Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby Cactusflower » Nov 30th, 2017, 1:38 pm

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/kinder- ... -1.4426078

I wonder who they're going to pick for the panel chairperson........CAPP's CEO?
Cactusflower
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3596
Likes: 1717 posts
Liked in: 750 posts
Joined: Aug 27th, 2017, 11:33 pm

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby maryjane48 » Nov 30th, 2017, 1:42 pm

Actualy cactus i think the feds dont want the pipeline go through as they could just force it on us.i see it more of making it harder to point transmountain will give up .

I could be wrong. But its a possibilty

Merry likes this post.
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17124
Likes: 10586 posts
Liked in: 2666 posts
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby The Green Barbarian » Nov 30th, 2017, 2:04 pm

Cactusflower wrote:http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/kinder-morgan-conflict-resolution-1.4426078

I wonder who they're going to pick for the panel chairperson........CAPP's CEO?


Let's hope so. Then this pipeline can get built and all of the enviro-lunatics that want to destroy the economy can move to Venezuela.
"Socialists sure are a lot dumber today than they were when I was alive" - John Stuart Mill

JT - he's been ready since 2015, to be the puppet of Gerald Butts and the Laurentide Elite.

3 people like this post.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 28578
Likes: 12366 posts
Liked in: 16440 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby maryjane48 » Nov 30th, 2017, 2:22 pm

Lets see what actualy happens cactus .funny its just me and you in this thread.

Cactusflower likes this post.
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17124
Likes: 10586 posts
Liked in: 2666 posts
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby The Green Barbarian » Nov 30th, 2017, 4:58 pm

*removed*
Last edited by ferri on Nov 30th, 2017, 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Personal attack.
"Socialists sure are a lot dumber today than they were when I was alive" - John Stuart Mill

JT - he's been ready since 2015, to be the puppet of Gerald Butts and the Laurentide Elite.

Jflem1983 likes this post.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 28578
Likes: 12366 posts
Liked in: 16440 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby Cactusflower » Nov 30th, 2017, 5:27 pm

maryjane48 wrote:Lets see what actualy happens cactus .funny its just me and you in this thread.


You and me and GB. [icon_lol2.gif]
Cactusflower
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3596
Likes: 1717 posts
Liked in: 750 posts
Joined: Aug 27th, 2017, 11:33 pm

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby christopher » Dec 1st, 2017, 2:19 pm

Pipe line companies are busy sending BC natural gas down to the new LNG plants in the gulf they will get back on this after thats done.
christopher
Fledgling
 
Posts: 307
Likes: 567 posts
Liked in: 225 posts
Joined: Jun 9th, 2016, 10:10 pm

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby maryjane48 » Dec 1st, 2017, 2:25 pm

christopher wrote:Pipe line companies are busy sending BC natural gas down to the new LNG plants in the gulf they will get back on this after thats done.

Thats fine . Im not against lng just building plants in salmon estuarys
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17124
Likes: 10586 posts
Liked in: 2666 posts
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby Merry » Dec 1st, 2017, 2:29 pm

maryjane48 wrote:Actualy cactus i think the feds dont want the pipeline go through as they could just force it on us.i see it more of making it harder to point transmountain will give up .

I could be wrong. But its a possibilty

I agree with you mj; if the Feds truly supported this project they could (and should) simply override all the local and provincial objections.

By trying to "play both sides of the fence" they risk losing the support of everyone on all sides of this argument. It's time Trudeau comes clean and stands up for what he believes in, instead of lying to everybody about what his true intentions are.
"In a world swathed in political correctness, the voting booth remains the final sanctuary where the people are free to speak" - Clifford Orwin

2 people like this post.
User avatar
Merry
Guru
 
Posts: 7588
Likes: 5392 posts
Liked in: 5135 posts
Joined: Nov 2nd, 2008, 12:41 pm

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby Snman » Dec 1st, 2017, 4:04 pm

Looks to me like the feds are too gutless to force the issue so they appoint a 'panel' to do the dressing down for them, thus not offending anyone because in this kinder, gentler and all inclusive Canada we now have that just won't do. Pipeline will be built, no question. Tree huggers, stomp your feet all you like but it won't help.

alanjh595 likes this post.
Snman
√úbergod
 
Posts: 1056
Likes: 1194 posts
Liked in: 784 posts
Joined: Aug 6th, 2006, 6:27 am

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby christopher » Dec 1st, 2017, 4:30 pm

I have always said JT picked this pipeline to go ahead because he thought BC would stop it. I do think if it is stopped it will fuel the Western Separatist, Many here will say who cares, go pound sand, empty threats etc. But I belive that this pipeline has more riding on it then people think.

Merry likes this post.
christopher
Fledgling
 
Posts: 307
Likes: 567 posts
Liked in: 225 posts
Joined: Jun 9th, 2016, 10:10 pm

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby hobbyguy » Dec 1st, 2017, 4:39 pm

Actually, this makes some sense. The NEB as the approval body is too close to the issue. The federal Cabinet made the ultimate approval decision.

Having an "arm's length" dispute resolution and compliance panel seems quite reasonable.

Jim Carr is doing the BC NDP and Derek Corrigan a big favor by heading in this direction. It provides them a way out of their stupidity. Will they be bright enough to accept that way out? We'll see. In demovictions Derek's case - I doubt it.
Dimples - "just not ready"
hobbyguy
Guru
 
Posts: 8652
Likes: 2431 posts
Liked in: 9244 posts
Joined: Jan 20th, 2011, 9:10 pm

Re: Ottawa wants panel to resolve conflicts

Postby Merry » Dec 1st, 2017, 7:28 pm

I disagree HG; at the end of the day "the buck stops" with the Federal Government. The final decision is theirs, as it should be.

This is no longer a decision based on facts, but one based on politics and emotion. Which means it has to be elected officials who decide, not government appointed panels.

Whichever way Trudeau jumps, as PM he needs to be accountable for the decision made. Not simply try passing the buck to someone else.
"In a world swathed in political correctness, the voting booth remains the final sanctuary where the people are free to speak" - Clifford Orwin

2 people like this post.
User avatar
Merry
Guru
 
Posts: 7588
Likes: 5392 posts
Liked in: 5135 posts
Joined: Nov 2nd, 2008, 12:41 pm


Return to B.C.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest