Locals charged with child porn
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 11112
- Joined: Jul 30th, 2009, 12:10 am
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
A_Britishcolumbian wrote:
the only way you can say this and it be true is for you to have viewed the evidence, for you to have seen these things, or to trust another's opinion that has.
what did you see? what were you told?
if all you have been told is the same as the what the rest of us have been told, then you are either mistaken or lying.
If there was no evidence, there world be no charges. Right now there is 3 charges against Mr Preston
We Have Been Conditioned To See Only What They Want Us To See.
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
Bejvas wrote:Yes, we have the right to an opinion of what has already been in the media and released by the RCMP.
Show us where the media has called him a pedophile. Show us where the media has stated he is guilty. Show us where the media has stated he has harmed any child.
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar
- Bejvas
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: Dec 13th, 2009, 12:38 pm
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
by Bejvas » 6 minutes ago
THERE ARE PICTURES AND VIDEOS OF CHILD PORN, THERE ARE VICTIMS.
A_Britishcolumbian wrote:the only way you can say this and it be true is for you to have viewed the evidence, for you to have seen these things, or to trust another's opinion that has.
what did you see? what were you told?
if all you have been told is the same as the what the rest of us have been told, then you are either mistaken or lying.
I trust the RCMP, why don't you pick on somebody else but me, it is pretty obvious you just post here to pick on me specifically.
"Just because you're angry, it doesn't mean you have the right to be cruel."
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 11112
- Joined: Jul 30th, 2009, 12:10 am
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
*removed*
Last edited by ferri on May 22nd, 2014, 2:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: off topic/you need to start another thread.
Reason: off topic/you need to start another thread.
We Have Been Conditioned To See Only What They Want Us To See.
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
Bejvas wrote:
SINCE THERE ARE PICTURES AND VIDEOS OF CHILD PORN, THERE ARE VICTIMS. PERIOD.
Show us where there are pictures and videos of child porn.
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 11112
- Joined: Jul 30th, 2009, 12:10 am
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
omisimaw wrote:
Show us where the media has called him a pedophile. Show us where the media has stated he is guilty. Show us where the media has stated he has harmed any child.
Pedophile: An adult who is sexually attracted to children, and the charges says it all
Last edited by kompili on May 22nd, 2014, 2:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We Have Been Conditioned To See Only What They Want Us To See.
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
kompili wrote:
If there was no evidence, there world be no charges. Right now there is 3 charges against Mr Preston
3 charges do not = evidence of photos and videos
3 charges were laid after a search warrant was exercised and equipment was seized.
What if anything was found is unknown to you, to me and to everyone else on this thread.
No photos .... No videos.... No children
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
omisimaw wrote:
Show us where the media has called him a pedophile. Show us where the media has stated he is guilty. Show us where the media has stated he has harmed any child.
kompili wrote:Pedophile: An adult who is sexually attracted to children, and the charges says it all
Yes, you can google a definition.... yippee but show us where the media has stated this about this accused....
Do not put words in the mouth of the media....
Remember this is your opinion only and that can change from an opinion to libel and slander real quick.
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar
- Bejvas
- Lord of the Board
- Posts: 3067
- Joined: Dec 13th, 2009, 12:38 pm
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
omisimaw wrote:Show us where the media has called him a pedophile. Show us where the media has stated he is guilty. Show us where the media has stated he has harmed any child.
omisimaw wrote:Show us where there are pictures and videos of child porn.
Do you know what pedophilia is? If you read about what it is, that will clarify your question.
show us show us show us, who is us?
I am not the RCMP or the crown, if you want them to show you THEIR EVIDENCE FOR CHARGING HIM, you can ask them, maybe they will release it to you.
"Just because you're angry, it doesn't mean you have the right to be cruel."
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 21577
- Joined: Jan 14th, 2005, 2:30 pm
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
omisimaw wrote: Show us where there are pictures and videos of child porn.
Why? It's not for us to see. nor do I want to. the fact is the RCMP have something.
"A dog is the only thing on earth that loves you more than he loves himself." -- Josh Billings
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 11112
- Joined: Jul 30th, 2009, 12:10 am
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
omisimaw wrote:3 charges do not = evidence of photos and videos
3 charges were laid after a search warrant was exercised and equipment was seized.
What if anything was found is unknown to you, to me and to everyone else on this thread.
No photos .... No videos.... No children
If nothing was found then there would be no charges
We Have Been Conditioned To See Only What They Want Us To See.
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
Bejvas wrote:
I didn't know he was to appear in court today.
Yet you know he is guilty? Really
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
kompili wrote:
If nothing was found then there would be no charges
So you equate this to pictures and videos? and children?
This is the whole scope of what a person needs to have to be charged?
Do you know what it takes to get charged? I will ask again! Hopefully one of these times you will take a look at the law and see that this evidence can be a multitude of things and evidence can be thrown out and dropped....
So whatever it was that prompted the charge is not known. As is the strength of the evidence when put to the test in court.
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 11112
- Joined: Jul 30th, 2009, 12:10 am
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
omisimaw wrote:
Yes, you can google a definition.... yippee but show us where the media has stated this about this accused....
Do not put words in the mouth of the media....
Remember this is your opinion only and that can change from an opinion to libel and slander real quick.
This isn't all about the media, people have there own opinions on the matter, if the charges have been laid, the people will make up there own opinions
We Have Been Conditioned To See Only What They Want Us To See.
- omisimaw
- Guru
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2007, 4:08 pm
Re: Peachland Reporter Charged with Child Porn
omisimaw wrote: Show us where there are pictures and videos of child porn.
Triple 6 wrote:Why? It's not for us to see. nor do I want to. the fact is the RCMP have something.
Nor do I but continually claiming there are pictures and videos of children is simply at this time a figment of the imagination.
PLUS if there is some documentation then it can be that he is doing something within the law as a journalist. That also is unknown at this point.
To be offended is a choice we make; it is not a condition inflicted or imposed upon us by someone or something else. - David A. Bednar