Released High Risk Sex Offender Arrested for Murder

[Donald G]

To Free Rights ...

If it was "one bad decision" as you say, I could live with that. Unfortunately it is one bad decision after another, after another, after another by those charged with protecting the public from harm or death by criminals. That is the problem. They have abdicated their responsibility in favour of protecting the rights of the accused against whom a given amount of initial evidence is made available.

THEORETICAL interpretations of the law and criminal court guidelines do not work in the real world. How many more innocent people have to die before Judges and Lawyers accept reality. The Lee family murders, the murdered children in Merritt, the murdered family in Vernon, the lady in Vernon who was shot with a shotgun but survived, the child who was kidnapped, raped and killed in Kelowna to mention just a few "mistakes".

[Donald G]

To Bob Vernon ...

Still living your extreme left wing dream bob? The only time you show up any more is to knock Harper as a person.

Glad you have discovered that PE Trudeau actually existed. Now you should try to discover how PET changed many of our Criminal Code, Privacy Act, Parole Act and Diefenbaker Bill of Rights to match his extreme far left thinking.

Many of the changes resulted in theoretical law taking over from real world law that changed our Criminal Court System from ALL evidence that tended to prove guilt or innocence being admitted to a lawyer enriching theoretical argument over whether or not each piece of evidence should be admitted into evidence. Guilty men, including child murderers, walking free solely because IN THE PERSONAL OPINION OF THE PRESIDING JUDGE the police did something wrong. A later judge hearing the same case may completely disagree with the initial judge and admit the evidence. A police crap shoot.

While you are at it try to find out why he wrote "Democracy does not work" in the margin of his University text book.

[FreeRights]

To Free Rights ...

When the accused offender personally told the authorities he did not feel he could safely be turned loose in society and he is released into society anyway that is evidence that the accused had more rights than the young lady that was murdered.

When our Criminal Court Judges decide that the police acted improperly and let an otherwise guilty person go free, overlooking the fact that doing so brings our system of justice into disrepute, that is evidence that the accused has more rights than the public who thereby loses their protection from that offender. Including turning a person loose who had kidnapped and killed a child a few years back.

The TRUDEAU dictated interpretation of our Canadian Bill of rights by lawyers and judges he personally selected and appointed is IMO at fault. I do not know if TRUDEAU's written direction that the rehabilitation of the prisoner would take precedence over all other considerations or not, but I assume so given the decisions that have been made regarding parole.

It's a debate on semantics, but I can't think of anything in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms that a criminal can do but a victim or the family of victims can not do.

[Donald G]

To FreeRights ...

You do not think that KNOWINGLY turning a self professed HIGH RISK offender loose in society to rape and murder a young lady is a breach of the rights of EVERY person in that society?

You do not agree that turning a KNOWN AND PROVEN child killer or rapist free in society rather than to jail is a breach of the rights of all children and adults in society?

You do not feel that finding that only the police can bring the system of justice into disrepute and lawyers and judges can not is not favouring the rights of the criminal accused over society?

It is in the INTERPRETATION of the rewritten and reinterpreted Bill of Rights by PE Trudeau and his left wing theoretical zealots, including judges that he personally selected and appointed, that the criminal is favoured over the rights of other law abiding people in society. Primarily through the criminal court system.

When a guilty man who is a high risk to society walks free on a theoretical technicality justice is not served and the rights of the criminal trump the rights of society.

PE Trudeau even went so far as to determine that the potential rehabilitation of the criminal would take precedence over ALL OTHER CONSIDERATIONS. To me that includes the safety of the public. He also passed legislation that prohibited the police from viewing a prisoners jail and parole record to determine the risk to society by having the prisoner released.

[Donald G]

To Bob Vernon ...

PE Trudeasu may have disappeared a number of years ago but society is still paying the increased risk that he imposed on society. Primarily by causing the Bill of Rights to be rewritten and reinterpreted by left wing judges that he personally selected and appointed to key positions.

Including the left wing Zealot belief that a mistake by the police means the criminal can go free. Yet judges make one mistake after another with criminal cases and call it an appeal process. Why the huge difference.

Also why can an error by the police result in a finding that the system of justice has been brought into disrepute, when a judge can make any mistakes, including freeing guilty violent criminals on technicalities, and not be found to have brought the system of justice into disrepute?

History will not judge our present Criminal Court System kindly. IMO it is a complete mess that best serves criminals and the financial interests of lawyers rather than the Canadian public.