Vernon needs a bypass soon

Post Reply
John500
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2084
Joined: Jun 29th, 2007, 7:20 am

Vernon needs a bypass soon

Post by John500 »

Cant believe all that traffic going right though the middle of town. 2 lanes either way with some left hand turns. Maybe Mayor and council can start by looking into this. Its just crazy. Carbon footprint....ha ha
dg3
Board Meister
Posts: 470
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2011, 9:37 pm

Re: Vernon needs a bypass....soon

Post by dg3 »

the traffic control idiots cant even time the lights properly, i would not trust them planning a bypass.
User avatar
GordonH
Сварливий старий мерзотник
Posts: 39051
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Vernon needs a bypass....soon

Post by GordonH »

Not sure if a bypass is possible, but 32 St could use left turning lanes.
Image

or this

Image
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
Doug Ferguson
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Feb 17th, 2006, 10:34 pm

Re: Vernon needs a bypass....soon

Post by Doug Ferguson »

I think the city council voted to not build a bypass after much debate and planning. I think they even voted to stop purchasing property for the bypass route. Many years ago when the train overpass was built beside polson park on hwy 6, I think they had planned to extend it to provide a one way to the hwy beside the tree farm. This would allow 32 to become a one way south and 27 could be a one way north. This doesn't mean that they would be high speed roads, the trafic lights could be timmed so trucks and cars could travel through at 50km and not have to stop at each intersection. It would also provide 2 turning lanes and 2 lanes for flow through traffic.
dg3
Board Meister
Posts: 470
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2011, 9:37 pm

Re: Vernon needs a bypass....soon

Post by dg3 »

Doug Ferguson wrote: Many years ago when the train overpass was built beside polson park on hwy 6, I think they had planned to extend it to provide a one way to the hwy beside the tree farm. This would allow 32 to become a one way south and 27 could be a one way north. This doesn't mean that they would be high speed roads, the trafic lights could be timmed so trucks and cars could travel through at 50km and not have to stop at each intersection. It would also provide 2 turning lanes and 2 lanes for flow through traffic.

this is what should have been done 10 years ago.
i asked planner why not, they said all the businesses where against it, as traffic would move so easily through town, nobody would stop at their shops.
User avatar
Verminator
Board Meister
Posts: 564
Joined: Feb 8th, 2010, 12:17 pm

Re: Vernon needs a bypass....soon

Post by Verminator »

The cost of a by-pass, either east or west of 97 would be totally prohibitive. The time when it could have been planned and built with the least disruption and cost is long gone, thanks to the typical lack of foresight and common sense of local politicians. Every year the traffic in this town just gets worse. The solutions available at this stage of the game will inevitably be temporary band-aides at best and would probably be more expensive than the original cost of the Western Bypass proposal. It's very sad and disheartening to think what the future holds for Vernon.
I'm completely in favor of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together is certain death.
George Carlin
User avatar
grammafreddy
Chief Sh*t Disturber
Posts: 28548
Joined: Mar 17th, 2007, 10:52 am

Re: Vernon needs a bypass....soon

Post by grammafreddy »

dg3 wrote:i asked planner why not, they said all the businesses where against it, as traffic would move so easily through town, nobody would stop at their shops.


This is probably the real reason there is no bypass. Same in Kelowna. Many, many years ago there was a plan for a bypass around Kelowna but it, too, was killed because the merchants were against it.

It seems to me that if motorists - tourists or locals or truckers - have intentions of stopping in a place, they will do so - even when using a bypass that has connecting roads to get them into the city.

The ones who have no intention of stopping for anything will not be enticed by the signage along the highways on sign boards and store fronts - they are all just through-traffic trying to get out of the town and on to their destination.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
We are a generation of idiots - smart phones and dumb people.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
User avatar
xjeepguy
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17885
Joined: Aug 3rd, 2008, 8:53 am

Re: Vernon needs a bypass....soon

Post by xjeepguy »

dg3 wrote:the traffic control idiots cant even time the lights properly, i would not trust them planning a bypass.



:rate10:


Wow you are so correct . Proper timing would help a bit. I always used 27th , 32 is a bloody nightmare.
When a man opens a car door for his wife, it's either a new car or a new wife
User avatar
Glacier
The Pilgrim
Posts: 40446
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 10:41 pm

Re: Vernon needs a bypass....soon

Post by Glacier »

Yes it does need an overpass! The way BC insists on building roads through the middle of every city is a joke. Instead of pandering to special interest groups (local businesses) they should be looking at the greater good of the entire province.

They have been working on 4-laning highway 97 from Cache Creek to Prince George (some 450 km). The funny thing is that the number of traffic lights keeps going up because 4 laning through another town means that they need to add more lights since it is no longer safe to cross the highway. A lot of people heading up to the BC oil patch head through Alberta (via Grand Prairie) where they actually build divided highways because BC Highway 97 is simply too slow. Same goes for the rest of highway 97...a new light has been added being added in Peachland as we speak, a new light was recently added in Kamloops while a new overpass has been built in West Kelowna. 1 step forward, 2 steps back is what it seems like to me.

4 laning will not fix the problem. Divide, bypass, and overpass if necessary. How hard can that really be?

There is a thread about overhead power lines in the Kelowna section and the point was made about how much more affordable it is to build the infrastructure underground ahead of time than to do it after the fact. The same goes with highway construction. Setting aside land and actually coming up with a long term plan for efficient highways is WAY cheaper than trying to expropriate developed properties after the fact.

check out this thread: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=14473#p363229
"No one has the right to apologize for something they did not do, and no one has the right to accept an apology if the wrong was not done to them."
- Douglas Murray
Post Reply

Return to “Central Okanagan”