ICBC

Post Reply
my5cents
Guru
Posts: 8377
Joined: Nov 14th, 2009, 2:22 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by my5cents »

jimmy4321 wrote:I'm just amazed that in this day there are people who think there's a valid reason for public insurance .
With the handy dandy world wide web and the cellular telephone it's not hard to varify facts.lol

It's really hard to get the actual facts regarding government auto insurance vs private.

Before ICBC was created by the NDP back in the early 70's, many young people paid extremely high insurance rates and were treated pretty badly for the "offence" of being young.

Personally I remember having my car broken into, the no draft window being smashed. I had had no other claims. The private insurance company refused to renew by policy the next year. So when I went to the next private insurance company for coverage the first thing they ask, "have you ever been turned down for coverage".

The old system of having to obtain three body shop quotes and tendering them to the other guys insurance company. I recall dutifully going around getting the quotes, then submitting them. Returning to the insurance company and picking up the cheque. Seeing that the amount on the cheque was half the lowest quote. Approaching the adjuster "I think you made a mistake, this cheque is for only half the amount". Adjuster, "well that's what you are getting, if you don't like it sue us".

Perhaps private insurance companies don't treat young drivers like that now, but those were the types of reasons that opened the door for government insurance.

I don't see it that onerous that we have to buy the first $200,000 liability coverage from ICBC. After that any and all insurance coverage can be purchased privately.

I’m at a loss how the World Wide Web, or cell phones impact on government vs private insurance.

If you are talking about the ease at which consumers can get quotes on insurance rates, I’ve found that far too many people have no idea what insurance they have purchased, they only know how much it cost. That is especially prevalent when the consuming public and even the media try to compare insurance products from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who haven't got it"
jimmy4321
Guru
Posts: 6844
Joined: Jun 6th, 2010, 5:40 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by jimmy4321 »

My reference to cell phones and internet was a touch of sarcasm.It is a fact that private insurance is cheaper for low risk drivers.True when I had private insurance as a kid I paid high rates but I was a higher risk.Now I paid over 40% less than ICBC because of age and driving history.Isn't that how a business should be run?
Private insurance is just as simplistic as ICBC as far as knowing what you have as far as coverage etc.
I think a lot of people just bought into gov propaganda - facts sometimes are not enough.
User avatar
xjeepguy
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17885
Joined: Aug 3rd, 2008, 8:53 am

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by xjeepguy »

I work out in AB and while killing a few hours waiting for my truck to be ready , I walked into AMA out there and asked about comparable coverage , it was $ 298.00 a year cheaper there , then here at ICBC .

No points
No accidents
No suspensions
When a man opens a car door for his wife, it's either a new car or a new wife
jimmy4321
Guru
Posts: 6844
Joined: Jun 6th, 2010, 5:40 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by jimmy4321 »

$735 Wawanesa Insurance last year Halifax NS
$1300 ICBC This year incl 43% discount

Same coverage, truck another year older.

Not surprised NDP started this joke
User avatar
GordonH
Сварливий старий мерзотник
Posts: 39043
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by GordonH »

jimmy4321 wrote:$735 Wawanesa Insurance last year Halifax NS
$1300 ICBC This year incl 43% discount

Same coverage, truck another year older.

Not surprised NDP started this joke


So jimmy4321 since it was introduced by NDP during 3 year period in early 70's, both Social Credit & Liberals have had over 28 years to remove it. So what is their problem.... that right they don't have one it's a cash cow, until the masses ask for change nothing will happen.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
jimmy4321
Guru
Posts: 6844
Joined: Jun 6th, 2010, 5:40 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by jimmy4321 »

You are correct GordonH. Neither one of those parties are better than the other at turning down easy money, though the master minds of the NDP came up with it.
Still doesn't change the facts, still doesn't make it right.
User avatar
GordonH
Сварливий старий мерзотник
Posts: 39043
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by GordonH »

jimmy4321 wrote:You are correct GordonH. Neither one of those parties are better than the other at turning down easy money, though the master minds of the NDP came up with it.
Still doesn't change the facts, still doesn't make it right.


Only way change will happen is if population/ICBC customers, tell Government they want it open to full competition between public & private.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
jimmy4321
Guru
Posts: 6844
Joined: Jun 6th, 2010, 5:40 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by jimmy4321 »

I think the majority of people in BC are conditioned to accept insurance as it is , it's been 40yrs.
Unlike HST.
User avatar
GordonH
Сварливий старий мерзотник
Posts: 39043
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by GordonH »

jimmy4321 wrote:I think the majority of people in BC are conditioned to accept insurance as it is , it's been 40yrs.
Unlike HST.


So looks like public insurance will continue.

btw I expect to see the HST back, just not with any Federal money this time.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
jimmy4321
Guru
Posts: 6844
Joined: Jun 6th, 2010, 5:40 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by jimmy4321 »

Agree 100%
james-d
Banned
Posts: 667
Joined: May 3rd, 2010, 9:11 am

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by james-d »

One more time for some of you bozos who DO NOT know the true commie when you are staring him in the face!! perhaps you are too young and dumb to know what it means. It means Govt, must own erverything!!!! they decide what is good for you, NOT you. They decide who and what and where you will buy your goods and services from, They were called the ccf years ago for a reason, because of their early affiliations with the communist party types. ICBC is just one example Want some more?\l isten to them scream when rail roads in BC were sold off. Listen to them scream when the govt owns less and less, And that is because they lose control of a cash cow, Now ICBC is a cash cow for whoever is in power, Its; just that smarter govts ,other then the commies use the money for different purposes. I think it should all be privitized, I for one would like to make my own decisions,as to what is best for me. Now do you understand??
User avatar
GordonH
Сварливий старий мерзотник
Posts: 39043
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 7:21 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by GordonH »

james-d wrote:One more time for some of you bozos who DO NOT know the true commie when you are staring him in the face!! perhaps you are too young and dumb to know what it means. It means Govt, must own erverything!!!! they decide what is good for you, NOT you. They decide who and what and where you will buy your goods and services from, They were called the ccf years ago for a reason, because of their early affiliations with the communist party types. ICBC is just one example Want some more?\l isten to them scream when rail roads in BC were sold off. Listen to them scream when the govt owns less and less, And that is because they lose control of a cash cow, Now ICBC is a cash cow for whoever is in power, Its; just that smarter govts ,other then the commies use the money for different purposes. I think it should all be privitized, I for one would like to make my own decisions,as to what is best for me. Now do you understand??


Owning things = commie
So WAC Bennett would be a commie in your eye's, since BC Hydro, BC Ferries, BC Rail & Bank of British Columbia. Were all Crown corporation that his Government established.

Added: I'm a supporter of free enterprise/free market and less Government.

As I mentioned earlier:
GordonH wrote:Only way change will happen is if population/ICBC customers, tell Government they want it open to full competition between public & private.
I don't give a damn whether people/posters like me or dislike me, I'm not on earth to win any popularity contests.
John500
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2084
Joined: Jun 29th, 2007, 7:20 am

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by John500 »

Although I hope eventually it will happen that ICBC has to compete, I am afraid it never will Too great a cash cow for governments to "balance the books" It has nothing to do with insurance anymore for any government. If its such a good idea to have a monopolistic arm lenght government insurance company, why then so many socialist countries like Sweden, Normay, The Neterlands etc dont want to even think about it? They let the market place decide and bad drivers will pay more. Whats wrong with that? Let ICBC compete for all levels of insurance!!
hobbyguy
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 15050
Joined: Jan 20th, 2011, 8:10 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by hobbyguy »

There may be occasional significant differences between Alberta rates, and especially for some primary driving areas. However the fact remains that ICBC is very competitive given the higher risks on BC roads.

http://autos.ca.msn.com/editors-picks/canadas-highest-auto-insurance-rates

10% premium for the more difficult road conditions doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

What does baffle me is Ontario's higher rates - and they are private.

If it ain't broke don't fix it - going private would most likely bring us Ontario's rates or higher - not Alberta's. Of course if you really want to cheap out one could move to Spud island, maybe next door to Duffy would be cheap now...
The middle path - everything in moderation, and everything in its time and order.
User avatar
dudlee
Übergod
Posts: 1338
Joined: Feb 8th, 2008, 1:21 pm

Re: Getting rid of ICBC!

Post by dudlee »

lakevixen wrote:Independent studies by Statistics Canada and the Consumers Association of Canada have shown public auto insurance gives the best value to customers. Since ICBC was established on March 1, 1974, British Columbians have enjoyed reduced insurance fraud, safer roads and lower rates


http://www.campbellrivermirror.com/opin ... 43366.html


Total BS , the only people hat protect ICBC are it's employees and the people that profit from it. The government controls the stats of the corporation that it owns , that it demands that you use . That is a monopoly at best and communism at worst . That's as smart as exporting our heap natural gas , jut to jak the price up o ollect more tax income . Why not refit every vehicle in BC to run on Naturl gas , thus creating jobs and leaning the environment.

Oh , that's right , the people and the environment always come last with Christys playhouse , salary raises for her loyalists always come first
"A lie stated over a long enough period of time, becomes the truth" Adolf Hitler. But I say , "A half truth is a lie and there is always two sides to a story, but only one truth"
Post Reply

Return to “B.C.”