Democrate woman has plan end harrasment

[maryjane48]

Michigan Candidate Has An Idea How To End Harassment: Vote For Someone Without A Penis


Democrat Dana Nessel says she won't show her penis in a professional setting -- because she doesn't have one.


But Dana Nessel, a Democrat running to be Michigan’s attorney general, has a simpler idea: Elect more women. 


http://huffp.st/EKngB7g

[Sparki55]

Michigan Candidate Has An Idea How To End Harassment: Vote For Someone Without A Penis


Democrat Dana Nessel says she won't show her penis in a professional setting -- because she doesn't have one.


But Dana Nessel, a Democrat running to be Michigan’s attorney general, has a simpler idea: Elect more women. 


http://huffp.st/EKngB7g

She has a great argument. Remove all the men from power and there won't be sexual harassment, towards women. Are we so niave to think women in power won't abuse their position? Why the argument always deteriorates to an us vs them mentality is beyond me.

Something funny to bring to light. When Donald Trump accused Hilary of playing the women car, he was called sexist. Now a candidate can state this herself and isn't going to be label as a sexist comment?
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/news/a44629/donald-trump-insults-women/

Frankly, if Hillary Clinton were a man, I don’t think she’d get 5 percent of the vote," Trump said in April. "The only thing she’s got going is the women’s card." Here’s a reminder that Hillary Clinton is a former secretary of state, U.S. senator, and first lady, making her one of the most qualified presidential candidates in U.S. history. And considering America has experienced 227 years of male presidents and zero years of female presidents, one might reconsider how much Trump is benefitting from the "man card." The absurd comment was a boon to the Clinton campaign, which drafted up actual "woman cards" for Clinton supporters.

Maybe a society led by women would be great? Maybe then men can learn how it feels to be harassed.

People in power will abuse it no matter if its a man or woman. We're all equal so stop the fighting.

[The Green Barbarian]

But Dana Nessel, a Democrat running to be Michigan’s attorney general, has a simpler idea: Elect more women. 

or an even simpler idea - vote for the best person for the job, instead of voting based on genitalia. How about that???

[Rider59]

or an even simpler idea - vote for the best person for the job, instead of voting based on genitalia. How about that???

OK, I'll say it. One big reason that the world is becoming such a soft, PC correct, SJW, everyone's a victim haven is because the increasing maternal influence in political arenas.

But I would fight for their right to do so.

[the truth]

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/24/sexual- ... ntary.html

[Poindexter]

[
OK, I'll say it. One big reason that the world is becoming such a soft, PC correct, SJW, everyone's a victim haven is because the increasing maternal influence in political arenas.:

Seems to me you three are the only ones playing the victim card here. If voters believe it's time women were more equally represented in government then that's their prerogative.

[The Green Barbarian]

Seems to me you three are the only ones playing the victim card here. If voters believe it's time women were more equally represented in government then that's their prerogative.

So if that woman had a nail through her head that impaired her cognitive abilities to the point of not being able to drive or remember more than 1 hour's worth of discussion, you are saying that everyone should just vote for her anyway? Because that's what it seems like Leftists want. No matter what, just vote based on genitalia. That just seems so stupid, and catastrophic. Our government should be run by the best and the brightest. If that means 100% of the people running government are women, so be it, as long as they are the best!

[Poindexter]

^^

That's pretty rich for someone that defends Trump who has zero qualifications and acts as though he has more than a few nails in his head.

[Rider59]

*removed*

[The Green Barbarian]

^^

That's pretty rich for someone that defends Trump who has zero qualifications and acts as though he has more than a few nails in his head.

As expected, complete deflection. At some point it would be nice if one of the proponents of genitalia-based voting could make a case stronger than our Airhead PM, and just spout "because it's 2015". That's not good enough. Get some courage. Actually state why you would vote for a woman just because of her genitals, even if she wasn't the best candidate running. Go for it. Grow a backbone.

[Poindexter]

^^
There you go throwing another hissy fit. Just to change things up, why don't you try replying sometimes without rage. Go for it!

Look, neither Democrat Dana Nessel nor I said anyone should vote for someone unqualified, that's a Republican move. But I do think it's revealing that you immediately assume that the only thing a female candidate brings to the table is her genitalia.