Jail cell takedown video

[maryjane48]

To lakevixen ...

I take it that you see justice as a competition with a prize? I assume that the prize is taxpayer money. To buy more alcohol and steroids? You live in a weird world of values.

you saying rob was on booze and steroids? he may have been drinking, but it is the cop that was taking riods, the prize is seeing a monster go to jail

[maryjane48]

There must be ESP emanating from the video. People profess to be able to tell if the cop is fabricating a story or telling it the way he honestly sees it from his perspective.

I wonder if previous injuries means previous in this same ongoing altercation or from a previous altercation entirely? Another aspect not clarified. Therefore open to interpretation by people with a confirmed conclusion who are looking for something to support it.

you think the cops are never wrong , period , which is a fantasy world , cops are human, they make mistakes, and sometimes those mistakes are criminal .the problem lies in the fact they dont hardly do the time, just get moved around like pedofile priests

[Donald G]

To lakevixen ...

What you say is true, Cops do make mistakes. There is no evidence to determine whether this SPECIFIC situation is a 'mistake' by a cop or a situation completely brought about by the collective actions of the drunk driver.

[LTD]

Donald g it always amazes me how you can defend the rcmp when there is video evidence of excessive force that is clearly ASSAULT no excuse for throwing that man down and giving him a head injury once again should be fired and charged with assault nothing less .That kind of policing makes them no better than your average gang member .

[maryjane48]

To lakevixen ...

What you say is true, Cops do make mistakes. There is no evidence to determine whether this SPECIFIC situation is a 'mistake' by a cop or a situation completely brought about by the collective actions of the drunk driver.

thats the same as saying a guy comes home, finds his wife in bed with another guy , he shoots them both, but he is not at fault, because if the wife hadn't cheated, no one would have died

[Donald G]

To LTD ...

And it always amazes me that people like yourself can make assumptions and form conclusions based on a small part of the total evidence. Do you not think that what took place immediately before the video started is relevant to what you see on the video?

If I took a video of a street fight and only showed the end where A struck B and knocked them out I could say that the evidence clearly showed that A assaulted by without reason. When the rest of the video may show that A spent ten minutes defending herself from repeated taunts and punches by B.

[Donald G]

To lakevixen ...

Do not see how your example applies at all, at all.

[maryjane48]

To lakevixen ...

Do not see how your example applies at all, at all.

just because a cop is a cop , doesnt mean they can dole out punishment as they see fit . they could have put him in the cell closed the door kept a watch on him with the video cams , they instead chose to beat a drunk person , real heros

[LTD]

Donald g if you find what went on there acceptable you are somewhat troubled the man was handcuffed not to mention there were two other cops there whatever happened before is irrelevant if that cop left after that and pulled you over for speeding and gave ya a few punches to the face because he was still angry would you be ok with that im guessing not. They are trained to deal with stuations just like that and to keep there emotions in check the other two in the cell didnt start kicking and punching the guy that cop was being a bully plain and simple serve and protect not serve and punish

[LoneWolf_53]

Police allege in court documents that there was no wrongdoing and that Wright’s injuries were not caused by RCMP members, but are "attributable to previous and/or subsequent incidents, or congenital defects or pre-existing conditions."

This part is confusing, the video clearly , IMO, appeared to be an accident. Why would an officer have to lie about it.

What the video DOES NOT show clearly is the face and/or area, no way to tell if there was an existing wound from a previous encounter that was reopened.

My take on that, is that the prisoner is claiming a number of things, permanent brain injury for example, that police feel have nothing to do with the incident, and are more likely simply an attempt to cash in.

Consequently they aren't lying, rather they are simply saying the person had issues before they came upon him.

Given that police would know more about this person than us, the position is not out of the realm of possibility.

[A_Britishcolumbian]

the rcmp member that assaults mr. wright in the cell seems to be suffering from some sort of delusion and it is clearly depicted in the video.

notice how the violent member mocks the man while he is unconscious and bleeding on the floor. the cop seems to suffer from a memory lapse as he asks the victim 'what did i say?'. i know very well the rcmp member is responsible for keeping his own notes, and any member that relies on testimony from unconscious individuals, or for that matter expects unconscious individuals to speak in response, is obviously delinquent in his duties and unfit for for those duties.

if a member is incapable of discerning between a conscious person and an unconscious person it would be my opinion that member is unfit for duty.

if the member did not realize that the force he used to smash mr. wright's skull against the concrete was sufficient to render mr. wright unconscious, i would suggest he is unfit to be in the general populace and needs to be detained for the safety of the public.

if the member could not see the criminal nature of his acts against mr. wright then he is again unfit for duty.

if the other two people in the cell with the member did not report the assault then they two are criminals.

[Fancy]

if the member did not realize that the force he used to smash mr. wright's skull against the concrete was sufficient to render mr. wright unconscious

Other documentation states bench or floor - there was uncertainty.

[A_Britishcolumbian]

see fancy, that is a not a lie, just crap words to confuse readers.

there is absolutely no confusion, both the 'bench' and the floor are concrete. no uncertainty about that.

[Fancy]

see fancy, that is a not a lie

Of course it's not.

[the truth]

so the cops take a drunk driver off the road,that could off killed someone,and there the bad guys?????.some of you guys just kill me