47395
45615

WTC Building #7

Conspiracy theories and weird science discussions.

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby Fancy » Jul 26th, 2017, 9:31 pm

Who is Simon Falkner and Chris Sarns?
User avatar
Fancy
The Pilgrim
 
Posts: 43029
Likes: 933 posts
Liked in: 4833 posts
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 5:23 pm

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby Passion4Truth » Jul 27th, 2017, 9:15 am

Your standard method of googling "Debunk" and blindly believing everything you find, not working for you today?
Strange times are these in which we live
 when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. 
And the one man that dares to tell the truth 
is called at once a lunatic and fool 

-- Plato. 

Passion4Truth
Übergod
 
Posts: 1024
Likes: 47 posts
Liked in: 113 posts
Joined: Jan 19th, 2010, 12:22 pm
Location: The physical plane for now

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby Fancy » Jul 27th, 2017, 10:14 am

Passion4Truth wrote:Your standard method of googling "Debunk" and blindly believing everything you find, not working for you today?

You'd be wrong on all counts and I could say the same about you believing the rubbish shoved at you.
User avatar
Fancy
The Pilgrim
 
Posts: 43029
Likes: 933 posts
Liked in: 4833 posts
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 5:23 pm

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby Fancy » Jul 27th, 2017, 10:17 am

maryjane48 wrote:none of that expains near freefall speeds which nist admited was observed
You might explain this paragraph then:

NIST stated that the north face of the building descended 18 stories (the portion of the collapse visible in the video) in 5.4 seconds, based on video analysis of the building collapse. This time period is 40 percent longer than the 3.9 seconds this process would have taken if the north face of the building had descended solely under free fall conditions.
User avatar
Fancy
The Pilgrim
 
Posts: 43029
Likes: 933 posts
Liked in: 4833 posts
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 5:23 pm

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby peaceseeker » Jul 27th, 2017, 11:06 am

Demolition expert, Danny Jowenko, speaks about WTC7...





RIP Danny!!

Last edited by peaceseeker on Jul 28th, 2017, 8:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I think our society is run by insane people for insane objectives...I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends...but I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it."
~ John Lennon
User avatar
peaceseeker
Lord of the Board
 
Posts: 3995
Likes: 380 posts
Liked in: 261 posts
Joined: Sep 11th, 2008, 9:27 am

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby Fancy » Jul 27th, 2017, 11:15 am

Driving from church head on into a tree in 2011 - I'm not so sure he's resting in peace...
User avatar
Fancy
The Pilgrim
 
Posts: 43029
Likes: 933 posts
Liked in: 4833 posts
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 5:23 pm

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby averagejoe » Jul 27th, 2017, 11:50 am

Fancy wrote:Driving from church head on into a tree in 2011 - I'm not so sure he's resting in peace...


Thanks Fancy for restarting this thread.... :130:
"Man is not free unless government is limited." -- Ronald Reagan
User avatar
averagejoe
Walks on Forum Water
 
Posts: 10835
Likes: 2015 posts
Liked in: 1515 posts
Joined: Nov 23rd, 2007, 10:50 pm

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby Fancy » Jul 27th, 2017, 11:59 am

Beats you hijacking the other one plus it wasn't a year old yet...

averagejoe likes this post.
User avatar
Fancy
The Pilgrim
 
Posts: 43029
Likes: 933 posts
Liked in: 4833 posts
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 5:23 pm

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby maryjane48 » Jul 27th, 2017, 12:20 pm

they added the time fancy . they admited to adding the time . there was no verticle movement in the extra time . and when asked to show vertical movement nist could not show it . but when there was verticle movement nist was forced to admit near freefall speeds . near freefall speeds for any length of time be it 1 second or 1 minute still indacate no mass under the mass on top . mass doesnt magical disapear . there was no decleration until the rubble piled up. by then everything above was down . its like taking a rock a dropping it from waist hight. it doesnt slow down until it encounters mass . :smt045
User avatar
maryjane48
Buddha of the Board
 
Posts: 16001
Likes: 9976 posts
Liked in: 2497 posts
Joined: May 28th, 2010, 6:58 pm

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby averagejoe » Jul 28th, 2017, 11:51 am

Here is a clear picture of Bldg # 7 during the collapse of the last tower...

The picture clearly shows no debris on the roof of Bldg # 7 which reports later said causing later in the day it own collapse into it's own footprint.


Image
"Man is not free unless government is limited." -- Ronald Reagan
User avatar
averagejoe
Walks on Forum Water
 
Posts: 10835
Likes: 2015 posts
Liked in: 1515 posts
Joined: Nov 23rd, 2007, 10:50 pm

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby averagejoe » Jul 28th, 2017, 12:11 pm

This aerial photo shows a big gaping hole in the roof of building between the towers and Bldg # 7 and it didn't collapse or burn down?

Image

Another angle of the same building with huge hole..... :135:

Image
"Man is not free unless government is limited." -- Ronald Reagan
User avatar
averagejoe
Walks on Forum Water
 
Posts: 10835
Likes: 2015 posts
Liked in: 1515 posts
Joined: Nov 23rd, 2007, 10:50 pm

Re: WTC Building #7

Postby Fancy » Aug 1st, 2017, 9:15 am

maryjane48 wrote:they added the time fancy . they admited to adding the time . there was no verticle movement in the extra time . and when asked to show vertical movement nist could not show it . but when there was verticle movement nist was forced to admit near freefall speeds . near freefall speeds for any length of time be it 1 second or 1 minute still indacate no mass under the mass on top . mass doesnt magical disapear . there was no decleration until the rubble piled up. by then everything above was down . its like taking a rock a dropping it from waist hight. it doesnt slow down until it encounters mass . :smt045

I've noticed some posters not getting what's said right so unless you post the relevant links I'll have to discount your recall as you appear not to have read the link about the freefall time.

Official investigators say that after the South Tower fell at 9.59am and the North Tower at 10.28am, the pieces of the rubble did irreparable damage to Building 7, causing it to burn by floor by floor, getting progressively weaker along the way.
The investigation by the Federal Emergency Management Agency said that the collapse was caused by a combination of the damage from the debris - and not the impact of the debris itself- and lacking water in the fire sprinklers throughout the building.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4oWcXiHBX
User avatar
Fancy
The Pilgrim
 
Posts: 43029
Likes: 933 posts
Liked in: 4833 posts
Joined: Apr 15th, 2006, 5:23 pm

Previous

Return to Conspiracies and Weird Science

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests