51336

Ajax rejected

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby maryjane48 » Dec 15th, 2017, 7:13 pm

John himself said when announcing site c he was going to move on other areas . I know bclibs wont like the choices more than i dislike site c but its the world we live in now .

He said himself he wants to implement un declaration on first nations. That includes not buildung mines on their land unless they want it there . It isnt rocket science to figure out why this mine and teasko one rejected :smt045
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17124
Likes: 10586 posts
Liked in: 2665 posts
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Trumpeter » Dec 15th, 2017, 8:20 pm

600 jobs, 600 jobs, 600 full time jobs!!!
Lots of big mines in Canada where the mine is right in town so 10 km away should have been no problem.
Just another NDP anti business anti job brain fart.

4 people like this post.
Trumpeter
 
Posts: 6
Likes: 17 posts
Liked in: 5 posts
Joined: Sep 24th, 2014, 8:45 am

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Cactusflower » Dec 15th, 2017, 9:23 pm

Trumpeter wrote:600 jobs, 600 jobs, 600 full time jobs!!!
Lots of big mines in Canada where the mine is right in town so 10 km away should have been no problem.
Just another NDP anti business anti job brain fart.


Jobs should never trump the environment. All we've heard from our federal and provincial politicians is, "We can't have a strong economy without a healthy environment." Yet when the BC government rejects a mine because they can't pass the environmental assessment test, all we hear from the usual Castanet suspects are howls of indignation.

Get with the program, guys, or move back to Alberta where they don't care about the environment. (I heard on the news tonight that Jason Kenney won his seat in the by-election back there. If you hurry, you can be back there in time to vote for the TBP again).

Omnitheo likes this post.
Cactusflower
Grand Pooh-bah
 
Posts: 2844
Likes: 1349 posts
Liked in: 612 posts
Joined: Aug 27th, 2017, 11:33 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby maryjane48 » Dec 15th, 2017, 9:25 pm

Trumpeter wrote:600 jobs, 600 jobs, 600 full time jobs!!!
Lots of big mines in Canada where the mine is right in town so 10 km away should have been no problem.
Just another NDP anti business anti job brain fart.

Its native land .you want mine in your land get to digging
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17124
Likes: 10586 posts
Liked in: 2665 posts
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Veovis » Dec 15th, 2017, 11:31 pm

maryjane48 wrote:John himself said when announcing site c he was going to move on other areas . I know bclibs wont like the choices more than i dislike site c but its the world we live in now .

He said himself he wants to implement un declaration on first nations. That includes not buildung mines on their land unless they want it there . It isnt rocket science to figure out why this mine and teasko one rejected :smt045


I don't think John aspires to your level of vengeance. He may make biased decisions however not for the reasons you desire. You want vengeance for losing against something you disliked, however the choices aren't one vs the other at this point. He may have made the wrong choice that you support, but not for simple hate as you want.
Veovis
Guru
 
Posts: 5665
Likes: 831 posts
Liked in: 3805 posts
Joined: Apr 19th, 2007, 3:11 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Jflem1983 » Dec 16th, 2017, 11:39 am

maryjane48 wrote:
Trumpeter wrote:600 jobs, 600 jobs, 600 full time jobs!!!
Lots of big mines in Canada where the mine is right in town so 10 km away should have been no problem.
Just another NDP anti business anti job brain fart.

Its native land .you want mine in your land get to digging



Maybe the natives need to move along. After all they were always moving around before white people came and built a country .
Now they want to take our guns away . That would be just fine. Take em away from the criminals first . Ill gladly give u mine. "Charlie Daniels"

You have got to stand for something . Or you will fall for anything "Aaron Tippin"

3 people like this post.
User avatar
Jflem1983
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3490
Likes: 6852 posts
Liked in: 2010 posts
Joined: Aug 23rd, 2015, 11:38 am

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Urban Cowboy » Dec 16th, 2017, 12:15 pm

Veovis wrote:
maryjane48 wrote:John himself said when announcing site c he was going to move on other areas . I know bclibs wont like the choices more than i dislike site c but its the world we live in now .

He said himself he wants to implement un declaration on first nations. That includes not buildung mines on their land unless they want it there . It isnt rocket science to figure out why this mine and teasko one rejected :smt045


I don't think John aspires to your level of vengeance. He may make biased decisions however not for the reasons you desire. You want vengeance for losing against something you disliked, however the choices aren't one vs the other at this point. He may have made the wrong choice that you support, but not for simple hate as you want.


Johnny would appear to be attracting fair weather supporters, given that just a short week ago, to listen to them, you'd have to believe he could walk on water, now after the Site C decision he's the devil, so that flip flopping will likely keep manifesting itself in many of the things he does, or doesn't do.

More "doesn't" would be my guess. :biggrin:
"Never try to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and it annoys the pig."
- Robert A. Heinlein

2 people like this post.
User avatar
Urban Cowboy
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3559
Likes: 3284 posts
Liked in: 5138 posts
Joined: Apr 27th, 2013, 3:47 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Cactusflower » Dec 16th, 2017, 12:23 pm

Any government that had an iota of concern for our environment would have rejected the Ajax proposal. That thing was akin to the Alberta tar sands, albeit on a smaller scale. BTW, why has no one answered my question about the Taseko mine saga up at Fish Lake?
Cactusflower
Grand Pooh-bah
 
Posts: 2844
Likes: 1349 posts
Liked in: 612 posts
Joined: Aug 27th, 2017, 11:33 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby maryjane48 » Dec 16th, 2017, 12:32 pm

Lol only in bclibs is there high drama. John said what his plans were . Its fairly straight forward .i was,for ajax as i had stated before . But i suggested why he said no . Clark could have said yes but she didnt .
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 17124
Likes: 10586 posts
Liked in: 2665 posts
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Trumpeter » Dec 16th, 2017, 8:17 pm

Cactusflower wrote:
Trumpeter wrote:600 jobs, 600 jobs, 600 full time jobs!!!
Lots of big mines in Canada where the mine is right in town so 10 km away should have been no problem.
Just another NDP anti business anti job brain fart.


Jobs should never trump the environment. All we've heard from our federal and provincial politicians is, "We can't have a strong economy without a healthy environment." Yet when the BC government rejects a mine because they can't pass the environmental assessment test, all we hear from the usual Castanet suspects are howls of indignation.

Get with the program, guys, or move back to Alberta where they don't care about the environment. (I heard on the news tonight that Jason Kenney won his seat in the by-election back there. If you hurry, you can be back there in time to vote for the TBP again).


Jobs always Trump Stupidity!
Trumpeter
 
Posts: 6
Likes: 17 posts
Liked in: 5 posts
Joined: Sep 24th, 2014, 8:45 am

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Jlabute » Dec 16th, 2017, 8:30 pm

Rwede wrote:The N in NDP stands for NO!



Hahaha, and with Horgan and Weaver together, the DP stands for double-p..... to us all.
I do diligence and sometimes diligence does me.
User avatar
Jlabute
Übergod
 
Posts: 1409
Likes: 722 posts
Liked in: 858 posts
Joined: Jan 18th, 2009, 2:08 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby twobits » Dec 16th, 2017, 10:04 pm

maryjane48 wrote:Prove it had nothing to do with it . I said he be doing some tough choices bclibs wont like .


*removed*
Last edited by ferri on Dec 17th, 2017, 7:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Baiting
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.

4 people like this post.
twobits
Guru
 
Posts: 6257
Likes: 605 posts
Liked in: 2631 posts
Joined: Nov 25th, 2010, 9:44 am
Location: GPS says Dead Elbow Utah. Think I'm lost

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Cactusflower » Dec 16th, 2017, 10:08 pm

Trumpster wrote: "Jobs always Trump Stupidity." I wonder if putting 'Trump' and 'stupidity' in the same sentence was a Freudian slip? Those two words really do belong together though. Trump is the only leader (and I use that term loosely) on the planet who would be stupid enough to approve the Ajax dam.
Cactusflower
Grand Pooh-bah
 
Posts: 2844
Likes: 1349 posts
Liked in: 612 posts
Joined: Aug 27th, 2017, 11:33 pm

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Jflem1983 » Dec 17th, 2017, 9:53 am

So sad the mine got cancelled. Just think of all the jobs lost. For what.
Now they want to take our guns away . That would be just fine. Take em away from the criminals first . Ill gladly give u mine. "Charlie Daniels"

You have got to stand for something . Or you will fall for anything "Aaron Tippin"

2 people like this post.
User avatar
Jflem1983
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3490
Likes: 6852 posts
Liked in: 2010 posts
Joined: Aug 23rd, 2015, 11:38 am

Re: Ajax rejected

Postby Jlabute » Dec 17th, 2017, 11:51 am

500 FT jobs and 1200 jobs during the 2 year construction period. Sad to see them go. It could have been an opportunity for the chronically unemployed to make a good clean living in the Kamloops wastescape.

“Environment Minister George Heyman said the potential for significant adverse effects of the Ajax mine included poor air quality and risk to human health.” Another decision to please the Green Party and environmentalists... although the excuse is not the environment, but culture and harm to humans. George Heyman was executive director of the Sierra Club and is an environmental socialist nutjob who believes in something that does not exist, catastrophic climate change.
Last edited by Jlabute on Dec 17th, 2017, 1:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I do diligence and sometimes diligence does me.

3 people like this post.
User avatar
Jlabute
Übergod
 
Posts: 1409
Likes: 722 posts
Liked in: 858 posts
Joined: Jan 18th, 2009, 2:08 pm

PreviousNext

Return to B.C.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests