51807
47658

1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby johnrae » Jan 31st, 2018, 12:23 pm

https://www.castanet.net/news/BC/217683 ... 1422-lives

"The coroner says there appears to be more overdose deaths in the five days after income assistance payments are issued"

1422 people x $900/month = 1,260,000 per month. Wow , that's a lot of money that could be given to people who want help. And that money savings doesn't include the healthcare costs, policing costs, ambulance costs and the drug shoot up clinics. Wow, I could go on and on and on but I am on my lunch break. See , I am working and paying taxes to pay for this crap. I am gonna get eaten alive by the snowflake Liberals ,but please just sit back and think about the numbers. This might be a good thing. :200:
johnrae
Fledgling
 
Posts: 116
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 130 posts
Joined: Sep 2nd, 2014, 11:30 am

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby Hassel99 » Jan 31st, 2018, 12:27 pm

Your math is wrong due to the faulty assumption that all deaths were those on social assistance.

Queen K likes this post.
User avatar
Hassel99
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3251
Likes: 913 posts
Liked in: 2682 posts
Joined: Aug 23rd, 2012, 8:31 am

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby TreeGuy » Jan 31st, 2018, 12:38 pm

The coroner says four out of five of those who died were male.


The feminist should keep this in mind when screaming for equal rights. Its not all roses being male.

dirtybiker likes this post.
User avatar
TreeGuy
Moderator
 
Posts: 2009
Likes: 928 posts
Liked in: 1906 posts
Joined: Oct 9th, 2005, 9:02 pm
Location: Westbank

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby johnrae » Jan 31st, 2018, 12:38 pm

Hassel99 wrote:Your math is wrong due to the faulty assumption that all deaths were those on social assistance.


My math is probably way off. I have no idea how much of my tax money we give them per month to sit in City Park and shoot up. You are correct.
Sorry :hailjo:

2 people like this post.
johnrae
Fledgling
 
Posts: 116
Likes: 3 posts
Liked in: 130 posts
Joined: Sep 2nd, 2014, 11:30 am

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby Queen K » Jan 31st, 2018, 1:01 pm

johnrae wrote:
Hassel99 wrote:Your math is wrong due to the faulty assumption that all deaths were those on social assistance.


My math is probably way off. I have no idea how much of my tax money we give them per month to sit in City Park and shoot up. You are correct.
Sorry :hailjo:


Your assumptions are wrong too.

If you've spent a few minutes in various OD threads in the Bickering Room you would learn that the majority of od deaths are in the home, not public places.
Terror Twins Inc. Catsumi and QK, at your disposal. We take Bitcoin. Applications to be our accountant and lawyer presently accepted.

On-line Gossip: Unless you have proof, all you have is slander and libel.
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
 
Posts: 50766
Likes: 10653 posts
Liked in: 11261 posts
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 11:39 am
Location: What? You mean here?

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby Queen K » Jan 31st, 2018, 1:02 pm

Another wrong assumption is that none of those over 1400 people work, as in have jobs or are self employed.

So many wrong assumptions in one thread.
Terror Twins Inc. Catsumi and QK, at your disposal. We take Bitcoin. Applications to be our accountant and lawyer presently accepted.

On-line Gossip: Unless you have proof, all you have is slander and libel.
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
 
Posts: 50766
Likes: 10653 posts
Liked in: 11261 posts
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 11:39 am
Location: What? You mean here?

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby dirtybiker » Jan 31st, 2018, 1:08 pm

Queen K wrote:Another wrong assumption is that none of those over 1400 people work, as in have jobs or are self employed.

So many wrong assumptions in one thread.


I'll make an assumption that it was posted with the tongue firmly placed
in the cheek to get a rise out of people.

Kicks.
"Don't 'p' down my neck then tell me it's raining!"
dirtybiker
Guru
 
Posts: 6137
Likes: 4735 posts
Liked in: 2531 posts
Joined: Mar 8th, 2008, 6:00 pm
Location: Central OK

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby Queen K » Jan 31st, 2018, 1:09 pm

dirtybiker wrote:
Queen K wrote:Another wrong assumption is that none of those over 1400 people work, as in have jobs or are self employed.

So many wrong assumptions in one thread.


I'll make an assumption that it was posted with the tongue firmly placed
in the cheek to get a rise out of people.

Kicks.


That might be a good assumption right there. :130:
Terror Twins Inc. Catsumi and QK, at your disposal. We take Bitcoin. Applications to be our accountant and lawyer presently accepted.

On-line Gossip: Unless you have proof, all you have is slander and libel.
User avatar
Queen K
Queen of the Castle
 
Posts: 50766
Likes: 10653 posts
Liked in: 11261 posts
Joined: Jan 31st, 2007, 11:39 am
Location: What? You mean here?

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby TheBoss » Jan 31st, 2018, 1:42 pm

How many people thought they were getting something like Coke, mdma etc etc. Those people who thought they were getting one drug could of infact been getting a product laced with fetanyl (spelling). Wasn't their a couple who passed away in their home, used what they thought was cocaine turned out out to be laced with fetanyl. Sometimes it's just a complete accident.
TheBoss
Fledgling
 
Posts: 146
Likes: 11 posts
Liked in: 72 posts
Joined: Jan 2nd, 2010, 9:39 pm

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby Nedroj » Jan 31st, 2018, 2:08 pm

TheBoss wrote:How many people thought they were getting something like Coke, mdma etc etc. Those people who thought they were getting one drug could of infact been getting a product laced with fetanyl (spelling). Wasn't their a couple who passed away in their home, used what they thought was cocaine turned out out to be laced with fetanyl. Sometimes it's just a complete accident.


There is no "Accident" when it comes to this. Everyone and their grandma should know by now, there is a huge issue with chemical based drugs being laced with Fent/Carfent and whatever else. If you keep using then you are taking that risk knowing full well the consequences of it. We all have the ability to choose our path. I have ZERO sympathy for these people that knowingly use hard drugs with the risks associated with it. I do have sympathy for their family and friends that are left wondering why.

Its about time we start throwing the repeat offending drug addicts in mandatory rehab instead of jail. Addiction is not an excuse to commit crime and get away with it. If you commit a crime the law will send you to jail, so why cant we send them to rehab?
'I hear and I forget, I see and I remember, I do and I understand' - Confucius

Ken7 likes this post.
Nedroj
 
Posts: 93
Likes: 52 posts
Liked in: 104 posts
Joined: Apr 10th, 2014, 1:36 pm

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby GordonH » Jan 31st, 2018, 2:09 pm

Of the 1422 who were recreational drug users should impo have chosen a different recreation long before their passing.
As I've said before, if you play with fire sooner or later you will get burnt.

My condolences to all of Families & Friends of those who are gone.

Ken7 likes this post.
User avatar
GordonH
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 19105
Likes: 2012 posts
Liked in: 6397 posts
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 6:21 pm
Location: Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby Sparki55 » Jan 31st, 2018, 2:16 pm

^^^ legalized drugs would have saved the majority of those lives lost. If the government really cared they wouldn't ban things that people are willing to lose their life over to consume. See thread om decriminalization of all drugs.
Sparki55
Fledgling
 
Posts: 342
Likes: 357 posts
Liked in: 278 posts
Joined: Feb 24th, 2013, 1:38 pm

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby GordonH » Jan 31st, 2018, 2:27 pm

Sparki55 wrote:legalized drugs would have saved the majority of those lives lost. If the government really cared they wouldn't ban things that people are willing to lose their life over to consume. See thread om decriminalization of all drugs.


impo what would save lives is going after those who are & continuing to push opioid based pain killers. Fully knowing the huge risk of addiction & dependence.
User avatar
GordonH
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 19105
Likes: 2012 posts
Liked in: 6397 posts
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 6:21 pm
Location: Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby Glacier » Jan 31st, 2018, 2:44 pm

So I was a BC Housing building the other day in which tax payers pumped in several million to make it nice and modern for low income housing types to live in. Many of the tenants suffer from drug and alcohol addiction, which is sad, but I had to laugh when I saw the "shopping cart" of one of the residents. I should have taken a picture. It read something like, "my landlord stole my money to buy crack, and kicked me out." LOL, no, tax payers just spend several million to give you a place to live in.

Queen K likes this post.
User avatar
Glacier
Admiral HMS Castanet
 
Posts: 26172
Likes: 2570 posts
Liked in: 8356 posts
Joined: Jul 6th, 2008, 9:41 pm

Re: 1422 Overdose deaths- Tax payer money savings?

Postby GordonH » Jan 31st, 2018, 2:54 pm

Sparki55 wrote:legalized drugs would have saved the majority of those lives lost. If the government really cared they wouldn't ban things that people are willing to lose their life over to consume. See thread om decriminalization of all drugs.

GordonH wrote:impo what would save lives is going after those who are & continuing to push opioid based pain killers. Fully knowing the huge risk of addiction & dependence.

Follow up
Better form of pain killer is needed (come July 1 one will be legalized). I'm not a fan of smell from smoking (it really stinks), there are non-smoking version of taking MJ.
If I had to take a pain killer (stronger then Tylenol) I would opt for MJ first (I would not smoke it though), if that did the job why go for a pill
User avatar
GordonH
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 19105
Likes: 2012 posts
Liked in: 6397 posts
Joined: Oct 4th, 2008, 6:21 pm
Location: Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning

Next

Return to B.C.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 2manyfords, Carrs Landing Viking, Jhunter199, johnny24, Jx3, mshowalter and 9 guests