BC hydro exposed

User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17124
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by maryjane48 »

40 million a year for 100 plus years hmmmmm. to truck fish because the designers were in such rush they forgot fish ladders [icon_lol2.gif]
Dizzy1
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 10778
Joined: Feb 12th, 2011, 1:56 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by Dizzy1 »

maryjane48 wrote:i dont want hydro sellling power . i want bills to be lowered . you want sell power build your own dam on your own river with your own money

Sure sounds like the platform for the NDP - we want everything for free but we don't want to pay for it.
Nobody wants to hear your opinion. They just want to hear their own opinion coming out of your mouth.
Dizzy1
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 10778
Joined: Feb 12th, 2011, 1:56 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by Dizzy1 »

Hurtlander wrote:
Also, stop your stupid accusations that the NDP are against site C.... Certainly some NDP supporters are against site C, however many NDP'rs do support site C.

Not according to Maryjane's "facts" - according to her, the 56% of voters who didn't vote Liberals are all against Site C. Her words, not ours.

viewtopic.php?f=26&t=65287&start=2685
maryjane48 wrote:almost 60 percent voted against site c . thats interesting math you use urb :smt045

maryjane48 wrote:56 percent voted against site c . thats where the majority is . :smt045


viewtopic.php?f=26&t=65287&start=2700
maryjane48 wrote:lol techie admits site c is waste of money . good see some honesty out of the harper crowd sonce its so rare . facts are 56 percent voted against site c . no one can change that reality . :130:


And so on and so forth.
Nobody wants to hear your opinion. They just want to hear their own opinion coming out of your mouth.
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17124
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by maryjane48 »

lol do i hear sour whine . facts are almost 60 percent voted against everything clark stood for. the ndp said they send it to bcuc which i have said many times . the greens want to outright stop it . you do the math . even in defeat theres no honor for clarks hanger ons. just excuses and blaming others .


bring on another election . the bclib horse broke its leg and its time to be put out of its misery .
User avatar
Urban Cowboy
Guru
Posts: 9547
Joined: Apr 27th, 2013, 3:47 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by Urban Cowboy »

^^ Alternate facts from someone residing in an alternate reality. :biggrin: Every day is 4/20 in that realm.
“Not All Those Who Wander Are Lost" - Tolkien
hobbyguy
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 15050
Joined: Jan 20th, 2011, 8:10 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by hobbyguy »

MJ - the lack of logic is astounding.

How did Alcan kill a project in 1984 that was proceeding and under construction in 1995 when Mike Harcourt and the NDP cancelled it?

It may well be that Alcan looked at their capital budget, and market forecasts for Aluminum in 1984 and decided to shelve the proposal as a lower priority than other proposals. Companies do that all the time. That does NOT mean they see the project as uneconomic, it relates to prioritizing the available capital for maximum benefit (ah, yes, the NDP don't understand that concept - so no wonder they are confused by it).

And please don't bother to spread the garbage about 60% of people want site C reviewed/closed. We long ago looked into that singular poll that was commissioned as faulty to produce a propaganda result by desmog. It is garbage.

And please do respond the real challenge I have posted numerous times. It is just irrational to be against something for which there is no real alternative.
The middle path - everything in moderation, and everything in its time and order.
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17124
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by maryjane48 »

yea it does hobby and you know it like rafe explained it was all about alcan getting money back . you can believe it or not
User avatar
Urban Cowboy
Guru
Posts: 9547
Joined: Apr 27th, 2013, 3:47 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by Urban Cowboy »

Oh well that explains it. Rafe Mair had an opinion, so naturally that makes it fact based evidence, since it plays into the narrative. :biggrin:
“Not All Those Who Wander Are Lost" - Tolkien
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17124
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by maryjane48 »

Old Techie wrote:Oh well that explains it. Rafe Mair had an opinion, so naturally that makes it fact based evidence, since it plays into the narrative. :biggrin:

and clark says we need it so must be true [icon_lol2.gif] . i dont feel challanged . can you try harder please? :smt045
hobbyguy
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 15050
Joined: Jan 20th, 2011, 8:10 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by hobbyguy »

Yup, a "dead" project in 1984 being built in 1995 speaks for itself. Mikey and the feckless NDP couldn't have killed it because it was "dead" 11 years before - so there was no Kemano 2 project at all.

NDP logic, think in circles and you chase your tail and never accomplish anything except swirl the drain water as the province goes down the drain. But that kinda makes sense from a BC NDP unionist perspective - as everything they ever tried to do turned to mush.
The middle path - everything in moderation, and everything in its time and order.
hobbyguy
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 15050
Joined: Jan 20th, 2011, 8:10 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by hobbyguy »

No MJ, the need for and validity of the site C project has been clearly established by logical thinking and facts.

Could care less who got the project going.

I guess that kinda 'splains the opponents who all seem to have some kind of hate on for premier Clark, they can't digest the facts because they are too caught up in the petty and irrelevant.
The middle path - everything in moderation, and everything in its time and order.
User avatar
Urban Cowboy
Guru
Posts: 9547
Joined: Apr 27th, 2013, 3:47 pm

Re: BC hydro exposed

Post by Urban Cowboy »

*removed*
Last edited by ferri on May 28th, 2017, 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: personal attack
“Not All Those Who Wander Are Lost" - Tolkien
Post Reply

Return to “B.C.”