Here we go again: another missing airplane
- maryjane48
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 17124
- Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm
Here we go again: another missing airplane
Officials now say 162 people were on board the AirAsia plane that went missing after leaving Indonesia for Singapore. Search and rescue operations are underway.
The Airbus A320 was last heard from at about 7:30 a.m. local time, when the crew contacted air traffic control in Jakarta. It was believed to be over the Java Sea between Kalimantan and Java islands when it disappeared.
http://www.castanet.net/news/World/1296 ... 2-on-board
The Airbus A320 was last heard from at about 7:30 a.m. local time, when the crew contacted air traffic control in Jakarta. It was believed to be over the Java Sea between Kalimantan and Java islands when it disappeared.
http://www.castanet.net/news/World/1296 ... 2-on-board
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 12102
- Joined: Mar 25th, 2012, 5:05 pm
Re: here we go again
I am not an aviation expert by any means but wonder why a plane would not be reported missing for a half an hour?
- maryjane48
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 17124
- Joined: May 28th, 2010, 7:58 pm
Re: here we go again
yes its a web weaved by who knows . im stunned this is happening again and now they saying a ferry with 300 people burning by greece
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: Feb 12th, 2011, 1:56 pm
Re: here we go again
zookeeper wrote:I am not an aviation expert by any means but wonder why a plane would not be reported missing for a half an hour?
International standards ...
http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publicat ... c1003.html
... its not uncommon for an aircraft to disappear briefly off a radar or to loose communications briefly (wrong frequency as an example) so there has to be a window put in place to cover all possibilities of error before a massive search effort is launched. Even if, in this instance, the flight was reported missing within 5 minutes, nothing would be different ... the information we have to organize a search would be the same.
Nobody wants to hear your opinion. They just want to hear their own opinion coming out of your mouth.
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: here we go again
FAA rules are american and do not apply world wide and most definitely not in Canada
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: here we go again
Indonesia will have there own rules as does Singapore but here in Canada this is a good start to what we require for aircraft in our airspace
https://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/regserv/cars/part6-standards-625-2451.htm
lots of links to other parts of the Canadian rules as well
https://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/civilaviation/regserv/cars/part6-standards-625-2451.htm
lots of links to other parts of the Canadian rules as well
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 12102
- Joined: Mar 25th, 2012, 5:05 pm
Re: here we go again
Briefly yes, but one would think the bar would have been raised to set the alarm off earlier given past experience.
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: here we go again
Here ya go a link for Indonesia
http://hubud.dephub.go.id/files/dsku/CASR%20PART%2091%20Amdt.%202.pdf
http://hubud.dephub.go.id/files/dsku/CASR%20PART%2091%20Amdt.%202.pdf
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar
- JLives
- Buddha of the Board
- Posts: 23039
- Joined: Nov 27th, 2004, 10:53 am
Re: here we go again
Merry Christmas CNN, you get to bust out your plane props again!
"Every dollar you spend is a vote for what you believe in."
"My country is the world, and my religion is to do good."
"My country is the world, and my religion is to do good."
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: Feb 12th, 2011, 1:56 pm
Re: here we go again
omisimaw wrote:FAA rules are american and do not apply world wide and most definitely not in Canada
Many of the rules followed by the FAA, JAA, NavCanada are the same as elsewhere - there are international standards followed by various agencies.
Nobody wants to hear your opinion. They just want to hear their own opinion coming out of your mouth.
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: here we go again
omisimaw wrote:FAA rules are american and do not apply world wide and most definitely not in Canada
Dizzy1 wrote:Many of the rules followed by the FAA, JAA, NavCanada are the same as elsewhere - there are international standards followed by various agencies.
Or is it simply the other way around and the FAA mimic others LOL......
The fact of the matter is that quoting FAA rules is not the standard for the world, never has been and never will be and it is not NavCanada either, but that just proves you do not even look at the links provided....
Carry on.... it is always interesting seeing all the speculation on air ops from those who think they have it all in the bag, so to speak...
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar
-
- Guru
- Posts: 5684
- Joined: Oct 15th, 2007, 2:36 pm
Re: here we go again
omisimaw wrote:Or is it simply the other way around and the FAA mimic others LOL......
The fact of the matter is that quoting FAA rules is not the standard for the world, never has been and never will be and it is not NavCanada either, but that just proves you do not even look at the links provided....
Carry on.... it is always interesting seeing all the speculation on air ops from those who think they have it all in the bag, so to speak...
So completely ignoring whether or not the FAA is an international standard or not because it's irrelevant, is the 30 minute communications rule international standard or not?
Come quickly Jesus, we're barely holding on.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 10778
- Joined: Feb 12th, 2011, 1:56 pm
Re: here we go again
omisimaw wrote:
Carry on.... it is always interesting seeing all the speculation on air ops from those who think they have it all in the bag, so to speak...
Bye bye then :)
Nobody wants to hear your opinion. They just want to hear their own opinion coming out of your mouth.
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: here we go again
The Airbus A320 is equipped with a ditching switch, Diehl said, that essentially turns the plane's fuselage into a boat.
"If they got the aircraft down on the water safely," he said, "it should be floating."
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: here we go again
omisimaw wrote:Or is it simply the other way around and the FAA mimic others LOL......
The fact of the matter is that quoting FAA rules is not the standard for the world, never has been and never will be and it is not NavCanada either, but that just proves you do not even look at the links provided....
Carry on.... it is always interesting seeing all the speculation on air ops from those who think they have it all in the bag, so to speak...
FreeRights wrote:So completely ignoring whether or not the FAA is an international standard or not because it's irrelevant, is the 30 minute communications rule international standard or not?
You might want to check out this site for information
http://www.iata.org/about/Pages/index.aspx
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar