 10:46 am
Re: No more portable signs
Even Steven wrote: Native land chiefs.
OMG, isn't that word censored now?
I got Married because I was sick and tired of finishing my own sentences.
That's worked out great for me!
That's worked out great for me!
-
- Guru
- Posts: 6844
- Joined: Jun 6th, 2010, 5:40 pm
Re: No more portable signs
I don't have much problem with them.
Today even with those signs is still far better than 20yrs ago when they were literally all over the place the time when Hwy 97 had a string of used car dealers etc. near where the Landmark Buildings stand today.
Today even with those signs is still far better than 20yrs ago when they were literally all over the place the time when Hwy 97 had a string of used car dealers etc. near where the Landmark Buildings stand today.
- lightspeed
- Guru
- Posts: 7037
- Joined: Jan 13th, 2016, 9:58 am
Re: No more portable signs
voice of reason wrote:yeeah dont worry about the hobo camps all over town and the whole leon ave mess .its the portable signs that make kelowna look trashy
Ban carts outside of grocery store parking lots.
Ban camps.
Ban mass accumulations of recycleables.
Ban curbside squats and begging.
Ban loitering.
Ban all the things!!!
"Why does everyone in Kelowna act like they're in Hollywood"
A hermit; a recluse; one of the Okanagan "hill people"
All my haters are less successful than me...
A hermit; a recluse; one of the Okanagan "hill people"
All my haters are less successful than me...
- WalterWhite
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3838
- Joined: Jan 31st, 2017, 3:56 pm
Re: No more portable signs
These bans are getting out of hand. It’s clearly time to ban bans.
- WalterWhite
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3838
- Joined: Jan 31st, 2017, 3:56 pm
Re: No more portable signs
Typical. Gawd forbid a business tries to move a little bit more product through direct marketing - but giant placards of dead fetuses at schools is totally acceptable.