Page 1 of 1

Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Nov 30th, 2017, 6:11 pm
by cr125
delete

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Nov 30th, 2017, 6:20 pm
by Jflem1983
God tends to get the bad cyclists. RIP bad cyclists

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Nov 30th, 2017, 7:28 pm
by mexi cali
Does what include bad cyclists?

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Nov 30th, 2017, 7:46 pm
by cr125
read or watch the news concerning what the BC govt is going to do to bad drivers

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Nov 30th, 2017, 7:59 pm
by lightspeed
cr125 wrote:read or watch the news concerning what the BC govt is going to do to bad drivers


Skin them. Salt them. Tear out their innards. Then impale them on stakes.

Hopefully. [icon_lol2.gif]

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Nov 30th, 2017, 8:43 pm
by GordonH
Nail the bad drivers as hard as possible (raise their insurance rate to top level), any that get caught driving while suspended. Instant life long driving ban. Driving is not a right

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Nov 30th, 2017, 10:12 pm
by spooker
In regards to the article about getting tougher with street racers and stunt drivers ... yes, the same applies to cyclists

http://torontosun.com/2017/09/11/cyclist-charged-in-wake-of-wheelie-stunt-ride-video/wcm/ef4ef458-4266-4571-9768-7eb246e34249

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Dec 1st, 2017, 6:38 am
by spooker
Here's something that might provide a new perspective for many ...


Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Dec 1st, 2017, 6:50 am
by cr125
spooker wrote:Here's something that might provide a new perspective for many ...


L.O.L. Stirred the pot again, eh, Spooker [icon_lol2.gif]

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Dec 1st, 2017, 9:34 am
by spooker
cr125 wrote:L.O.L. Stirred the pot again, eh, Spooker [icon_lol2.gif]


If we don't have things to think about we'll just go back to staring at our mobile phones and running people over in the crosswalk ...

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Dec 1st, 2017, 6:26 pm
by cr125
spooker wrote:
cr125 wrote:L.O.L. Stirred the pot again, eh, Spooker [icon_lol2.gif]


If we don't have things to think about we'll just go back to staring at our mobile phones and running people over in the crosswalk ...

Once again, when I was growing up, I was told to look both ways, and listen, before crossing the street/ :smt045 crosswalk, even if the light says walk, does not mean some vehicle or cyclist is going to stop to let you cross, make eye contact with the driver/cyclist, take responsibility for your own actions. WAIT until it is SAFE to cross the street . I was told this at a very young age, and have not forgotten this simple, common sense advice. :smt045

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Dec 1st, 2017, 7:15 pm
by lightspeed
Purple haired yoots are taught that it's ok to wear all black, keep your hood up, stare at their phone, wear headphones, look at the ground, and walk into the road regardless. Because they're entitled to cross the road.

Kids are taught dumb stuff. Different generational attitudes.

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Dec 1st, 2017, 7:18 pm
by cr125
lightspeed wrote:Purple haired yoots are taught that it's ok to wear all black, keep your hood up, stare at their phone, wear headphones, look at the ground, and walk into the road regardless. Becasuse they're entitled to cross the road.

Kids are taught dumb stuff. Different generational attitudes.

Then they deserve what they get, its called weeding out the culls

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Dec 7th, 2017, 9:18 pm
by mexi cali
cr125 wrote:read or watch the news concerning what the BC govt is going to do to bad drivers


How about a link. Or is it supposed to be like an Easter egg hunt ?

Re: Getting tough on bad drivers

Posted: Dec 7th, 2017, 9:30 pm
by mexi cali
spooker wrote:Here's something that might provide a new perspective for many ...



I hate that he refers to it as "omsterdom" and not the accepted North American pronunciation of "Amsterdam" yet he refers to Copenhoggen" as I have always beleived it to be as "copenhaygen".

as for the part where it is difficult to prove that a cyclist is at fault in an accident, that drives me nuts. Can you imagine if the laws here were written so that drivers have to be prepared for the erratic and unpredictable behavior of the squeegee crews or the meth heads who run around in and out of traffic as though they were protected due to stupidity? Because that is what the law there amounts to. Protection of the idiot masses.