Is this waiter criminally responsible?

User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 17124
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm

Re: Is this waiter criminally responsible?

Post by maryjane48 »

It was on the menu flamming
User avatar
Hassel99
Lord of the Board
Posts: 3815
Joined: Aug 23rd, 2012, 9:31 am

Re: Is this waiter criminally responsible?

Post by Hassel99 »

maryjane48 wrote:There is a precident . A waitress was convicted of serving peanuts in a cake to a customer who asked if it had peanuts .


Convicted? You best read the article again, I look forward to your retraction.
dontrump
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2623
Joined: Feb 20th, 2016, 10:39 am

Re: Is this waiter criminally responsible?

Post by dontrump »

http://news.nationalpost.com/life/food- ... od-allergy

This whole story leaves out so much here.There are no interviews with the guys boss or the waiter himself. this puff cake litigant sounds like the a little loose around the edges
Iam of the opinion this whole deal is being handled in the wrong way
User avatar
Always Sunny
Grand Pooh-bah
Posts: 2368
Joined: Oct 24th, 2009, 7:00 pm

Re: Is this waiter criminally responsible?

Post by Always Sunny »

I first read the CBC article in which the diner states:

"With the dim lighting, it's not easy to tell the difference between two dishes, especially if they use mayonnaise. It can be confusing," Canuel said.

I ain't no Wolfgang Puck. But I think mayo in my BEEF tartare would be a red flag I hadn't received what I ordered.
User avatar
JLives
Buddha of the Board
Posts: 23084
Joined: Nov 27th, 2004, 10:53 am

Re: Is this waiter criminally responsible?

Post by JLives »

I have never had a tartare of any sort and wouldn't know one from another. That doesn't mean I wouldn't order it to try it out though.
"Every dollar you spend is a vote for what you believe in."
"My country is the world, and my religion is to do good."
LANDM
Walks on Forum Water
Posts: 11639
Joined: Sep 18th, 2009, 11:58 am

Re: Is this waiter criminally responsible?

Post by LANDM »

flamingfingers wrote:
'Salmon tartare" regardless is RAW FISH - whether in a dip or not. Beef (steak) tatare is a whole different animal. Perhaps the customer was so unsophisticated that he seemed not to know the difference.

BTW - I have dined out considerably and have NEVER seen 'beef (steak) tartare presented as a 'dip' for ANYTHING. Ick - RAW beef in a sauce for dipping your veggies in? GROSS!!


No, dontrump was talking about tartar sauce, which is a commonly used condiment for fish. I think he figured it out and edited his post with the explanation.
You are correct, beef or salmon tartare is minced raw meat.....with other stuff usually.
You and 71 others Like this post
Post Reply

Return to “Canada”