September 11

[vinnied]

http://www.911myths.com/html/pentagon_rings_and_the_exit_ho.html

http://www.popularmechanics.com/militar ... -pentagon/

http://www.historycommons.org/context.j ... planations

Sometimes things happen that just won't have an explanation to satisfy everyone.

Its not that it doesn't have an explanation to satisfy everyone, its that it doesn't have an explanation at all, just lots of theories. From the link you posted, this is my favorite

“The 182,000-pound aircraft was morphing into an enormous mass of energy and matter, plowing forward like a horizontal volcanic eruption.” It continues, “As the mass traveled through the building, it began to resemble a shaped charge, a form of explosive that funnels its force into a small, directed area—like a beam of energy—in order to punch holes through armor or other strong material.”

Well at least someone out there agrees the hole in the C ring resembles that of an explosive shape charge.

[Fancy]

...which confirms there was a plane.

Witnesses attest to the fact it was a plane and what airline it was from. Don't forget the responders who rushed to the site stepping on debris from the plane.

[ValB58]

That's odd. I have viewed uncountable videos, lectures and literature on this subject with the authors and speakers being professionals of their fields and it hasn't cost me a penny.

Are you a professional in any of these fields involved? Are you qualified to even suggest their research is not credible?

Just look at the source and then watch for the obvious "editing and outtakes" from these "pay-per-click" websites.

[Passion4Truth]

Good job, a great straw man argument. lol

......and be careful what you click on Castanet, there are advertisements here.....

[ValB58]

Deleted by poster.

[Passion4Truth]

I have heard of pay per click advertising, but I am not sure I know of any of your pay per click sites. As I said, good straw man argument. Just another one of your ludicrous statements.

[ValB58]

Deleted by poster.

[Passion4Truth]

Don't be a cry baby. You are the one who can not prove your point about ALL the information coming from so called pay per click sites. lol I am sure you have some ridiculous retort that involves name calling, because, let's face it, it is all you can come up with. Straw man arguments and name calling, good for you. Good luck winning a debate like that.

[ValB58]

Deleted by poster.

[Passion4Truth]

Not calling you a "straw man", you have a straw man argument. [although I did call you a cry baby :) ]

You are insinuating this pay per click site schtick of yours and I said I know of pay per click advertising only and it is all over the net.

I asked if you were a professional in any of the fields involved where as you were qualified to say the research of said professionals was not credible and I get the pay per click site schtick. I am not a professional in any of these fields either, but I am not trying to debunk the professionals and I know the reality of this scenario would include the need for the perpetrators to have the faculties to produce misinformation and disinformation to debunk all the research refuting the official story.

Anyone can google “debunk”. Showing that you can do so, does not infer intelligence.

[ValB58]

Deleted by poster.

[Passion4Truth]

Gee, thanks, but I think it is clear for everyone here upon whom needs the simplifying. lol

[ValB58]

Deleted by poster.

[Passion4Truth]

Oh yes, so much help for everyone to understand you, lol

[ValB58]

Deleted by poster.