Page 1 of 1
Better to have than have not
Posted: May 25th, 2017, 9:48 am
by Jflem1983
Re: Better to have than have not
Posted: Jun 8th, 2017, 11:56 am
by bob vernon
Let's loosen up the laws. Allow us to start carrying guns. And to have some of the heavier weapons in our houses. There's a neighbourhood do-gooder who campaigns every election (provincial AND Federal) for the NDP and always drops off pamphlets at our house. I'd like to threaten her a bit.
Re: Better to have than have not
Posted: Jun 8th, 2017, 12:07 pm
by neilsimon
Re: Better to have than have not
Posted: Jun 8th, 2017, 12:08 pm
by What_the
Seriously^^ that's a bit much.
Glad we have laws that keep guns out of looney hands.
Re: Better to have than have not
Posted: Jun 8th, 2017, 12:25 pm
by Jflem1983
What_the wrote:Seriously^^ that's a bit much.
Glad we have laws that keep guns out of looney hands.
If I'm ever king . All our gun laws are gonna go bye bye . I would let the public protect herself . When seconds count police are only minutes away . Who needs firemen we have fire extinguisher. That's the gun control argument in a nut shell
Re: Better to have than have not
Posted: Jun 8th, 2017, 12:32 pm
by Fancy
Jflem1983 wrote:If I'm ever king . All our gun laws are gonna go bye bye . I would let the public protect herself . When seconds count police are only minutes away . Who needs firemen we have fire extinguisher. That's the gun control argument in a nut shell
Then that argument fails miserably. Hoses and fire extinguishers have failed to put out fires before.
Re: Better to have than have not
Posted: Jun 8th, 2017, 12:51 pm
by Jflem1983
Fancy wrote:Jflem1983 wrote:If I'm ever king . All our gun laws are gonna go bye bye . I would let the public protect herself . When seconds count police are only minutes away . Who needs firemen we have fire extinguisher. That's the gun control argument in a nut shell
Then that argument fails miserably. Hoses and fire extinguishers have failed to put out fires before.
Yep better to be armed I agree
Re: Better to have than have not
Posted: Jun 9th, 2017, 5:42 pm
by the truth
well i and my family are no one's victim, anyone tries breaking into are home,while i am at home will find that out real fast
Re: Better to have than have not
Posted: Jun 10th, 2017, 12:41 pm
by What_the
Unless they know you're armed then you'll find out real fast. You're the one asleep remember?
Re: Better to have than have not
Posted: Jun 10th, 2017, 12:44 pm
by What_the
I agree with the idea that it's better to have and not need than to need and not have.
However, I'm quite happy that if I honk or cut some one off unintentionally some nut job isn't armed and road rages me.
Tire iron? Sure I'll bring mine out too. Lol