Should White Males be Banned From Voting?

[averagejoe]

Stop white males from voting and then eliminate them...case closed.

Hate crime is suspected after a gunman kills 3 white men in downtown Fresno

If in fact he’s lashing out at white people — white males in this case



http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-m ... story.html

[Silverstarqueen]

In the U.S. in 2013 there were 1740 (approx)white males killed, 207o black males killed.
At that rate the blacks would be extinct long before the whites and it would take several/many thousands of years to drive the white males to extinction. A far more likely scenario, and probably quicker would be for the blacks and browns to intermarry with the whites, which is what is alreay happening. Let them try to figure out who to take the vote away when they can't tell one from another without a dna test.

[averagejoe]

In the U.S. in 2013 there were 1740 white males killed, 2073 black males killed.
At that rate the blacks would be extinct long before the whites and it would take several/many thousands of years to drive the white males to extinction. A far more likely scenario, and probably quicker would be for the blacks and browns to intermarry with the whites, which is what is alreay happening. Let them try to figure out who to take the vote away when they can't tell one from another without a dna test.

You didn't take into consideration the birth rate....

[Silverstarqueen]

If blacks and whites intermarry, the resulting births will be brown, and will eliminate white males. We can estimate that more mixed children would be born in a given year, than waiting for criminals and thugs to kill off the white guys faster than the brown/black guys. This(iintermarriage) will still be faster than killing off a few thousand each year of the majority (white) population.And would probably be less disruptive to the social fabric.

[Glacier]

If blacks and whites intermarry, the resulting births will be brown, and will eliminate white males.

What an idiotic statement. You clearly know nothing about genetics. The genetics that produces white pigmentation still exists when you have intermarriages. Recessive genes are still passed on, and when both sets of parents have the recessive gene, and the both pass them on, the child will take on the recessive characteristic.

You're essentially saying that if blue eyed people intermarried with green and brown eyed people, blue eyes would disappear. Guess what, my son has blue eyes even though my wife and I don't. Why? Because her and I both have the recessive gene, and we both passed it on to our son. The same principle apples skin color.

[Silverstarqueen]

I didn't say anything about eye color. And it doesn't mean that whites would "disappear" in one or two generations, but over time, skin tones would become more consistently brown , and it would happen a lot faster than by waiting for thugs and criminals to gradually whack white guys out of existance. Look at the mediterranean skin tones, not all are white as a sheet, not all are tanned, brown, they are a mixture of darker and lighter skin tones. Some asians are as dark skinned as some blacks.There are already many many americans who are a lighter brown than the black skin tone that came from their African ancestors. Obviously because they were inter mixed with whites. If these people continue to mix with whites, and others of mixed race, the process continues. It is also going on around the world. The mixing of races was taboo in most western societies until recently. Goodness you never saw a black american even kiss a white person on TV, interracial marriages were outlawed in many places. Now it's no big deal. So the mixing will happen. And yes a few not so dark eyes will turn up in the mixture, does that make a person of mixed races, suddenly "white" if they have lighter colored eyes? Are they not white if they have brown eyes? The more mixed up the races become, the harder it will be to discriminate on the basis of color.

Example (obviously there are unlimited variations on skin color possible once you start mixing people up.
http://indignantconservativemom.blogspo ... mixed.html

Meghan Markel's (who will possibly we prince Harry)mother is African American. Is she white or brown?
Will their children , if they marry, be white or not?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/750 ... -facts-age

[Glacier]

I didn't say anything about eye color. And it doesn't mean that whites would "disappear" in one or two generations, but over time, skin tones would become more consistently brown

That's simply not true. There might be more brown people from interracial marriages, but the very dark and the very light will never disappear (so long as they don't stop breeding).

[Queen K]

Captain Awesome made a post once on this very topic. He said that the newer generational intermarriages are going to result in the general populations being shades of cafe au laits and in time, no one will think much of it.

I see it happening now. For sure.

[the truth]

Stop white males from voting and then eliminate them...case closed.

Hate crime is suspected after a gunman kills 3 white men in downtown Fresno

If in fact he’s lashing out at white people — white males in this case



http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-m ... story.html

if it was a white guy that did this, it would be on cnn 24/7 for a week and black lives matter would be burning sh down

[ferri]

[Silverstarqueen]

Sure, there are white people in India, only thing is, you can't distinguish the whites from the dark brown because it's a blending, a continuum. Our society is just beginning to integrate, so it looks like you can keep whites and darks nicely compartmentalized. This will not be so easy in future generations. I have a relative who is half native canadian. You can't tell him from other regular kids, and this is true for many others. So these labels will get harder and harder to maintain. The terms, black , white etc people will just shake their heads like it's so stupid.
https://www.google.ca/search?q=indian+c ... sXmKuC-XQM:

[Atomoa]

This story was actually a troll piece, written by a man to prove that the Huffington Post and society at large is biased against men. The original author's name was Shelly but that person doesn't exist. Turns out that this activist wanted to prove that you can literally say "white men should have the vote taken away from them!" under the banner of feminism and nobody would question it. Hell - a major newspaper would even publish it!

Turns out he was right. It's like going back to 1945 Alabama and saying in a crowded room that blacks are criminals and should not be allowed to vote and everyone agreeing with it. Our resident feminist here on Castanet also posted this story in the feminism thread and "mused" about the so called benefits of taking the vote away from white men. I even thought it was written by a feminist because that type of language and sentiment is very common in those circles.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... ing-rights

[liisgo]

Captain Awesome made a post once on this very topic. He said that the newer generational intermarriages are going to result in the general populations being shades of cafe au laits and in time, no one will think much of it.

I see it happening now. For sure.

But, then who will all the victims blame for everything.

[Silverstarqueen]

This story was actually a troll piece, written by a man to prove that the Huffington Post and society at large is biased against men. The original author's name was Shelly but that person doesn't exist. Turns out that this activist wanted to prove that you can literally say "white men should have the vote taken away from them!" under the banner of feminism and nobody would question it. Hell - a major newspaper would even publish it!

Turns out he was right. It's like going back to 1945 Alabama and saying in a crowded room that blacks are criminals and should not be allowed to vote and everyone agreeing with it. Our resident feminist here on Castanet also posted this story in the feminism thread and "mused" about the so called benefits of taking the vote away from white men. I even thought it was written by a feminist because that type of language and sentiment is very common in those circles.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... ing-rights

No one would question it? I think it was questioned, as in, this could never happen, so it is not a serious piece.Or, not a piece to be taken seriously, or just kooky thinking.or, not mainstream feminist thinking even if a few don't seem to question it.
or, this must be satire.(Remember those who swore it could not be satire?)
So, once again, some male spouting nonsense, is blamed on feminists, when it wasn't even a woman, or a feminist at all.

[Glacier]

Captain Awesome made a post once on this very topic. He said that the newer generational intermarriages are going to result in the general populations being shades of cafe au laits and in time, no one will think much of it.

I see it happening now. For sure.

CA was quoting Russel Peters who is a comedian. He's making a funny statement to get laughs when he says the world will eventually be like him -- beige. While it's funny because it sounds plausible, it's not actually true.