Ajax rejected

Ajax rejected

Postby maryjane48 » Dec 14th, 2017, 3:22 pm

https://www.castanet.net/news/Kamloops/ ... -Ajax-mine

More fall out from being forced to allow site c.sad but i called it .theres going to be more choices. Folks backing the dam wont like
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17124
Likes: 10586 posts
Liked in: 2669 posts
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby alanjh595 » Dec 14th, 2017, 4:13 pm

Where in that article does it even come close to mentioning Site C?
Here is the entire article for everyone's review.

The B.C. government has rejected the deeply controversial KGHM Ajax mine in Kamloops.

The company proposed to build a 1,700-hectare open-pit copper and gold mine about 10 kilometres southwest of the city on the traditional territories of area First Nations.

The environmental assessment office found that “taken as a whole, the potential, and in many cases significant, adverse effects of the Ajax project outweighed the potential benefits.”

A government news release cites 53 residual and cumulative adverse effects to environmental, economic, social, heritage and health values in the area. Additionally, “significant adverse effects” to indigenous land usage was noted.

“Given these conclusions and the close proximity of Ajax to the City of Kamloops, particularly the neighbourhood of Aberdeen, including an elementary school, the ministers concluded the adverse effects would not likely be mitigated to an acceptable level and would therefore present an unacceptable risk,” the news release continues.

The mine was met with fierce opposition from many local residents, including formally by the municipality itself.
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.

2 people like this post.
User avatar
alanjh595
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 4466
Likes: 1679 posts
Liked in: 2661 posts
Joined: Oct 20th, 2017, 5:18 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby maryjane48 » Dec 14th, 2017, 5:14 pm

They wont admit it but the fact they put first nations concerns clearly in spot light suggests. It . Clark did the same in regards,to her donors .its called politics
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17124
Likes: 10586 posts
Liked in: 2669 posts
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby maryjane48 » Dec 14th, 2017, 7:27 pm

Tk’emlúps First Nation Chief Fred Seymour says aboriginals have never and will never give up their rights and title to the land.

“Tk’emlúps te Secwepemc leadership is exuberant that the British Columbia government have chosen not to issue an environmental certificate.”

The Secwepemc people commissioned an independent review of the KGHM Ajax proposal with its results prompting First Nations opposition to the project.


:smt045
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17124
Likes: 10586 posts
Liked in: 2669 posts
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Jflem1983 » Dec 14th, 2017, 7:28 pm

I was hoping this mine would get built. Im sure the reasons given for not building are all valid. Still a bit of a let down
Now they want to take our guns away . That would be just fine. Take em away from the criminals first . Ill gladly give u mine. "Charlie Daniels"

You have got to stand for something . Or you will fall for anything "Aaron Tippin"

Trumpeter likes this post.
User avatar
Jflem1983
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 4445
Likes: 9602 posts
Liked in: 2517 posts
Joined: Aug 23rd, 2015, 11:38 am

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Urbane » Dec 14th, 2017, 7:57 pm

    maryjane48 wrote:https://www.castanet.net/news/Kamloops/214057/Province-rejects-Ajax-mine

    More fall out from being forced to allow site c.sad but i called it .theres going to be more choices. Folks backing the dam wont like
Fake news! Kamloops City Council came out against the Ajax Mine, a group of physicians were working hard to kill the project, and the community was divided. I suspect that the previous Liberal government might well have stopped the project as well. We'll never know but the decision had nothing to do with Site C.
"Spectemur agendo"

7 people like this post.
User avatar
Urbane
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 20997
Likes: 8705 posts
Liked in: 10685 posts
Joined: Jul 8th, 2007, 7:41 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby JagXKR » Dec 14th, 2017, 9:09 pm

maryjane48 wrote:More fall out from being forced to allow site c


Nothing whatsoever to do with Site C. *removed*
Last edited by ferri on Dec 15th, 2017, 7:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Making it personal
Why use a big word when a diminutive one will suffice.

6 people like this post.
User avatar
JagXKR
Übergod
 
Posts: 1091
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 881 posts
Joined: Jun 19th, 2011, 6:25 am
Location: Penticton

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby maryjane48 » Dec 14th, 2017, 10:58 pm

Prove it had nothing to do with it . I said he be doing some tough choices bclibs wont like .
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17124
Likes: 10586 posts
Liked in: 2669 posts
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Loki2u » Dec 14th, 2017, 11:36 pm

At least I'll be able to fish Jacko Lake still! :biggrin:
You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. -Harlan Ellison-

maryjane48 likes this post.
Loki2u
Fledgling
 
Posts: 290
Likes: 300 posts
Liked in: 344 posts
Joined: Aug 24th, 2014, 7:09 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby christopher » Dec 14th, 2017, 11:52 pm

maryjane48 wrote:Tk’emlúps First Nation Chief Fred Seymour says aboriginals have never and will never give up their rights and title to the land.

“Tk’emlúps te Secwepemc leadership is exuberant that the British Columbia government have chosen not to issue an environmental certificate.”

The Secwepemc people commissioned an independent review of the KGHM Ajax proposal with its results prompting First Nations opposition to the project.


:smt045


Another missed opportunity for FN people.

3 people like this post.
christopher
Fledgling
 
Posts: 304
Likes: 566 posts
Liked in: 218 posts
Joined: Jun 9th, 2016, 10:10 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Cactusflower » Dec 15th, 2017, 12:43 am

Mining companies have a sordid history in B.C. since 2001. In just one example, Imperial Metals knew they could get away with bypassing environmental assessments by slipping thousands of dollars into the BC Liberal war chest. They were even allowed to re-open the Mt. Polley mine operation without ever taking any responsibility for the environmentally disastrous results of their tailings pond breach. Guess who's paying for that? The BC taxpayers, that's who.

Now Ajax is surprised that the NDP have rejected another mining disaster in the making? Well, boo :cuss: hoo!
Cactusflower
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3540
Likes: 1701 posts
Liked in: 742 posts
Joined: Aug 27th, 2017, 11:33 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby christopher » Dec 15th, 2017, 10:07 am

Now Ajax is surprised that the NDP have rejected another mining disaster in the making? Well, boo :cuss: hoo

Rejected another chance to have good tax paying jobs for years, a chance for FN people, a chance for workers to stay at home rather than work away from home, a chance for service business to grow. Good job by the NDP

2 people like this post.
christopher
Fledgling
 
Posts: 304
Likes: 566 posts
Liked in: 218 posts
Joined: Jun 9th, 2016, 10:10 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Rwede » Dec 15th, 2017, 10:23 am

The N in NDP stands for NO!
"I don't even disagree with the bulk of what's in the Leap Manifesto. I'll put forward my Leap Manifesto in the next election." - John Horgan, 2017.

christopher likes this post.
User avatar
Rwede
Walks on Forum Water
 
Posts: 11728
Likes: 9542 posts
Liked in: 5120 posts
Joined: May 6th, 2009, 10:49 am
Location: is everything!

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby The Green Barbarian » Dec 15th, 2017, 10:30 am

Cactusflower wrote:Mining companies have a sordid history in B.C. since 2001.


LOL - more alarmist nonsense. They have a sordid history since 2001 when BC finally ended the last NDP reign of terror of creating thousands of jobs and generating billions of dollars for the BC economy. That's how this works. The brainless NDP and the lunatic fringe Greens just never get that.
Not all leftists are stupid, but most stupid people are leftists.
- Dr. Don Boys

Trumpeter likes this post.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 27735
Likes: 11852 posts
Liked in: 15694 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Queen K » Dec 15th, 2017, 11:43 am

Yes, GB, agreed. That is how it works. Usually. But the FN asserted themselves. And if they open their own mine, under their own company, and scale it back from the built up areas, maybe it'd be approved and provide jobs? Maybe?

Rwede wrote:The N in NDP stands for NO!


How are you doing with the Site C go-ahead?

GB, Rwede, Ajax mine was simply too close to the public domain, infrastructure, buildings, including schools.
I'm over 50, I'm full of rage lately, I have two axes and I have a huge tree stump that needs to come out. Any questions?
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
 
Posts: 52598
Likes: 11916 posts
Liked in: 12468 posts
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 12:39 pm
Location: What? You mean here?

Next

Return to B.C.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: burnedatstake, CommonCrawl [Bot] and 0 guests