BC baby with 3 legal parents breaking new 'family' ground
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Nov 6th, 2013, 8:54 pm
Re: BC baby with 3 legal parents breaking new 'family' groun
My opinion is backed up with logic and common sense yours is based off ignorance and prejudice. You can present no logical reason behind your opinion that only DNA contributors should be on birth certificates which has already been proven to not even be how things are done currently.
the logic and common sense that you brag about is simply a state of your mind and nothing else.People were asked about an opinion as to whom should be included on a BC and I am of the opinion that only the DNA contributors
listing several people on a BC is illogical in my opinion .If you disagree so be it.Does not automatically make you absolute and anyone whom has a different opinion totally void
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Nov 6th, 2013, 8:54 pm
- Oxl3y
- Grand Pooh-bah
- Posts: 2634
- Joined: Jan 5th, 2010, 2:28 pm
Re: BC baby with 3 legal parents breaking new 'family' groun
rvrepairnut wrote:the logic and common sense that you brag about is simply a state of your mind and nothing else.People were asked about an opinion as to whom should be included on a BC and I am of the opinion that only the DNA contributors
listing several people on a BC is illogical in my opinion .If you disagree so be it.Does not automatically make you absolute and anyone whom has a different opinion totally void
So why? You still refuse to offer any reasoning as to why you believe that's how it should be and that inability to back up your opinion is why it is void. The people that make the important decisions, for good or ill, can at least back up their opinions with intelligent arguments which is why these three people were allowed to all be on their child's birth certificate.
[img] obviously too awesome to be displayed
-
- Board Meister
- Posts: 483
- Joined: Nov 6th, 2013, 8:54 pm
Re: BC baby with 3 legal parents breaking new 'family' groun
The people that make the important decisions, for good or ill, can at least back up their opinions with intelligent arguments
again that's all based on personal opinion and I just happen to disagree in the ruling and that they can back up opinion with intelligent arguments?. Again that's an opinion by you
- Sige
- Übergod
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Feb 2nd, 2006, 11:45 am
Re: BC baby with 3 legal parents breaking new 'family' groun
As someone who feels very strongly that kids nowadays need more emotional support and love than ever before...this is AWESOME!!!!!
- Oxl3y
- Grand Pooh-bah
- Posts: 2634
- Joined: Jan 5th, 2010, 2:28 pm
Re: BC baby with 3 legal parents breaking new 'family' groun
*try again without all the personal attacks!*/ferri
Last edited by ferri on Mar 1st, 2014, 7:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: personal attack
Reason: personal attack
[img] obviously too awesome to be displayed
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Apr 20th, 2012, 2:21 pm