Page 385 of 1152

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 3rd, 2018, 2:40 pm
by christopher
"Banana Republicans" running the show.

After the last year I believe that the US does in fact need a house cleaning the corruption from both parties is to much for any sane person to put any trust in either party. How that's going to happen I DO NOT KNOW and I think this country is not far behind.

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 3rd, 2018, 8:32 pm
by Catsumi
We are powerless to change the USA problems. We might examine our own problem governments more closely. There's plenty of horse manure to root through.

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 4th, 2018, 11:59 pm
by jamapple
Catsumi wrote:We are powerless to change the USA problems. We might examine our own problem governments more closely. There's plenty of horse manure to root through.



Then, by all means, start a thread about it. Not one person on here really has a "stake" in the 3 ring circus the world now calls the United States of America. This is a forum for discussion, not making American policy. :topic:

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 5th, 2018, 3:28 pm
by Poindexter
On a lighter note.
[icon_lol2.gif]

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 6th, 2018, 5:19 pm
by christopher

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 7th, 2018, 5:27 am
by Poindexter
christopher wrote:https://www.rt.com/usa/418039-democrats-russians-did-it/
What the Russians are saying


Actually, to be accurate, it's what the Russians would like you to think.

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 7th, 2018, 9:00 am
by christopher
Poindexter wrote:
christopher wrote:https://www.rt.com/usa/418039-democrats-russians-did-it/
What the Russians are saying


Actually, to be accurate, it's what the Russians would like you to think.


They have be thinking that you cannot believe anything you read.

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 7th, 2018, 1:44 pm
by Poindexter
christopher wrote: They have be thinking that you cannot believe anything you read.


The source does matter and RT is a state of the art, state run channel. The Russians, who are pros at this, know that credibility does matter when it comes to influencing a narrative. They provide enough honest journalism to be taken seriously but readers should never forget that RT's main purpose is to promote Russian interests.

The fact you don't t know what to trust anymore has been a goal of Trump's administration since the onset. It has allowed him to isolate his followers to keep them misinformed and easy to manipulate.

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 7th, 2018, 3:46 pm
by christopher
Poindexter wrote:
christopher wrote: They have be thinking that you cannot believe anything you read.


The source does matter and RT is a state of the art, state run channel. The Russians, who are pros at this, know that credibility does matter when it comes to influencing a narrative. They provide enough honest journalism to be taken seriously but readers should never forget that RT's main purpose is to promote Russian interests.

The fact you don't t know what to trust anymore has been a goal of Trump's administration since the onset. It has allowed him to isolate his followers to keep them misinformed and easy to manipulate.



Are you saying that before Trump the main media was not fake. If the election of Trump has done one thing it's shown us that CNN and others that mocked Fox where in fact no better. I think media may never recover the trust of the public.

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 7th, 2018, 4:45 pm
by Poindexter
CNN and others that mocked Fox where in fact no better


This simply isn't true and I think what we're seeing is that the media was challenged and most other networks and news organizations have upped thier game, Fox on the other hand went in the other direction.

I think the reason you don't know what to believe is that maybe you're confusing bias with misinformation and lies. CNN may be somewhat biased but they always have a conservative on thier panels to provide a balanced view. They're also far more careful regarding thier sources and facts before they remove the alleged disclaimer.

Fox news on the other hand is not only biased, but they rarely if ever provide the Democrat's view and therefore lack balance. They are also known to further conspiracy theories with no regard for the source or the truth. Not sure if you've caught any of Hannity lately but there is no one that compares on CNN.

To say they are the same only means you need to work on your ability to filter out bias without filtering out the facts.

:topic:
Sorry ferri, gone off a bit here.

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 7th, 2018, 9:51 pm
by Poindexter
Yikes! :200:


Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 8th, 2018, 12:44 pm
by christopher
Poindexter wrote:
CNN and others that mocked Fox where in fact no better


This simply isn't true and I think what we're seeing is that the media was challenged and most other networks and news organizations have upped thier game, Fox on the other hand went in the other direction.

I think the reason you don't know what to believe is that maybe you're confusing bias with misinformation and lies. CNN may be somewhat biased but they always have a conservative on thier panels to provide a balanced view. They're also far more careful regarding thier sources and facts before they remove the alleged disclaimer.

Fox news on the other hand is not only biased, but they rarely if ever provide the Democrat's view and therefore lack balance. They are also known to further conspiracy theories with no regard for the source or the truth. Not sure if you've caught any of Hannity lately but there is no one that compares on CNN.

To say they are the same only means you need to work on your ability to filter out bias without filtering out the facts.

SO you are saying that the 24 7 anti Trump news on CNN is not one sided. You cannot see that the guest is talked over I was hoping for honesty from you guys I do research the stories enough to see that none not CNN,MSNBC, FOX , RT, CBC, BBC can be trusted. I want a news outlet that reports the news without bias.

:topic:
Sorry ferri, gone off a bit here.

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 8th, 2018, 3:24 pm
by Necro
Poindexter wrote:The source does matter and RT is a state of the art, state run channel. The Russians, who are pros at this, know that credibility does matter when it comes to influencing a narrative. They provide enough honest journalism to be taken seriously but readers should never forget that RT's main purpose is to promote Russian interests.


:spitcoffee:

I would like you to point out a single fact Lee Camp (https://twitter.com/LeeCamp) has raised while hosting Redacted Tonight (https://twitter.com/RedactedTonight) (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyvaZ2 ... Xz43gz7CbQ) that has been proved wrong.

Just one point.

CNN and FOX represent 2 sides of the same coin, the fact you haven't been able to reason this out is astounding.

:200:

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 9th, 2018, 5:50 am
by Poindexter
You must be right, I'm unable to reason, maybe I should also get my news from twitter so I can be smart like you. :up:

:topic:

Re: Trump Administration: First Hundred Days and Beyond.

Posted: Feb 9th, 2018, 6:30 am
by Necro
Anyone who relies solely upon MSM to give them an unbiased truth regarding anything political should be required to wear a helmet when venturing outdoors.