2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
-
- Generalissimo Postalot
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Jun 13th, 2014, 11:01 am
2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
Attendance by Canada at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference was a complete waste of time and money, as according to the following environmental organization, Trudeau is already reneging on the promises made there:
http://action.environmentaldefence.ca/p ... _KEY=19459
Therefore, what was the reason for sending all those people there, and spending all that money, other than feel good photo ops for our Prime Minster?
http://action.environmentaldefence.ca/p ... _KEY=19459
Therefore, what was the reason for sending all those people there, and spending all that money, other than feel good photo ops for our Prime Minster?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 7715
- Joined: Apr 19th, 2007, 3:11 pm
Re: 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
Good PR? Image? TV time, photos. Everything a reality TV star needs to keep in the spotlight and not actually work.
- dieseluphammerdown
- Guru
- Posts: 5255
- Joined: Apr 23rd, 2009, 8:31 am
Re: 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
It goes with the reoccurring theme of liberal self entitlements.
Plus how could JT and crew miss such a big party? After all it wasn't him or the liberals footing the bill it was just us taxpayers, so that in itself is justification enough for the liberals.
Plus how could JT and crew miss such a big party? After all it wasn't him or the liberals footing the bill it was just us taxpayers, so that in itself is justification enough for the liberals.
This message brought to you by a proud old stock Canadian.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Id love to spit some beechnut in that dudes eyes
And shoot him with my old 45
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Id love to spit some beechnut in that dudes eyes
And shoot him with my old 45
- The Green Barbarian
- Insanely Prolific
- Posts: 85954
- Joined: Sep 16th, 2010, 9:13 am
Re: 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
Remember Kathleen Wynne flew not once, but twice to Paris for this UN party. She is that important.
"The woke narcissists who make up the progressive left are characterized by an absolute lack of such conscience, but are experts at exploiting its presence in others." - Jordan Peterson
-
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 15050
- Joined: Jan 20th, 2011, 8:10 pm
Re: 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference
It may just be a dose of pragmatism crept in.
The pragmatic approach is to stick with what is doable. From what I have read, we are just a few years from a number of game changing technologies that will make it practical and cost effective to start a serious switch off of fossil fuels.
In the meantime, Alberta can not afford to be "kicked while they are down". They need some breathing room to adjust.
So backing down on an unrealistically high target is probably good policy, provided it is accompanied by building out the necessary infrastructure for the future. Most notably for EVs, which are likely to replace 2+ million bpd of oil in the next 8-10 years. The new fleet efficiency targets from the US, EU and China will also have a huge impact, probably dropping the market for oil by a similar amount.
IF the government were to fund the build out of EV charging stations and perhaps more nuclear power for Ontario... now that would move things forward, but the actual immediate GHG reductions would be minimal.
And the federal government is going to have to put some money back into Alberta to help them transition. Again, without much immediate, but a significant long term benefit.
The pragmatic approach is to stick with what is doable. From what I have read, we are just a few years from a number of game changing technologies that will make it practical and cost effective to start a serious switch off of fossil fuels.
In the meantime, Alberta can not afford to be "kicked while they are down". They need some breathing room to adjust.
So backing down on an unrealistically high target is probably good policy, provided it is accompanied by building out the necessary infrastructure for the future. Most notably for EVs, which are likely to replace 2+ million bpd of oil in the next 8-10 years. The new fleet efficiency targets from the US, EU and China will also have a huge impact, probably dropping the market for oil by a similar amount.
IF the government were to fund the build out of EV charging stations and perhaps more nuclear power for Ontario... now that would move things forward, but the actual immediate GHG reductions would be minimal.
And the federal government is going to have to put some money back into Alberta to help them transition. Again, without much immediate, but a significant long term benefit.
The middle path - everything in moderation, and everything in its time and order.