Hillary Clinton supports sexual harassment

[the truth]

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/26/politics ... index.html no big suprise here, she couverd for her husbad, now this,

[Ka-El]

But, but, its CNN? Isn't that "fake news" according to all you Trump apologists
- or is it only fake when the news is contrary to your preconceived notions?

[the truth]

ya and according to you leftwingers cnn would never lie, so there you have it

[Jlabute]

Yeah, it is CNN, but they seem to be echoing what everyone else is echoing. Burns Strider is a faith consultant for democrats, accused by a 30yo subordinate of having her shoulders rubbed, forehead kissed, suggestive emails, etc. Could be the 30,000 emails that were deleted, lol. I am sure it affected the young woman more than Burns. Hillary, THE woman’s advocate, seeing Burns services as more important, maybe decided to ditch the girl.

“A senior adviser to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign who was accused of repeatedly sexually harassing a young subordinate was kept on the campaign at Mrs. Clinton’s request, according to four people familiar with what took place.

Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager at the time recommended that she fire the adviser, Burns Strider. But Mrs. Clinton did not. Instead, Mr. Strider was docked several weeks of pay and ordered to undergo counseling, and the young woman was moved to a new job.”

[Ka-El]

Yeah, it is CNN, but they seem to be echoing what everyone else is echoing. Burns Strider is a faith consultant for democrats, accused by a 30yo subordinate of having her shoulders rubbed, forehead kissed, suggestive emails, etc. Could be the 30,000 emails that were deleted, lol. I am sure it affected the young woman more than Burns. Hillary, THE woman’s advocate, seeing Burns services as more important, maybe decided to ditch the girl.

No way I'm going to defend Hillary's hypocrisy. I don't doubt much of what is reported there.
I'm simply amused by the hypocrisy of those who love to throw the term around.

[ferri]

[Jlabute]

I found this link a little interesting.
First, it contains Hillary’s b*tches supporting b*tches video, and another comment that Harvey Weinstein donated $10,000 to Bill Clinton’s legal Defense. Small world ain’t it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5318889/Hillary-responds-accusations-wouldnt-fire-Strider.html

I’m with you on the Clinton’s, there is really enough water under the bridge to creep someone out.

[the truth]

just shows she is worst than trump on every level and that is not an easy thing to do

[Omnitheo]

How so? “Hillary Clinton supports sexual harassment” even if true I don’t see how that’s worse than Trump himself actually commuting sexual harassment and assault.

[the truth]

*removed*

[christopher]

:135: But, but, its CNN? Isn't that "fake news" according to all you Trump apologists
- or is it only fake when the news is contrary to your preconceived notions?

If Trump has done one thing it is that the fake news thing is bigger than any of us knew.

[the truth]

How so? “Hillary Clinton supports sexual harassment” even if true I don’t see how that’s worse than Trump himself actually commuting sexual harassment and assault.

well your are a big fan of innocent until proven guilty, or does it only matter when you say so

[Ka-El]

:135: But, but, its CNN? Isn't that "fake news" according to all you Trump apologists
- or is it only fake when the news is contrary to your preconceived notions?

If Trump has done one thing it is that the fake news thing is bigger than any of us knew.

Indeed, but what many people are not aware of is that the investigation into the proliferation of fake news revealed its main source. Yes, some major news organizations were duped by this agenda and reported inaccurate news stories, but the manipulation of American perception was already being created via social media and blogging sites.

Facebook (FB) admitted this month that it recommended content produced by Russian operatives to some users, the latest acknowledgment that it underestimated how extensively foreign actors manipulated its platform around the time of the 2016 presidential election.

https://nz.finance.yahoo.com/news/more- ... 42071.html

These Two Russian 'Fake News' Outfits Get Billions Of Hits On Facebook

Facebook CEO and Forbes billionaire Mark Zuckerberg released a sober video Thursday regarding "fake news," promising to hand over 3,000 Russian ads to congress. The goal: to see if those ads convinced hapless Americans to pull the lever for Trump instead of Hillary. Facebook has already handed over copies of the ads and information about their creators to Special Counsel Robert Mueller, still knee-deep in his Russia investigation. Zuck said he plans to "fight election interference."

Facebook did not respond to immediate comment about what those ads were.

For sure, the Russians are all over Facebook.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/ ... 3a9ae3268c

Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say

The flood of “fake news” this election season got support from a sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign that created and spread misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Democrat Hillary Clinton, helping Republican Donald Trump and undermining faith in American democracy, say independent researchers who tracked the operation.

Russia’s increasingly sophisticated propaganda machinery — including thousands of botnets, teams of paid human “trolls,” and networks of websites and social-media accounts — echoed and amplified right-wing sites across the Internet as they portrayed Clinton as a criminal hiding potentially fatal health problems and preparing to hand control of the nation to a shadowy cabal of global financiers. The effort also sought to heighten the appearance of international tensions and promote fear of looming hostilities with nuclear-armed Russia.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... 6c0ce533bc

Reports: Russian operation boosted 'fake news' phenomenon

The "fake news" phenomenon that circulated thousands of phony stories during the election was aided by a sophisticated Russian propaganda effort, according to the Washington Post.

Independent researchers who tracked the bold operation say the goal was to punish Democrat Hillary Clinton, help Republican Donald Trump and undermine faith in American democracy, the newspaper reports.

Two teams of independent researchers found that the Russians exploited American-made technology platforms to attack U.S. democracy at a particularly vulnerable moment in the rancorous campaigns. Among the most-circulated stories were items on Clinton's health and fears about vote rigging.

“They want to essentially erode faith in the U.S. government or U.S. government interests,” said Clint Watts, a fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute who co-authored a report on Russian propaganda, the Post reports. “This was their standard mode during the Cold War. The problem is that this was hard to do before social media.”

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/201 ... /94424206/

Yes, fake news is a real issue – one that is only really addressed by considering everything as suspect until evaluated critically (comparing to other sources, for example). There is a lot of information from investigation into this subject for those who are interested in knowing more. I would be less concerned with considering news being reported by CNN or the Washington Post, than people being swayed by some of the nonsense that gets spewed from the likes of Breibart, Milo or the Rebel.

[ferri]

Hillary Clinton supports sexual harassment

[common_sense_guy]

To the person listed as" the truth" who started this thread., you give a link to an article that talks about Hillary keeping on on an "alleged "sexual harasser. So she's guilty because she kept on an alleged "harasser? So you say she condones sexual harassment because she kept on an alleged harasser that obviously has not been proven in court or else it wouldn't just be alleged. You should not have started the threat even as it has no basis for what point you were trying to make