400 kids rescued

[maryjane48]

http://symbolofstrength.info/2017/09/25 ... rn-empire/


The head of Toronto’s Sex Crimes Unit said they enlisted the help of the United States Postal Inspection Service since many of the videos were being exported to the U.S. and began a joint investigation. After a seven-month long investigation, officers executed search warrants across the city of Toronto including at the business of Brian Way.

[Queen K]

Trying to wrap my head around this one.

400 children where living where? 400? And being systematically abused?

Where did 400 unreported children come from? Are they all reported as being "missing"? Surely there is id somehow associated with all of them. Somewhere.

Are they all Canadians? Smuggled into the country? No one said anything? Most small schools don't even have 400 kids.

Some explaining needs done as does the penal code need up dating to include a death penalty for Brian May and his ilk.

[whitecandle]

Robert Cribb
Foreign
Tues., May 12, 2015

Brian Way officially became Canada’s most prolific and infamous child pornographer on Tuesday.

The 43-year-old Torontonian, who has been behind bars for four years on charges of possessing, publishing and selling videos of naked, pre-pubescent and pubescent boys, received a clear verdict from Ontario Superior Court Judge Julie Thorburn: “guilty.”

In all, Way was convicted on 15 of 16 charges and now awaits sentencing on what could be a lengthy prison term.

The films included images of young boys in the nude, wrestling, posing provocatively and acting out scenarios that included close-up shots of their genitals.

The Star’s exclusive interviews with young Romanian boys featured in some of Way’s videos confirmed they were duped by Way’s filmmaker partner, Markus Roth, into being on film without knowing their images would be sold around the world.

Most spoke of being humiliated and ostracized in the small northern villages where they live.

Thorburn ruled that about 60 of the 176 films presented as evidence against Way met Canada’s legal definition of child pornography, in that they featured “lengthy nude scenes,” “the camera zoomed in on the genitals,” “there was no reason in the storyline for nudity” and they showed “sexualized poses.”

One film, for example, had a 48-minute nude scene featuring, in part, a young boy, “slowly and seductively savouring a greasy chicken while moaning, sucking and licking his lips.”

https://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2015 ... arges.html