46695
47833

Ajax rejected

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby UhHuhYeahSure » Dec 15th, 2017, 11:00 am

Cactusflower wrote:Mining companies have a sordid history in B.C. since 2001. In just one example, Imperial Metals knew they could get away with bypassing environmental assessments by slipping thousands of dollars into the BC Liberal war chest. They were even allowed to re-open the Mt. Polley mine operation without ever taking any responsibility for the environmentally disastrous results of their tailings pond breach. Guess who's paying for that? The BC taxpayers, that's who.

Now Ajax is surprised that the NDP have rejected another mining disaster in the making? Well, boo :cuss: hoo!


Cactusflower... Do you even know what is mine tailings? A soup of "toxic sludge" as Global TV continued to report months after the spill? Full of poisons that killed fish and birds and antelope in every direction? A scourge that will last for decades and result in 3 eyed frogs for centuries?

Educate yourself. Mine tailings is crushed and pulverized rock. At Mt Poly, it's quartz and feldspar and biotite. It's sand! The minerals that could be considered toxic have been taken out. That's what mines do. Take minerals out of rock and leave...sand. The water quality in the tailings is better than many communities drinking water.

The cost incurred in "cleaning up" the mud was nothing more than government imposed protocol in placating eco-hysteria ignorance and a sense of tidy English Garden wilderness mentality.

Mt Polly was a mud flow...nothing more, nothing less. It's powdered rock. But just because it came from a mine (BTW, that employed over 300 people at wages most people reading this would drool over), it's evil, wicked and nasty. If it had come down a hillside all by itself, well, that's just nature.

And it's only the conservative nature of the mining industry that stops them from taking the media to court to sue their axes off for reporting pure fabricated drama and ignoring the science and the truth.

Mining in BC is sooooo over regulated based on bleatings of the PERCEPTIONS of an ill guided and ignorant population. It takes on average 15 years from the date of discovery to the first metal produced to get a mine into production. All of that time is spent satisfying truckloads of ecological, social and native regulations.

Well...actually it did take 15 years. Serious mining companies have left the province and gone to countries that welcome the technology, ecological research, workplace safety mentality, taxation and training and income it provides their people.

YeahYeahSureSure...go ahead and spew the "pillage and plunder" ignorant rhetoric of investing hundreds of millions of dollars in other countries. If you really believe that, at least just keep buying all the metal products now provided from those countries to keep the mining companies happy.

In the meantime, BC is off to a rosy future of growing and smoking legal pot and returning land to a native population that thinks it can live in the past.
Everything I say to you is a lie. And that's the truth.

6 people like this post.
User avatar
UhHuhYeahSure
Board Meister
 
Posts: 368
Likes: 2 posts
Liked in: 84 posts
Joined: Jun 16th, 2008, 10:18 am
Location: Right here.

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Rwede » Dec 15th, 2017, 11:05 am

Queen K wrote:How are you doing with the Site C go-ahead?


Poorly. The hundreds of millions of dollars in wasted money from Horgan's political delay is something I'll never get over.
"I don't even disagree with the bulk of what's in the Leap Manifesto. I'll put forward my Leap Manifesto in the next election." - John Horgan, 2017.

2 people like this post.
User avatar
Rwede
Walks on Forum Water
 
Posts: 11728
Likes: 9542 posts
Liked in: 5115 posts
Joined: May 6th, 2009, 9:49 am
Location: is everything!

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby JagXKR » Dec 15th, 2017, 11:35 am

maryjane48 wrote:https://www.castanet.net/news/Kamloops/214057/Province-rejects-Ajax-mine

More fall out from being forced to allow site c.sad but i called it .theres going to be more choices. Folks backing the dam wont like

Prove it had nothing to do with it


There is nothing about Site C in the link you posted. The story has nothing to do with Site C. Your supposition is incorrect as the article is about another subject that never talks about Site C.
The proof is in the article. Or should I say what is not in the article.
Why use a big word when a diminutive one will suffice.

The Green Barbarian likes this post.
User avatar
JagXKR
Generalissimo Postalot
 
Posts: 782
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 605 posts
Joined: Jun 19th, 2011, 5:25 am
Location: Penticton

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby The Green Barbarian » Dec 15th, 2017, 11:37 am

UhHuhYeahSure wrote:
Cactusflower... Do you even know what is mine tailings? A soup of "toxic sludge" as Global TV continued to report months after the spill? Full of poisons that killed fish and birds and antelope in every direction? A scourge that will last for decades and result in 3 eyed frogs for centuries?

Educate yourself. Mine tailings is crushed and pulverized rock. At Mt Poly, it's quartz and feldspar and biotite. It's sand! The minerals that could be considered toxic have been taken out. That's what mines do. Take minerals out of rock and leave...sand. The water quality in the tailings is better than many communities drinking water.


They know the truth, they just don't care, because it doesn't support the idiotic fear-mongering narrative.
3.7 cents kwh in alberta is a lie. The science is settled - wind turbines suck.

Not all leftists are stupid, but most stupid people are leftists.
User avatar
The Green Barbarian
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 24964
Likes: 9916 posts
Liked in: 12148 posts
Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 8:13 am

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Queen K » Dec 15th, 2017, 12:19 pm

Rwede wrote:
Queen K wrote:How are you doing with the Site C go-ahead?


Poorly. The hundreds of millions of dollars in wasted money from Horgan's political delay is something I'll never get over.


I get that. Carry on.
If you have castanet friends on your facebook friend list, set your privacy setting on the friend list as "Only me." Just call, "Nagging Internet Wife" for all your problem nemesis'.
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
 
Posts: 50000
Likes: 10009 posts
Liked in: 10717 posts
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 11:39 am
Location: What? You mean here?

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby alanjh595 » Dec 15th, 2017, 12:31 pm

maryjane48 wrote:Prove it had nothing to do with it . I said he be doing some tough choices bclibs wont like .


That's not the way things work. You prove that this had something to do with Site C. The link that was supplied by yo had no mention of Site C contained in it, therefore the burden of proof now rests entirely upon the shoulders of the one who made the statement/accusation.

I went through the effort to do a little research to find a 271 page document that the reasons for the rejection was based upon, you and all others can read it together here:
http://ajaxmine.ca/wp-content/themes/wp ... report.pdf

Out of the 271 pages contained in that report, aboriginals got 3 pages dedicated to them.

For your ease of reading, here is what the aboriginals concerns. Complete with Section numbers for those that might have issues with reading such large documents.

3.4 ABORIGINAL INTERESTS
3.4.1 Aboriginal culture and history
3.4.1.1 Description of Issue
Commenters reported that local Aboriginal people are concerned about potential negative effects of
the mine on Jacko Lake and its traditional spring fishery, sacred grounds, heritage and artifacts
within the mine footprint.


It's on page 64.

If you can find something in that report, anywhere in that report, that pertains to Site C, by all means, PLEASE point it out for all of us to read.

Queen K likes this post.
User avatar
alanjh595
Übergod
 
Posts: 1585
Likes: 535 posts
Liked in: 1028 posts
Joined: Oct 20th, 2017, 4:18 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby alanjh595 » Dec 15th, 2017, 12:35 pm

I might add that report was written in February 2017. Long before the NDP came into power.
User avatar
alanjh595
Übergod
 
Posts: 1585
Likes: 535 posts
Liked in: 1028 posts
Joined: Oct 20th, 2017, 4:18 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Ka-El » Dec 15th, 2017, 1:34 pm

Queen K wrote: Ajax mine was simply too close to the public domain, infrastructure, buildings, including schools.

Indeed. Absolutely nothing to do with Site "C"
“One of the biggest challenges we have to our democracy is the degree to
which we don’t share a common baseline of facts” - Barack Obama 2018

2 people like this post.
User avatar
Ka-El
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3817
Likes: 1843 posts
Liked in: 3022 posts
Joined: Oct 18th, 2015, 8:19 am

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Queen K » Dec 15th, 2017, 4:00 pm

AND, everything to do with this as well as close to infrastructure:

"The Ajax Mine Project in its proposed location at Pípsell (Jacko Lake and area) is in opposition to the Stk'emlupsemc Te Secwepemc Nation's (SSN) land use objective for this culturally important and historically significant keystone site which significance is fundamental and undiminished said a statement from the SSN.

Kukpi7 Wayne Christian and Secwepemc leaders, communities and members stand in solidarity with SSN in their Pípsell Decision. In June 2017, together with the Secwepemc Nation, the Pípsell area was declared a Secwepemc Cultural Heritage Site signifying the importance of this area’s connection to Secwepemc Law.

“These decisions showcase the importance of standing up our families and traditional Secwepemc laws in our territories. When we govern our lands from a place that respects both our ancestral knowledge and western science the best decisions can be made for us all. This is really about standing our ancestors voices back up again, breathing life into the UN declaration and protecting Mother Earth for future generations,” said Christian."


So, before everyone freaks about the ^^ above, think about this for a moment: Before Interior Health Officials have a meeting what is supposed to be said is a "thank you to First Nations for the Unceded Land that IH is now allowed to carry on their activity on."

Yes, this really is a "thing."
If you have castanet friends on your facebook friend list, set your privacy setting on the friend list as "Only me." Just call, "Nagging Internet Wife" for all your problem nemesis'.
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
 
Posts: 50000
Likes: 10009 posts
Liked in: 10717 posts
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 11:39 am
Location: What? You mean here?

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Jflem1983 » Dec 15th, 2017, 4:14 pm

Guess they wanted even more money.
We don't reach for handouts we reach for those who are down . "Garth Brooks "

You have got to stand for something . Or you will fall for anything "Aaron Tippin"
MAKE ALBERTA GREAT AGAIN
User avatar
Jflem1983
Grand Pooh-bah
 
Posts: 2933
Likes: 4817 posts
Liked in: 1649 posts
Joined: Aug 23rd, 2015, 10:38 am

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Cactusflower » Dec 15th, 2017, 4:16 pm

UhHuhYeahSure wrote:
Cactusflower wrote:Mining companies have a sordid history in B.C. since 2001. In just one example, Imperial Metals knew they could get away with bypassing environmental assessments by slipping thousands of dollars into the BC Liberal war chest. They were even allowed to re-open the Mt. Polley mine operation without ever taking any responsibility for the environmentally disastrous results of their tailings pond breach. Guess who's paying for that? The BC taxpayers, that's who.

Now Ajax is surprised that the NDP have rejected another mining disaster in the making? Well, boo :cuss: hoo!


Cactusflower... Do you even know what is mine tailings? A soup of "toxic sludge" as Global TV continued to report months after the spill? Full of poisons that killed fish and birds and antelope in every direction? A scourge that will last for decades and result in 3 eyed frogs for centuries?

Educate yourself. Mine tailings is crushed and pulverized rock. At Mt Poly, it's quartz and feldspar and biotite. It's sand! The minerals that could be considered toxic have been taken out. That's what mines do. Take minerals out of rock and leave...sand. The water quality in the tailings is better than many communities drinking water.

The cost incurred in "cleaning up" the mud was nothing more than government imposed protocol in placating eco-hysteria ignorance and a sense of tidy English Garden wilderness mentality.

Mt Polly was a mud flow...nothing more, nothing less. It's powdered rock. But just because it came from a mine (BTW, that employed over 300 people at wages most people reading this would drool over), it's evil, wicked and nasty. If it had come down a hillside all by itself, well, that's just nature.

And it's only the conservative nature of the mining industry that stops them from taking the media to court to sue their axes off for reporting pure fabricated drama and ignoring the science and the truth.

Mining in BC is sooooo over regulated based on bleatings of the PERCEPTIONS of an ill guided and ignorant population. It takes on average 15 years from the date of discovery to the first metal produced to get a mine into production. All of that time is spent satisfying truckloads of ecological, social and native regulations.

Well...actually it did take 15 years. Serious mining companies have left the province and gone to countries that welcome the technology, ecological research, workplace safety mentality, taxation and training and income it provides their people.

YeahYeahSureSure...go ahead and spew the "pillage and plunder" ignorant rhetoric of investing hundreds of millions of dollars in other countries. If you really believe that, at least just keep buying all the metal products now provided from those countries to keep the mining companies happy.

In the meantime, BC is off to a rosy future of growing and smoking legal pot and returning land to a native population that thinks it can live in the past.


I've heard that old mining corporation promise before...."You won't play ball my way so I'm taking my bat and ball and leaving!" They never do, though. They have very deep pockets and don't mind spending years in litigation.

How's that Fish Lake mine (what's it called again?) coming along, BTW? :biggrin:
Cactusflower
Übergod
 
Posts: 1796
Likes: 797 posts
Liked in: 403 posts
Joined: Aug 27th, 2017, 10:33 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Queen K » Dec 15th, 2017, 4:27 pm

Maybe it wasn't about the money this time. :D
If you have castanet friends on your facebook friend list, set your privacy setting on the friend list as "Only me." Just call, "Nagging Internet Wife" for all your problem nemesis'.

Jflem1983 likes this post.
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
 
Posts: 50000
Likes: 10009 posts
Liked in: 10717 posts
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 11:39 am
Location: What? You mean here?

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Walking Wounded » Dec 15th, 2017, 4:35 pm

maryjane48 wrote:Prove it had nothing to do with it . I said he be doing some tough choices bclibs wont like .

Your the one making ridiculous statements so it is up to you to prove it had anything to do with site c. *removed*
Last edited by ferri on Dec 15th, 2017, 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Making it personal

2 people like this post.
User avatar
Walking Wounded
Generalissimo Postalot
 
Posts: 767
Likes: 3721 posts
Liked in: 1008 posts
Joined: Aug 23rd, 2009, 10:25 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby christopher » Dec 15th, 2017, 4:52 pm

I've heard that old mining corporation promise before...."You won't play ball my way so I'm taking my bat and ball and leaving!" They never do, though. They have very deep pockets and don't mind spending years in litigation.

Is that not what you said about the LNG people.

Jflem1983 likes this post.
christopher
Fledgling
 
Posts: 144
Likes: 292 posts
Liked in: 110 posts
Joined: Jun 9th, 2016, 9:10 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby alanjh595 » Dec 15th, 2017, 5:45 pm

christopher wrote:I've heard that old mining corporation promise before...."You won't play ball my way so I'm taking my bat and ball and leaving!" They never do, though. They have very deep pockets and don't mind spending years in litigation.

Is that not what you said about the LNG people.


We all know how that went.

christopher likes this post.
User avatar
alanjh595
Übergod
 
Posts: 1585
Likes: 535 posts
Liked in: 1028 posts
Joined: Oct 20th, 2017, 4:18 pm

PreviousNext

Return to B.C.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests