Department of National Defense - why a name change is needed

[Thinktank]

In 1983, Pierre Trudeau was our prime minister, and Canada agreed to test cruise
missiles for the Americans over Alberta. We were told back then it was necessary to test cruise
missiles because Russia was a threat. So it was for defensive purposes we were helping out
the Americans. With cruise missile testing.

But now I see 100% of our "defense" spending, and 100% of our partners "defense' spending ( the Americans)
is used to blow the hell out of Muslim countries (and a few Christians too) .

None of that $6 trillion the west spent blowing the hell
out of Iraq was for defense. It was all to slaughter Muslims, so our huge multinational corporations can get
more and more control of the best stuff in the world.

and like Albright said when asked if killing 500,000 children was worth it, she said "it was worth it."

So why don't we change the name from "Department of National Defense" to "Bueau of Blowing *bleep* up"

"Bueau of Blowing *bleep* up"

Way to go Trump. I thought you were going to get along with other countries. And way to go Justin.




..

[FreeRights]

In 1983, Pierre Trudeau was our prime minister, and Canada agreed to test cruise
missiles for the Americans over Alberta. We were told back then it was necessary to test cruise
missiles because Russia was a threat. So it was for defensive purposes we were helping out
the Americans. With cruise missile testing.

But now I see 100% of our "defense" spending, and 100% of our partners "defense' spending ( the Americans)
is used to blow the hell out of Muslim countries (and a few Christians too) .

None of that $6 trillion the west spent blowing the hell
out of Iraq was for defense. It was all to slaughter Muslims, so our huge multinational corporations can get
more and more control of the best stuff in the world.

and like Albright said when asked if killing 500,000 children was worth it, she said "it was worth it."

So why don't we change the name from "Department of National Defense" to "Bueau of Blowing *bleep* up"

"Bueau of Blowing *bleep* up"

Way to go Trump. I thought you were going to get along with other countries. And way to go Justin.




..

We didn't spend $6 trillion dollars. Is this thread about Canada or the US?

The Canadian Forces, had you done research, is currently involved in conflicts all over the world. While I actually agree to some point with you that the invasion of Iraq was a pointless war, a lot of the work being done in and around that area now is cleaning that up.

[Thinktank]

a lot of the work being done in and around that area now is cleaning that up.

Actually, Americans are not very clean people, and Canada is their partner now that Justin just agreed
with Trumpty Dumpty spending $60 million to fire cruise missiles into Syria.


We won't shell out any money to clean up our mess in Laos.
One kid a day over there gets their legs blown off, and messy USA (our partner) only spends about $1 million
a year to clean stuff up in Laos.

We should learn to be more clean. I wonder if USA (our partner) can ever clean the depleted uranium they
left as a gift for Iraqi children. Our western warmonger countries are definitely not very clean
when it comes to cleaning things up.


^ That's what it's all about. Trump and Justin both agree on using $60 million worth of cruise missiles.


http://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-i ... 2017-04-07

[FreeRights]

Ah yes, a thinly veiled anti-US thread.

[Thinktank]

For money, anyone will be partners with a crook. We're partners with the Americans now, and they're slaughtering
millions of people in wars - for money.

Our "Department of Defense" here in Canada dropped 240 bombs on Libya,
the African country with the highest standard of living. Was it for defensive purposes?

Nope. We did it because we're partners with USA now. For money.