Wednesday, June 19th13.8°C

So, a ski hill on a glacier?

B.C. topics.
Moderator for this forum is: Triple 6

Moderators: Jo, jennylives, Triple 6, ferri

Re: So, a ski hill on a glacier?

Postby grammafreddy » Nov 21st, 2012, 12:59 am

That's a minor point. How do ya feel about the way the Liberals have gone about all this - incorporating a new town where there are no residents, no buildings, etc for a ski resort that does not yet exist and which may never exist, and if it did would be about the size of Silver Star - and appointing a new city council for that non-existing town who will have carte blanche to make decisions over all kinds of developments and *ahem* favours to friends and etceteras?
______________________________________________________

A budget should be a savings plan, not a spending plan.
User avatar
grammafreddy
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 25333
Joined: Mar 17th, 2007, 10:52 am

Re: So, a ski hill on a glacier?

Postby Homeownertoo » Nov 21st, 2012, 2:18 am

grammafreddy wrote:
Homeownertoo wrote:Great news. I look forward to riding my skis down its slopes and enjoying its restaurants and condos. A nice addition to the Kootenays amenities.


You approve of the way its gone down so far?

The local are none too pleased.

What locals? I thought this was in the middle of BC's last remaining chunk of wilderness. There will always be naysayers. The issue is, what are the pros and cons from a reasonable point of view.
“Independence from the State does not mean isolation from each other.” -- George W. Bush

“The philosophy of the schoolroom in one generation will be the philosophy of the government in the next.”
User avatar
Homeownertoo
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3665
Joined: Nov 10th, 2008, 2:50 pm

Re: So, a ski hill on a glacier?

Postby Captain Awesome » Nov 21st, 2012, 9:44 am

grammafreddy wrote:How do ya feel about the way the Liberals have gone about all this - incorporating a new town where there are no residents, no buildings, etc for a ski resort that does not yet exist and which may never exist, and if it did would be about the size of Silver Star - and appointing a new city council for that non-existing town who will have carte blanche to make decisions over all kinds of developments and *ahem* favours to friends and etceteras?


I feel absolutely neutral on this. Doesn't strike me as an issue - given the circumstances of middle of nowhere, no people living around, and need for certain elements from legal point of view - municipality, city council, etc.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people
User avatar
Captain Awesome
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 19852
Joined: Jul 22nd, 2008, 5:06 pm
Location: The United Colonies of The Lizard People

Re: So, a ski hill on a glacier?

Postby Rwede » Nov 21st, 2012, 10:22 am

grammafreddy wrote:That's a minor point. How do ya feel about the way the Liberals have gone about all this - incorporating a new town where there are no residents, no buildings, etc for a ski resort that does not yet exist and which may never exist, and if it did would be about the size of Silver Star - and appointing a new city council for that non-existing town who will have carte blanche to make decisions over all kinds of developments and *ahem* favours to friends and etceteras?



You mean planning ahead and putting people in place to do things properly is a bad idea? Okay. :137:
Jo, please don't ban me. I was only 35.
User avatar
Rwede
Guru
 
Posts: 5400
Joined: May 6th, 2009, 10:49 am

Re: So, a ski hill on a glacier?

Postby hobbyguy » Nov 21st, 2012, 11:56 am

I can't figure out the economics of this proposed development. To me, it looks like a "promoter's dream" where the promoter gets rich, and the investors get hammered.

What do you figure they will get per skier day?

Would they be able to exceed the average number of skier days per resort, given that it will likely be pricey and local skiers are 1/3 of the market?

How much would you be willing to spend to ski there?
hobbyguy
Generalissimo Postalot
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Jan 20th, 2011, 9:10 pm

Re: So, a ski hill on a glacier?

Postby grammafreddy » Nov 21st, 2012, 12:08 pm

There is no ski resort. There may never be a ski resort. There's no reason to incorporate a town there yet.
______________________________________________________

A budget should be a savings plan, not a spending plan.
User avatar
grammafreddy
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 25333
Joined: Mar 17th, 2007, 10:52 am

Re: So, a ski hill on a glacier?

Postby Captain Awesome » Nov 21st, 2012, 2:39 pm

hobbyguy wrote:I can't figure out the economics of this proposed development. To me, it looks like a "promoter's dream" where the promoter gets rich, and the investors get hammered.


You'd have to take a look at partnership structure to make those observations, and I don't think they're even hammered out yet, so I wouldn't jump into conclusion here.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people
User avatar
Captain Awesome
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 19852
Joined: Jul 22nd, 2008, 5:06 pm
Location: The United Colonies of The Lizard People

Re: So, a ski hill on a glacier?

Postby SurplusElect » Nov 21st, 2012, 3:09 pm

Waste of money paying salaries considering there is no investors and it will be shut down when the NDP get in power.
SurplusElect
Übergod
 
Posts: 1485
Joined: May 29th, 2012, 1:45 pm

Re: So, a ski hill on a glacier?

Postby Rwede » Nov 21st, 2012, 3:14 pm

SurplusElect wrote:Waste of money paying salaries considering there is no investors and it will be shut down when the NDP get in power.



For once I agree with Bago about the NDP. In fact, the whole province will be shut down IF the NDP get in power.
Jo, please don't ban me. I was only 35.
User avatar
Rwede
Guru
 
Posts: 5400
Joined: May 6th, 2009, 10:49 am

Re: So, a ski hill on a glacier?

Postby grammafreddy » Nov 21st, 2012, 7:09 pm

SurplusElect wrote:Waste of money paying salaries considering there is no investors and it will be shut down when the NDP get in power.


Salaries? How will they pay salaries to anyone? Salaries are paid from charging property taxes on the owners of residential, commercial and industrial lands. There's nothing there. No gazetted lands, no businesses, no industries and no homes. No taxes generated. No salaries - unless the good taxpayers of the whole province step forward and pays these salaries and other expenses (that's you and me courtesy of the provincial government). Hell, there isn't even a city hall to hold a city council meeting in. There is nothing. Just a newly incorporated city that doesn't even have a designated landmass or boundary and a newly provincially-appointed council.

What a friggin' joke.

What is this? The Liberal's last guffaw at us? Their last chance to steal more before they are booted out for all their lies and thievery already? Their last golden opportunity to lay some more gold on some "friend's" palm?

Mind you, I don't think the NDP would do any different, or the Conservatives, either. This was, after all, originally an NDP initiative.
______________________________________________________

A budget should be a savings plan, not a spending plan.
User avatar
grammafreddy
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 25333
Joined: Mar 17th, 2007, 10:52 am

Re: So, a ski hill on a glacier?

Postby SurplusElect » Nov 21st, 2012, 7:20 pm

grammafreddy wrote:Salaries? How will they pay salaries to anyone? No salaries - unless the good taxpayers of the whole province step forward and pays these salaries and other expenses (that's you and me courtesy of the provincial government).

What a friggin' joke.

What is this?Their last golden opportunity to lay some more gold on some "friend's" palm?


You said it.
SurplusElect
Übergod
 
Posts: 1485
Joined: May 29th, 2012, 1:45 pm

Previous

Return to British Columbia

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests