A Replacement of Population is Taking Place in Europe

[averagejoe]

This is a U.N. sanctioned policy.....

A Replacement of Population is Taking Place in Europe



People-smugglers bring the migrants to the NGOs' ships, which then reach Italian seaports. Another legal enquiry has been opened about the mafia's economic interests in managing the migrants after their arrival.

One cannot compare the migrants to the Jews fleeing Nazism. Pope Francis, for example, recently compared the migrants' centers to Nazi "concentration camps". Where are the gas chambers, medical "experiments," crematoria, slave labor, forced marches and firing squads? These comparisons are spread by the media for a precise reason: shutting down the debate.

By 2065, it is expected that 14.4 million migrants will arrive. Added to the more than five million immigrants currently in Italy, 37% of the population is expected to be foreigners: more than one out of every three inhabitants.

First, it was the Hungarian route. Then it was the Balkan route. Now Italy is the epicenter of this demographic earthquake, and it has become Europe's soft underbelly as hundreds of thousands of migrants arrive.

With nearly 10,000 arrivals in one recent three-day period, the number of migrants in 2017 exceeded 60,000 -- 48% more than the same period last year, when they were 40,000. Over Easter weekend a record 8,000 migrants were rescued in the Mediterranean and brought to Italy. And that is just the tip of the iceberg: during the summer, the number of arrivals from Libya will only increase.

A replacement of population is under way in Italy. But if you open the mainstream newspapers, you barely find these figures. No television station has dedicated any time to what is happening. No criticism is allowed. The invasion is considered a done deal.

In 2016, 176,554 migrants landed in Italy -- an eight-fold increase since 2014. In 2015, there were 103,792. In 2014, there were 66,066. In 2013, there were just 22,118. In the last four years, 427,000 migrants reached Italy. In only the first five months of this year, 2017, Italy received 10% of the total number of migrants of the last four years.

There are days when the Italian navy and coast guard rescue 1,700 migrants in 24 hours. The country is exhausted. There are Italian villages where one-tenth of the population is already made up of new migrants. We are talking about small towns of 220 residents and 40 migrants.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1052 ... eplacement

[averagejoe]

Nearly seven million migrants are ‘waiting to cross into Europe’: Leaked report warns of new crisis but Brussels insists the situation is under control

Millions of asylum seekers are waiting to cross into Europe, leaked report says
Confidential report says there 2.5million waiting in war-torn North Africa
Surge has led to 1,200 deaths so far this year as gangs use ruthless tactics



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4i1mcKnin

[averagejoe]

Here for your viewing...the U.N. Replacement Population Policy....

So when was this written? 2001, 16 years ago....and now it's happening.

Korea and Japan aren't experiencing massive, only European based countries are...

United Nations projections indicate that over the next 50 years, the populations of virtually all countries of Europe as well as Japan will face population decline and population ageing. The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require comprehensive reassessments of many established policies and programmes, including those relating to international migration.

Focusing on these two striking and critical population trends, the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.

http://www.un.org/esa/population/public ... ration.htm

[kgcayenne]

We're next?
https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-s ... htm#199518
Our birth rate is declining here, because it's incredibly difficult to raise children. Their overall health decline is evidence of that. So many people say things like "If you can't afford it, don't HAVE kids," and many don't.

[The Green Barbarian]

[What_the]

Basically like the unprecedented migration from rural areas to cities 150 years ago.

So what's your point? That poor people should stay poor? Or you just don't want foreigners around your white countries.

[averagejoe]

Basically like the unprecedented migration from rural areas to cities 150 years ago.

So what's your point? That poor people should stay poor? Or you just don't want foreigners around your white countries.

This mass migration into host European countries has been planned by the U.N. years ago without the consideration or input of the peoples countries being invaded....

Like being sneaky...

[averagejoe]

That poor people should stay poor?

Are talking about wealth re-distribution?

[Merry]

It is true that many of those entering Europe via Libya and Italy are economic migrants rather than refugees. And this fact needs to be acknowledged.

It is also true that if nothing is done to help these people assimilate into their new environment, then a clash of cultures is inevitable.

If such a clash is to be prevented then two things need to be done:

1. Find ways to help some of these folks stay in their countries of origin (by helping their Governments improve their economic realities)

2. For those migrants who still travel to the west, work with them to help them better assimilate into their new countries.

When it comes to the second part of my suggestion, it has been my experience that host countries often expend more energy on getting current citizens to accommodate the new ones, than teaching the new ones how best to "fit in". And I think that has been a mistake, because all it does is breed resentment on the part of those currently resident in the host country.

Nobody is suggesting that new immigrants abandon all of their native culture BUT, when it comes to social norms that are in direct conflict with the norms of the host country, then they should be willing to give up those particular beliefs and practices (or return to their country of origin). Which may sound harsh, but the alternative is a never ending conflict between the two cultures; conflict that often erupts into violence.

[What_the]

Basically like the unprecedented migration from rural areas to cities 150 years ago.

So what's your point? That poor people should stay poor? Or you just don't want foreigners around your white countries.

This mass migration into host European countries has been planned by the U.N. years ago without the consideration or input of the peoples countries being invaded....

Like being sneaky...

There is truth to needing immigrants, Canadas economy needs them as well. But I admit this is a subject im not well versed. Your post struck me as xenophobic is all. Perhaps I more see the world as one with provincial borders since all the world's economies are so intrinsically intertwined that without each other none of us would have the living standards we do.

Wealth re distribution? Nothing so communistically dramatic. It only means that people seek economic prosperity either through want or need much like European immigration to Canada,US and Australia after WWII. European economies in ruins after continentally devastating war the people needed to find greener pastures. Coincidentally the reason I'm a white boy born in Canada.

[Merry]

There is nothing wrong with people wanting to improve their lot in life. We all do it.

And there is nothing wrong with Governments bringing in immigrants to replace those who are aging out of the workforce. It's an economic necessity.

Equally, people should not have to totally abandon the culture of their birth just because they're changing their geographic location. Although, in order to avoid tension between people from different cultures, everyone (both new migrants and original inhabitants) must be willing to compromise a little.

However, when compromise is impossible, because the norms of the two cultures are incompatible, then those who are the latest arrivals should either adapt to their new environment, or return to their country of origin. Because, if they don't, racial tension between people who adhere to the differing cultural norms is inevitable.

Cultural norms such as the circumcision of female children, or the physical beating of one's wife, are completely incompatible with the Western way of life, and there can be no compromise on issues such as that.

[GordonH]

I have absolutely no problem with immigration, just with 1 major hurdle each & every immigrant must go through extensive vetting.
Anyone caught bypassing the vetting is given the boot, with 5 year ban on trying again though proper channels.

[What_the]

I have absolutely no problem with immigration, just with 1 major hurdle each & every immigrant must go through extensive vetting.
Anyone caught bypassing the vetting is given the boot, with 5 year ban on trying again though proper channels.

No disrespect as you're protecting your nation. But a thought to consider- when statistically 2 of your 5 children died before the age of 5 (can't cite exact numbers, but that's how it basically is in the third world. look up the stats for deaths before 5 years old world wide) would you truly give a rat's *bleep* about any vetting process? Or would you do whatever you could to make their lives better?

[Merry]

No disrespect as you're protecting your nation. But a thought to consider- when statistically 2 of your 5 children died before the age of 5 (can't cite exact numbers, but that's how it basically is in the third world. look up the stats for deaths before 5 years old world wide) would you truly give a rat's *bleep* about any vetting process? Or would you do whatever you could to make their lives better?

I think most people would do whatever they could "What_the", but that's not the point. Nobody is criticizing those who will go to any lengths necessary to save themselves, and/or their families. Or even criticizing those who just want to improve their lot in life. Because that is human nature. The point is that it is up to our Government to make sure that those who come here will be able to peacefully adapt to their new way of life, including accepting some social norms that may be totally alien to their own.

I repeat, that nobody is expecting anyone to completely abandon all aspects of their originating culture. But any particular aspects that are in direct conflict with accepted Western values need to be explored a little, prior to allowing folks who hold such views into the country. Because if such people feel they are unable to change their views and adapt to (or at least accept as valid) the Western way of life, maybe they'd be better (for themselves as much as for the rest of us) to consider emigrating to a different country instead. One where the cultural norms would not be as much in conflict with their own world view.

[JLives]

We're citizens of Earth before our respective countries. We have always migrated around the planet and always will. Borders are imaginary and quickly becoming obsolete. Patriotism is racism with a flag. Let the people go where they want.