Terrorist Shooting at Parliament

[Thinktank]

billion Muslims on earth.

although it's not the greatest religion out there and brainwashes it's people
they aren't monsters.

[FreeRights]

I imagine there's a bit too much truth in the article for you to accept, FreeRights...you should be wondering why that is.

Quite the opposite, really. That article provides a lot of comparisons and allegations, but doesn't offer even one single hint of evidence to support it's theory. In fact, the examples of false flag operations that it does compare to are also utterly unproven to be false flags at all. It's okay if you'd like to essentially buy-in to any unproven theory constructed only of rhetoric, but please don't expect anybody else to.

[peaceseeker]

I imagine there's a bit too much truth in the article for you to accept, FreeRights...you should be wondering why that is.

Quite the opposite, really. That article provides a lot of comparisons and allegations, but doesn't offer even one single hint of evidence to support it's theory. In fact, the examples of false flag operations that it does compare to are also utterly unproven to be false flags at all. It's okay if you'd like to essentially buy-in to any unproven theory constructed only of rhetoric, but please don't expect anybody else to.

Government agents 'directly involved' in most high-profile US terror plots
July 21, 2014, The Guardian (One of the UK's leading newspapers)
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/j ... ots-report

Nearly all of the highest-profile domestic terrorism plots in the United States since 9/11 featured the "direct involvement" of government agents or informants, a new report says. Some of the controversial "sting" operations "were proposed or led by informants", bordering on entrapment by law enforcement. Yet the courtroom obstacles to proving entrapment are significant, one of the reasons the stings persist. The lengthy report, released on [July 21] by Human Rights Watch, raises questions about the US criminal justice system's [respect for] civil rights and due process in post-9/11 terrorism cases. [The report] portrays a system that features not just the sting operations but secret evidence, anonymous juries, extensive pretrial detentions and convictions significantly removed from actual plots. "In some cases the FBI may have created terrorists out of law-abiding individuals by suggesting the idea of taking terrorist action or encouraging the target to act," the report alleges. Out of the 494 cases related to terrorism the US has tried since 9/11, the plurality of convictions ... are not for thwarted plots but for "material support" charges, a broad category expanded further by the 2001 Patriot Act that permits prosecutors to pursue charges with tenuous connections to a terrorist act or group. Several cases featured years-long solitary confinement for accused terrorists before their trials. Some defendants displayed signs of mental incapacity. Jurors for the 2007 plot to attack the Fort Dix army base, itself influenced by government informants, were anonymous, limiting defense counsel's ability to screen out bias.

Note: Why was this important news not picked up by any major US media? For more on this, see concise summaries of deeply revealing intelligence agency operations news articles from reliable major media sources.

[FreeRights]

Government agents 'directly involved' in most high-profile US terror plots
July 21, 2014, The Guardian (One of the UK's leading newspapers)
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/j ... ots-report

Nearly all of the highest-profile domestic terrorism plots in the United States since 9/11 featured the "direct involvement" of government agents or informants, a new report says. Some of the controversial "sting" operations "were proposed or led by informants", bordering on entrapment by law enforcement. Yet the courtroom obstacles to proving entrapment are significant, one of the reasons the stings persist. The lengthy report, released on [July 21] by Human Rights Watch, raises questions about the US criminal justice system's [respect for] civil rights and due process in post-9/11 terrorism cases. [The report] portrays a system that features not just the sting operations but secret evidence, anonymous juries, extensive pretrial detentions and convictions significantly removed from actual plots. "In some cases the FBI may have created terrorists out of law-abiding individuals by suggesting the idea of taking terrorist action or encouraging the target to act," the report alleges. Out of the 494 cases related to terrorism the US has tried since 9/11, the plurality of convictions ... are not for thwarted plots but for "material support" charges, a broad category expanded further by the 2001 Patriot Act that permits prosecutors to pursue charges with tenuous connections to a terrorist act or group. Several cases featured years-long solitary confinement for accused terrorists before their trials. Some defendants displayed signs of mental incapacity. Jurors for the 2007 plot to attack the Fort Dix army base, itself influenced by government informants, were anonymous, limiting defense counsel's ability to screen out bias.

Note: Why was this important news not picked up by any major US media? For more on this, see concise summaries of deeply revealing intelligence agency operations news articles from reliable major media sources.

Thanks for your time. Government agents were involved, which is why the vast majority of "US terror plots since 9/11" didn't happen.