Evidence of Revision

[peaceseeker]

Some videos everyone should take the time to watch...

Evidence of Revision

'This is the mindblowing 5-part video documentary series Evidence of Revision whose purpose is to present the publicly unavailable and even suppressed historical audio, video and film recordings largely unseen by the American and world public relating to the assassination of the Kennedy brothers, the little known classified "Black Ops" actually used to intentionally create the massive war in Viet Nam, the CIA "mind control" programs and their involvement in the RFK assassination and the Jonestown massacre and other important truths of our post-modern time. The U.S. Government's Orwellian "Office of Public Diplomacy" has been in existence in various forms and under various names since World War ONE. The union of American governance and American corporate interests began in Abraham Lincoln's day and the massaging of "public truth" began even before the Roman Empire. The more you know about "real history" versus "official history", the better equipped you are to see behind the lies of our times, even as they are told to you. Evidence of Revision sweeps "official truth" into the dustbin of history as it may be revised even as it is being written.

Each part cca 100 min. long, 8 hours all together. A must see for everyone...'

Part 1: The assassinations of Kennedy and Oswald as never seen before
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 355447870#

Part 2: The "Why" of it all referenced to Viet Nam and LBJ
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 269105967#

Part 3: LBJ, Hoover and others. What so few know even today.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 204169083#

Part 4: The RFK assassination as never seen before
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... =en&emb=1#

Part 5: The RFK assassination continued, MK ULTRA and the Jonestown massacre... all related.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 777778333#

[westsidebud]

cool, i will watch part 1 tonight , even though we all know jfk died so the vietnam war could go on

[peaceseeker]

cool, i will watch part 1 tonight , even though we all know jfk died so the vietnam war could go on

Yes, I believe that was one of the reasons.

It's absolutely amazing how archived history has been revised to support various 'official stories'.

[westsidebud]

yes and in that doc, isnt it funny its bill oreilly doing the reporting lol, now he is fox stooge lol

[babybunnies]

cool, i will watch part 1 tonight , even though we all know jfk died so the vietnam war could go on

In one of JFK's biggest speeches, he says "we go to the moon, and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard".

I've ALWAYS wondered what he meant by "do the other things". I've always been pretty sure that he was about to tell the world something he shouldn't have and this is why he was assassinated.

Personally, I think the Viet Nam war would have continued with or without Kennedy, as it's not usually the President that makes such decisions - it's usually beyond his control. It wasn't Roosevelt's decision to enter World War II, the Japanese made that decision for him by bombing Pearl Harbor (even if it WAS after US provocation by a Naval blockade of Japan). I think Viet Nam was also along these lines for Kennedy.

However, IF he was about to reveal something about MAJESTIC-12, which I think was probably more likely, or the worldwide banking conspiracy, or suggest something like a return to debt free currency, any of these ideas probably was what got him assassinated.

[babybunnies]

cool, i will watch part 1 tonight , even though we all know jfk died so the vietnam war could go on

Yes, I believe that was one of the reasons.

It's absolutely amazing how archived history has been revised to support various 'official stories'.

Yup. Apparently in France they are teaching their school kids that General De Gaulle was a "brilliant military strategist" who defeated the Nazis.

One day, they'll be teaching that the Bush family was a "political dynasty that overcame the threat of Radical Islamic Terrorism on behalf of the Free World".

I wonder how much we will know of history in 10, 20, 50 or 100 years once the revisionists have had their say. Hold on to those old school history text books and hard copy encyclopaedias. Someday, the information in them will be changed. If you have any of these books printed before the "free information" age, all the better. I put "free information" in quotes, because as we all know, the "free flow" of information is really an illusion that the masses have bought into.

[peaceseeker]

[theyeti]

check out www.topdocumentaryfilms.com for lots more like evidence of revision

[GenesisGT]

I have watched the following video...

Part 1: The assassinations of Kennedy and Oswald as never seen before
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 355447870#


I do have one question, the picture of the person speaking below is represented as a cop who was on duty in Dallas during the assassination and the fact that they show the video in black and white, indicates they are trying to portray the interview was from the 1960s.

The problem I have, and I have checked with two authorities on microphones is that the lapel microphone he is wearing would not have been available until well into the 1990's, so if that is the cop on duty during the assassination, I would guess he would be in his early 20s at a minimum, at the time of the assassination, he would then have to be in his 50s when the interview was done. He neither looks like he is in his 50s, and why would they record the interview in black and white, when color recording would have been available.

Looks like who ever made the video is falsifying eye witness reports, so watching the rest of the videos would be a waste of time.

Looks like we know who the Revisionist are.

And if you have questions about microphones look at all the news clips and the microphones in use at that time, that is what led me to question the interview with the cop.

[peaceseeker]

http://forums.castanet.net/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=26859#p1354674

Gimme a break, GT. The footage is from an interview conducted by Lincoln Karle in April 1974 - it's included in the documentary, 'Two Men in Dallas', released in 1976 and produced by attorney Mark Lane, author of Rush to Judgement (1966)...so, you had better check your 'two authorities on microphones'.

Here's the film - Parts 1-5...

Two Men in Dallas


Parts 2-5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFEx8hjD8kE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hygDvRpam_w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6vXeg50rjs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COKE8gVTOuU


He also gave testimony to David Belin on April 1, 1964...
http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/craig.htm


Btw, you're a prime candidate to learn why we react as we do to the term 'conspiracy theorist'.

CIA Document 1035-960
Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report
http://www.jfklancer.com/CIA.html

Mark Crispin Miller notes the above linked unclassified CIA Memo in the early minutes of the below video...