46203
48176

Transportation of petroleum products

Which method of transportation do you prefer and why?

1) Pipeline
47
94%
2) Railway
0
No votes
3) Tanker
0
No votes
4) Other - please explain
3
6%
 
Total votes : 50

Re: Transportation of petroleum products

Postby Cactusflower » Nov 5th, 2017, 6:10 pm

http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Let me know if you are still unable to watch it, or at least read about it.
Cactusflower
Übergod
 
Posts: 1278
Likes: 583 posts
Liked in: 270 posts
Joined: Aug 27th, 2017, 10:33 pm

Re: Transportation of petroleum products

Postby alanjh595 » Nov 5th, 2017, 6:35 pm

Cactusflower wrote:http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Let me know if you are still unable to watch it, or at least read about it.


BUT the popular vote has spoken.
Capture.JPG


Maybe you can't watch/accept what the MAJORITY want.
User avatar
alanjh595
Generalissimo Postalot
 
Posts: 756
Likes: 227 posts
Liked in: 422 posts
Joined: Oct 20th, 2017, 4:18 pm

Re: Transportation of petroleum products

Postby The Green Barbarian » Nov 5th, 2017, 6:59 pm

Cactusflower wrote:
There you go. Perhaps you shouldn't watch it. It contains too many inconvenient truths. :biggrin:


that's a link - not what I asked for. And who does it have inconvenient truths for? The brainless communists who are against pipelines I hope.
Not sure why I bother with a signature as it seems to just randomly disappear on a regular basis. Especially if it offends liberal snowflakes.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 24136
Likes: 9332 posts
Liked in: 11205 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 8:13 am

Re: Transportation of petroleum products

Postby The Green Barbarian » Nov 5th, 2017, 7:00 pm

Cactusflower wrote:http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Let me know if you are still unable to watch it, or at least read about it.


or you can tell me about it like I asked.
Not sure why I bother with a signature as it seems to just randomly disappear on a regular basis. Especially if it offends liberal snowflakes.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 24136
Likes: 9332 posts
Liked in: 11205 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 8:13 am

Re: Transportation of petroleum products

Postby spooker » Nov 5th, 2017, 8:01 pm

As for those who point out that 94% of the respondents voted for pipelines ... here is something that could apply to how the results were biased by participation ...

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/13/16468902/gun-control-politics-intensity
--
Wise men speak because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. -- Plato

Cactusflower likes this post.
User avatar
spooker
Generalissimo Postalot
 
Posts: 721
Likes: 620 posts
Liked in: 469 posts
Joined: May 12th, 2009, 4:18 pm
Location: Kelowna, BC, CA

Re: Transportation of petroleum products

Postby Cactusflower » Nov 5th, 2017, 8:17 pm

spooker wrote:As for those who point out that 94% of the respondents voted for pipelines ... here is something that could apply to how the results were biased by participation ...

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/13/16468902/gun-control-politics-intensity


Awesome analogy, although I'm afraid the pipeline supporters won't get it.

maryjane48 likes this post.
Cactusflower
Übergod
 
Posts: 1278
Likes: 583 posts
Liked in: 270 posts
Joined: Aug 27th, 2017, 10:33 pm

Previous

Return to B.C.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cactusflower and 5 guests