Castanet

Kumaran wrote:Yes I will invest in real scientists. Keshe and Searl are real scientists. Mainstream science is fake science created by the elite which suppresses free energy and antigravity.

Boy, do have that right.

Free energy and antigravity is real whatever you say. Both John Searl and Mehran Keshe will be vindicated.

Great article here http://abundanthope.net/pages/Environme ... nter.shtml .

This one might be better:

Warp Field Mechanics 101

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi. ... 016932.pdf

Antigravity would be cool. I wonder if Searl has given any thought to food replicators and transporter pads.

Nebula wrote:Searle is another crackpot. Free energy. Uh huh.

I don't know anything about this "World Peace Invitation" but as for the existence of non meterable energy well




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKYSs18oVts

Without posting youtubes, can anyone describe exactly what free energy is suppose to be about. I know it has nothing to do with perpetual motion.

Fancy wrote:Without posting youtubes, can anyone describe exactly what free energy is suppose to be about. I know it has nothing to do with perpetual motion.

Can't exactly but many of the ideas center around harnessing the energy that powers the world /Universe. Some of these are "freer" than others as some require "power" to access them(ie geothermal).....but what if that power was generated through wind/solar/tide/etc.Others use magnetics which are said to use less energy than they produce(shifting polarities?).Then there is what Tesla was working on which is harnessing the "static electricity" that is all around us. Personally, I don't know if the answer relies on any one theory/application. What I do know is that there are far better/cleaner/cheaper/better/right ways to power our world than is being used now(and the answer to why is easy to see).

sanfish wrote:Can't exactly but many of the ideas center around harnessing the energy that powers the world /Universe. Some of these are "freer" than others as some require "power" to access them(ie geothermal).....but what if that power was generated through wind/solar/tide/etc.Others use magnetics which are said to use less energy than they produce(shifting polarities?).Then there is what Tesla was working on which is harnessing the "static electricity" that is all around us. Personally, I don't know if the answer relies on any one theory/application. What I do know is that there are far better/cleaner/cheaper/better/right ways to power our world than is being used now(and the answer to why is easy to see).

The "Readers Digest" version of the above quote = 0

What would happen if; humans harvested all magnetic materials on Earth and moved them to locations around the globe to supply mankind's need for "free energy"?
Wouldn't that human act cause a magnetic, polar shift?
At what price does "free energy" now really cost mankind?
Just a simple questions like, "Which direction would all the migratory birds fly when winter set in over the Southern hemisphere?" or "In which direction would the Equator now be located?" How would the time zones be adjusted? Would a polar shift cause Seasons to be altered? Would I need to upgrade my GPS?.......Again?

sanfish wrote:Can't exactly but many of the ideas center around harnessing the energy that powers the world /Universe. Some of these are "freer" than others as some require "power" to access them(ie geothermal).....but what if that power was generated through wind/solar/tide/etc.Others use magnetics which are said to use less energy than they produce(shifting polarities?).Then there is what Tesla was working on which is harnessing the "static electricity" that is all around us. Personally, I don't know if the answer relies on any one theory/application. What I do know is that there are far better/cleaner/cheaper/better/right ways to power our world than is being used now(and the answer to why is easy to see).

You're talking about something completely different to what "free energy" believers would have us think is real. You're talking about green energy, and I fully believe and support that. This technology gets it's power from an existing energy source (solar, hydro, geothermal) and converts it into a different energy we can use, but in the process, the energy required to produce is more than the energy coming out.

Free energy believers would have you believe they were able to create more energy than was used to make it. Not possible.

Fancy wrote:Without posting youtubes, can anyone describe exactly what free energy is suppose to be about. I know it has nothing to do with perpetual motion.

Some people call sunlight 'free energy'. It's free, as in it doesn't cost money to get sunlight, as opposed to gasoline. That is not what we are talking about, however.

Free energy in the other sense is exactly along the lines of a perpetual motion machine -- the belief that you can basically create energy out of nothingness. The fatal flaw with this type of free energy is that it goes against the laws of physics.

Nebula wrote:Some people call sunlight 'free energy'. It's free, as in it doesn't cost money to get sunlight, as opposed to gasoline. That is not what we are talking about, however.

Free energy in the other sense is exactly along the lines of a perpetual motion machine -- the belief that you can basically create energy out of nothingness. The fatal flaw with this type of free energy is that it goes against the laws of physics.

Thanks. People have been trying to create perpetual motion machines forever but unsuccessful for a reason. Reminds me of the drinking bird.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_bird

Keshe was right. Faster than light speeds are possible. Einstein was wrong here http://abundanthope....elativity.shtml . Antigravity is also possible. Townsend Brown proved it. Keshe is going to prove it. http://www.awitness....d_of_light.html .
This is the problem that Keshe faces here http://www.padrak.co.../NEN_6_2_1.html ,. The members of the National Philosophy alliance are the real scienrtists. Website is http://www.padrak.co.../NEN_6_2_1.html . These are real scientists.
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAD8AA2990314A621 , http://books.google.lk/books?id=KnzBDjn ... le&f=false , http://www.einsteins-revolution.com/Rep ... manity.pdf .

Did someone get to you? You've done a complete about face from SCAM SCAM SCAM.

http://amasci.com/weird/wsci.html .