Why Clark should not be premier
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 21666
- Joined: Jul 9th, 2005, 8:56 am
Re: Why Clark should not be premier
^^You are being totally silly! The BC liberals have been in power here for going on 16 years!! Anything related to the NDP in power back in the 1990s has absolutely vanished from the political spectrum.
Only a brainwashed ChristyLiberal apologist would attempt this ploy.
Only a brainwashed ChristyLiberal apologist would attempt this ploy.
Chill
- Leifer
- Generalissimo Postalot
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Nov 19th, 2007, 8:43 pm
Re: Why Clark should not be premier
Ouch ouch!
Name calling and everything!
Lol.
How do you know these civil servants where not employed by the ministry back in the 90's during the NDP's watch?
I bet the senior management currently in place have that many years under their belt.
Name calling and everything!
Lol.
How do you know these civil servants where not employed by the ministry back in the 90's during the NDP's watch?
I bet the senior management currently in place have that many years under their belt.
Two essential strategies for success.
1) Never reveal all you know
2)
1) Never reveal all you know
2)
-
- Fledgling
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Dec 19th, 2009, 12:31 am
Re: Why Clark should not be premier
Sounds like some horrifically incompetent civil servants need to lose their jobs.....maybe face criminal charges even?
Sooooo...you think C. Clark should be held personally responsible for these employees?
What if they were hired during the NDP's reign of incompetence?
Should we go track down Glen Clark?[/quote]
Glen Clark lol! another crook maybe he should get together with crooked Christy or maybe they are already related....haha
Sooooo...you think C. Clark should be held personally responsible for these employees?
What if they were hired during the NDP's reign of incompetence?
Should we go track down Glen Clark?[/quote]
Glen Clark lol! another crook maybe he should get together with crooked Christy or maybe they are already related....haha
-
- Guru
- Posts: 7720
- Joined: Apr 19th, 2007, 3:11 pm
Re: Why Clark should not be premier
flamingfingers wrote:^^You are being totally silly! The BC liberals have been in power here for going on 16 years!! Anything related to the NDP in power back in the 1990s has absolutely vanished from the political spectrum.
Only a brainwashed ChristyLiberal apologist would attempt this ploy.
The sad part is that nothing about those NDP and the current NDP has vanished or died, they have the same game plan of no game plan as back then. The fact thier core base of support cannot see this is why everyone else refuses to see them as an option.
- the truth
- Admiral HMS Castanet
- Posts: 33556
- Joined: May 16th, 2007, 9:24 pm
Re: Why Clark should not be premier
clark is are hillary clinton
"The further a society drifts from truth the more it will hate those who speak it." -George Orwell
-
- Guru
- Posts: 8125
- Joined: Nov 25th, 2010, 8:44 am
Re: Why Clark should not be premier
flamingfingers wrote: Even before she became leader of the party, I said she was a brainless, airheaded dingbat and was attacked, villified and insulted for my statements. She has since proven to indeed be a brainless, airheaded dingbat.
You do realize you have a serious credibility problem when you worshiped the ground that Dix walked upon yet the majority of the voters found him to indeed be a brainless, airheaded dingbat. Even a huge number of your socialist leaning brotheren lol. They apparently value jobs over your fixation with Christie's cleavage.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 21666
- Joined: Jul 9th, 2005, 8:56 am
Re: Why Clark should not be premier
^^I never 'worshiped the ground' that ANY politician walked on and I never will. *removed*
Last edited by ferri on Nov 6th, 2016, 7:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: don't make it personal please. thanks!
Reason: don't make it personal please. thanks!
Chill
-
- Guru
- Posts: 8125
- Joined: Nov 25th, 2010, 8:44 am
Re: Why Clark should not be premier
flamingfingers wrote:^It is rather depressing to see that there are people who choose to simply shrug off the actions of a government which resulted in a young man committing suicide.
And it is rather revealing that someone can blame a gov't for a person that commits suicide because he lost his job. Quite obviously this young man had some other underlying mental health issues that he should have sought some counselling on before he made such a tragic and drastic decision? Shall we also blame the Gov't for poor education when certain cultures choose to terminate themselves because they flunk out of school?
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 8125
- Joined: Nov 25th, 2010, 8:44 am
Re: Why Clark should not be premier
flamingfingers wrote:^^I never 'worshiped the ground' that ANY politician walked on and I never will. *removed*
You have thousands of posts on these threads that speak otherwise. You clearly supported Dix. *removed*
Last edited by ferri on Nov 6th, 2016, 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: response to removed remark
Reason: response to removed remark
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 21666
- Joined: Jul 9th, 2005, 8:56 am
Re: Why Clark should not be premier
^^you obviously are informed about very little pertinent to the issue.
Chill