LNG in BC fantasy or reality
- maple leaf
- Grand Pooh-bah
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Nov 6th, 2011, 10:37 am
LNG in BC fantasy or reality
Is Christy Clark being realistic and up front with LNG prospects for BC?
*despite that a link to the article WAS provided, the author is upset that it was not put at the FIRST of the article rather than at the END of the article . . . easiest to simply remove it altogether, lol/Jo*
*despite that a link to the article WAS provided, the author is upset that it was not put at the FIRST of the article rather than at the END of the article . . . easiest to simply remove it altogether, lol/Jo*
“If I were to remain silent, I’d be guilty of complicity.”
— Albert Einstein__________________________
— Albert Einstein__________________________
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10022
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
FANTASY.
Did the voters get sucked in?
Did the voters get sucked in?
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 22985
- Joined: Apr 19th, 2006, 1:33 pm
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
Too bad our provincial government frittered away the last 8 years. That's what happens when you keep kicking the can down the road. Now we're pretty much out of the serious game.
Nab
Nab
- Rwede
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 11728
- Joined: May 6th, 2009, 10:49 am
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
Good thing we didn't elect an NDP government that would outright ban any exploration or development.
"I don't even disagree with the bulk of what's in the Leap Manifesto. I'll put forward my Leap Manifesto in the next election." - John Horgan, 2017.
- logicalview
- Guru
- Posts: 9792
- Joined: Feb 6th, 2006, 3:59 pm
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
George+ wrote:FANTASY.
Did the voters get sucked in?
Not sure if it was getting "sucked in" as opposed to not voting for the weasely-looking dude who flip-flopped on major economic issues and didn't know how to run a campaign. Even if the LNG stuff doesn't pan out as promised, who were we supposed to vote for? The squinty loser who just wanted to say "NO" to every development project without even seeing the proposal? It's a sad state for the NDP that they couldn't even keep their zealots and idiots under control long enough to win an election that had them 20 points ahead. Sad indeed. No one was "sucked in" George, they just really didn't like the smell coming from the other guy. And that's not going to change in 2017.
Not afraid to say "It".
- Hassel99
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3815
- Joined: Aug 23rd, 2012, 9:31 am
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
Christy Clark Heads West To Sell LNG Powered Unicorns
Well well well, unelected Christy Clark is planning another most excellent adventure to Asia
Stopped reading here when the authors agenda became obvious.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10022
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
Hmmmmm... unelected and
no LNG deal.
801?
no LNG deal.
801?
- Urbane
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 22837
- Joined: Jul 8th, 2007, 7:41 pm
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
George+ wrote:Hmmmmm... unelected and
no LNG deal.
801?
- logicalview
- Guru
- Posts: 9792
- Joined: Feb 6th, 2006, 3:59 pm
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
Urbane wrote:Not respecting the premier and underestimating her . . . how did that work out on May 14th George? At least the Liberals have a vision and offer hope as opposed to "We can't," and "No."
and the Liberals know how to win elections, unlike sour grapes George and his band of sore losers. Still going on about 801, what a joke. The only leader that should be sweating giant commie bullets right now is Adrian the Weasel-like flip-flopper. The knives are being sharpened as we speak.
Not afraid to say "It".
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10022
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
Maybe you should READ the article that says the Asians have
Their own LNG.
But go ahead-do what you can for the environment.
Nice to know some people are as conciliatory as ever.
Their own LNG.
But go ahead-do what you can for the environment.
Nice to know some people are as conciliatory as ever.
-
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 4426
- Joined: Oct 27th, 2008, 10:37 am
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
The price of natural gas is going down, way down, over the next few years. And will remain there for a long time. China, which has a lot of deep, inaccessible coal is going into methane gas extraction in a big way. Also the US. There will still be some markets for our natural gas, but the number of terminals will be fewer than Christy boasted about. And the price for the gas will be a lot less. We'll have some jobs, but it won't earn us 56 Trillion or whatever.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10022
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
Whatever!
- Captain Awesome
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 24998
- Joined: Jul 22nd, 2008, 5:06 pm
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
George+ wrote:Hmmmmm... unelected and
no LNG deal.
801?
You mean Christy Clark failed to build an LNG facility in 2 weeks after the elections?
What a fraud! She promised us!
Sarcasm is like a good game of chess. Most people don't know how to play chess.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10022
- Joined: Oct 10th, 2011, 12:08 pm
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
Maybe get the contracts BEFORE building the facilities?
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 545
- Joined: Apr 30th, 2010, 7:29 am
Re: LNG in BC fantasy or reality
If you build it they will come.