WTC Building #7

[Fancy]

Who is Simon Falkner and Chris Sarns?

[Passion4Truth]

Your standard method of googling "Debunk" and blindly believing everything you find, not working for you today?

[Fancy]

Your standard method of googling "Debunk" and blindly believing everything you find, not working for you today?

You'd be wrong on all counts and I could say the same about you believing the rubbish shoved at you.

[Fancy]

none of that expains near freefall speeds which nist admited was observed

You might explain this paragraph then:

NIST stated that the north face of the building descended 18 stories (the portion of the collapse visible in the video) in 5.4 seconds, based on video analysis of the building collapse. This time period is 40 percent longer than the 3.9 seconds this process would have taken if the north face of the building had descended solely under free fall conditions.

[peaceseeker]

Demolition expert, Danny Jowenko, speaks about WTC7...





RIP Danny!!

[Fancy]

Driving from church head on into a tree in 2011 - I'm not so sure he's resting in peace...

[averagejoe]

Driving from church head on into a tree in 2011 - I'm not so sure he's resting in peace...

Thanks Fancy for restarting this thread....

[Fancy]

Beats you hijacking the other one plus it wasn't a year old yet...

[maryjane48]

they added the time fancy . they admited to adding the time . there was no verticle movement in the extra time . and when asked to show vertical movement nist could not show it . but when there was verticle movement nist was forced to admit near freefall speeds . near freefall speeds for any length of time be it 1 second or 1 minute still indacate no mass under the mass on top . mass doesnt magical disapear . there was no decleration until the rubble piled up. by then everything above was down . its like taking a rock a dropping it from waist hight. it doesnt slow down until it encounters mass .

[averagejoe]

Here is a clear picture of Bldg # 7 during the collapse of the last tower...

The picture clearly shows no debris on the roof of Bldg # 7 which reports later said causing later in the day it own collapse into it's own footprint.

[averagejoe]

This aerial photo shows a big gaping hole in the roof of building between the towers and Bldg # 7 and it didn't collapse or burn down?



Another angle of the same building with huge hole.....

[Fancy]

they added the time fancy . they admited to adding the time . there was no verticle movement in the extra time . and when asked to show vertical movement nist could not show it . but when there was verticle movement nist was forced to admit near freefall speeds . near freefall speeds for any length of time be it 1 second or 1 minute still indacate no mass under the mass on top . mass doesnt magical disapear . there was no decleration until the rubble piled up. by then everything above was down . its like taking a rock a dropping it from waist hight. it doesnt slow down until it encounters mass .

I've noticed some posters not getting what's said right so unless you post the relevant links I'll have to discount your recall as you appear not to have read the link about the freefall time.

Official investigators say that after the South Tower fell at 9.59am and the North Tower at 10.28am, the pieces of the rubble did irreparable damage to Building 7, causing it to burn by floor by floor, getting progressively weaker along the way.
The investigation by the Federal Emergency Management Agency said that the collapse was caused by a combination of the damage from the debris - and not the impact of the debris itself- and lacking water in the fire sprinklers throughout the building.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4oWcXiHBX

[Fancy]

Gotta love this article:

What 9/11 truthers do during a pandemic

https://www.designworldonline.com/what- ... -pandemic/