September 11

[Fancy]

Drones don't carry passengers.

[Fancy]

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Unite ... h_Evidence
Helicoptor reporter stated a Boeing.

[GenesisGT]

UA73, positively radar identified, professional pilot confirms UA 767-200 with the controller, controller visually spots aircraft and watches it fly into WTC2, all recorded. CT response it was a military drone.

When did this come out, how many days or years after 9/11, just so they could get the story straight. It must of been the only thing that was positively identified long after the fact.

It's always been there, the only place you won't find it, is on CT websites.

[zyzzx]

Doesn't mean it wasn't a drone.

Well, one small step at a time. At least now you have admited it was not a military plane. Good job.

Now lets look at the evidence that there were bodies in the seats of passangers wos identies matched the manifests for the planes that are claimed to have hit the buildings on 911. These manifests are filed prior to the planes taking off... so... ummm...

[kompili]

No one seen bodies in the plane, how could they, there were no windows.

[kompili]

Doesn't mean it wasn't a drone.

Well, one small step at a time. At least now you have admited it was not a military plane. Good job.
evidence that there were bodies in the seats of passangers wos identies matched the manifests for the planes that are claimed to have hit the buildings on 911. These manifests are filed prior to the planes taking off... so... ummm...

I did not admit any thing. It was a military plane, and there was no proof that there were bodies in the plane.

[kompili]

[goatboy]

I did not admit any thing. It was a military plane, and there was no proof that there were bodies in the plane.

Why would they use a military plane? Why not paint one to look like a United jet? They would have know thousands of people would have seen the second plane.

[goatboy]

When you watch that land it's actually hard to see the windows until it turns off the runway and interesting how grey it looks. Whose point are you trying to make?

[kompili]

Just a simple mistake in words, I think not. It was all planned.

[GenesisGT]

Why do they make a big thing about the transponder being turned off, the airplane was still being tracked on radar from it's departure point where the passengers/crew and terrorists boarded to where it crashed into the WTC.

Transponders have nothing to do with whether an airplane can be tracked on radar or not.

[goatboy]

How about you answer my question instead of linking to another stupid CT video?

[Fancy]

While heading a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) probe into the collapse of the towers, W. Gene Corley studied the airplane wreckage. A licensed structural engineer with Construction Technology Laboratories, a consulting firm based in Skokie, Ill., Corley and his team photographed aircraft debris on the roof of WTC 5, including a chunk of fuselage that clearly had passenger windows. "It's ... from the United Airlines plane that hit Tower 2," Corley states flatly. In reviewing crash footage taken by an ABC news crew, Corley was able to track the trajectory of the fragments he studied--including a section of the landing gear and part of an engine--as they tore through the South Tower, exited from the building's north side and fell from the sky.

http://www.southerncrossreview.org/41/9-11.htm

[vinnied]

Why do they make a big thing about the transponder being turned off, the airplane was still being tracked on radar from it's departure point where the passengers/crew and terrorists boarded to where it crashed into the WTC.

Transponders have nothing to do with whether an airplane can be tracked on radar or not.

by switching off the transponders, the planes became bogies. which given the fact that war games were going on that day, they wouldn't be able to tell if the flights were real or simulated.
google operation "vigilant guard"
OPERATION VIGILANT GUARDIAN: This exercise simulated hijacked planes in the north eastern sector. Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins, NORAD unit's airborne control and warning officer, was overseeing the exercise. At 8:40am she took a call from Boston Center which said it had a hijacked airliner. Her first words, as quoted by Newhouse News Service were, "It must be part of the exercise"

[GenesisGT]

Why do they make a big thing about the transponder being turned off, the airplane was still being tracked on radar from it's departure point where the passengers/crew and terrorists boarded to where it crashed into the WTC.

Transponders have nothing to do with whether an airplane can be tracked on radar or not.

by switching off the transponders, the planes became bogies. which given the fact that war games were going on that day, they wouldn't be able to tell if the flights were real or simulated.
google operation "vigilant guard"
OPERATION VIGILANT GUARDIAN: This exercise simulated hijacked planes in the north eastern sector. Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins, NORAD unit's airborne control and warning officer, was overseeing the exercise. At 8:40am she took a call from Boston Center which said it had a hijacked airliner. Her first words, as quoted by Newhouse News Service were, "It must be part of the exercise"

Not sure where you get your information about radar,

they wouldn't be able to tell if the flights were real or simulated

but honestly that statement makes no sense.