Cancer Cure Already Exists

[GenuinelyInterested]

SO.....not enough people believe, and not enough people will $$$ up to those that don't believe in the science to disprove it. What does that tell you?

[Roadster]

If all dollars were divied up to pharma and natural substances of interest equally there would be a fair chance for both to discover something real and promising. Problem is pharma remains the boss over all studies done because if something natural comes up as a cure first, it is felt all pharma would fail and lots of jobs could be lost.
IMO, that's too bad, we should be offered a cure on the basis of a cure, not what money could or might not be made. It's time natural products were offered the same chance. Even if it was a natural product it would be given in doses so high they would need to be administered under care of professionals but us knowing what they are could put us in preventative mode helping us avoid something like a cancer or heart attack and they worry about that too. Is why some idiot in the US is trying to nix supplements so they can't be made in the US. We lose if he wins.
Some say Vit C could be the simple answer to some cancer types. If we had a cancer hit us it would take such high doses to cure us if it was able to do so. Vit C has been found to kill serious life threatening lung infections,,, did the hospitals agree? No they fought the very families trying to save their loved ones and some have died during the fight, yet some who's families won and the treatment was administered lived. (((Administered by professionals in the hospital))) so what was so bad about using it if the patient lived to talk about his near death experience?
Many have died of cancer while we might have had a cure right under our noses that just needs to be studied for safety, the fear is it might be ten times safer and once that option shows it's head, we will all opt for it,,, no more metals and chemicals and radiation that kill good and bad cells for us. We could kill only the bad cells and live a normal life without fear of the cancer returning to attack the dead stuff those treatments leave in our bodies. I really believe that's why the rate of living past five years is so low.
Do we eat Vit C? Yes in small doses so our body knows it, it could probably handle it in high doses and most other natural products as well. Do we eat or take in platinum and other creepy metals and chemicals? No so that why it kills our good cells too! And that stuff comes in at high doses too. It makes you sick, it makes you swell up, you loose your ability to taste, it makes you loose your appetite which is a very bad thing during cancer, some of them leave you with "a promise" of other illnesses to follow like liver disease, neuropathy, kidney issues,,,, hair loss,,, whats that tell you? Do natural products do all that? Radiation is meant to aggressively kill everything on and around the tumor and chemo makes its home in your whole body, not just the tumor site like we would like to think.
A friend of mine just took the chemo treatment about a month ago and she has numbness in her feet and fingers, a weird little ridge in all of her finger and thumb nails that are growing evenly away from the root showing she was quite stressed during that time and hair loss still with other side effects. she only had three treatments of chemo and all that showed up, then they tell her she needs radiation to follow. Now she will face bowel issues as well as possibly bladder issues and what ever else is damaged in radiation. If she stays cured of the cancer she will suffer other illnesses and issues, Maybe never feel the floor under her feet again or be able to tell which is an orange or and apple with her eyes closed and that's not all,,, this numbness could turn into a miserable life long pain issue to her extremities.
Some chemo treatments for your type of cancer will make you throw up violently and become quite medical over the duration of the injections and you need to be in hospital for that for monitoring, some are lighter and still cause issues but not as bad, so what do they suggest first? They suggest the most painful and sickening one first, if you fidget in your chair during this discussion they will tell you about the treatment with less side effects,,, ha! it's too bad we don't have control over our own health and a choice to die without cancer in this day. But we do,,, we have to start studying it ourselves and try to prevent disease.
The government approves chemicals in our food, they control cigarette and booze sales and then they slam us with their choice of what they call a possible cure. We just took a step backward on medical marijuana and yet if it couldn't cure as they claim, it can help by causing an appetite and helping with pain management at the least which wouldn't be a bad thing for a cancer patient. CANT MAKE MONEY ON POT HUH? If they ever figure out how we will be allowed to use it, till then,,,

[Thinktank]

A cure for cancer exists

A clean-up for Hanford exists too. We can spend the next hundred years and $hundreds
of billions of dollars cleaning up Hanford ( the world's dirtiest place) or even better, we could have
just not contaminated the area in the first place.

Things that are natural are cool. The inside kernel of an apricot pit tastes like it has something
good for you in small amounts. Or how about Carnivora - the 100 percent absolutely PURE PHYTONUTRIENT EXTRACT and CAPSULE of Dionaea Muscipula, the particular species of the venus flytrap plant.
http://www.carnivora.com/about-carnivora.html
I would load up on carrot juice, with lots of garlic, celery, and other organic green vegetables mixed in.

The problem is - all these natural 'cures' for cancer work slowly - so slowly that sometimes people still
die from cancer while they're being cured. People want things fast. Instant money machines. Aspirin for headaches.
We pay our bills and send email just by clicking. The pharmaceutical/medical industry does things so fast, they
never get rid of the cause of the problem, but that's what people want. People want it fast.

But the best way to cure cancer is to prevent it. Calculate how much money it would cost
to 'get' cancer, and how much money is lost when someone dies too soon from cancer, and spend
that amount of money preventing cancer in the first place. If good health is worth $1 million dollars,
then don't go screwing it up, just to earn a few lousy $thousand dollars, like the farmers in Punjab,
who use ten times more pesticides than anywhere else, because they want more money so badly,
and now they're filling up cancer trains full of people from the villages, going to get treated for cancer.

Buy the best food you can get - don't go cheap
when it comes to food. Avoid stress. Try to be happy. Don't expose yourself to toxic chemicals.
Get some exercise. Don't work too hard for too long. Take a vacation. And prayer.



.

[Bsuds]

And prayer.

Yup, that'll cure you!

[Thinktank]

I was talking about prevention. Scientific studies proved prayer helps.

- and I'm going to get two or three of my own emoticons, saved on a notepad file,
to let them run free on this forum.

[Fancy]

I was talking about prevention. Scientific studies proved prayer helps.

haven't run across that one yet:

Prayers offered by strangers had no effect on the recovery of people who were undergoing heart surgery, a large and long-awaited study has found.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/31/healt ... d=all&_r=0

[Roadster]

I was talking about prevention. Scientific studies proved prayer helps.

Prayer will help some just like laughter for others or meditation or certain types of music for some. Its a personal preference, to each his/her own and all things positive to a person who is with cancer will help. Those who dont choose to do something that makes them feel closer to god, or to the joy of laughter or music or even a hobby they could enjoy or to have positive people around them are the ones who find it hard to fight such a terrible disease. I doubt it has much to do with prayer itself but more to do with the comfort some may feel by doing so.
I guess I am saying people who pray or are religious still die of the same diseases the rest who dont pray and are not religious can die of. There is no proof they would live longer or survive a disease any better or suffer less then someone who has some other type of positive surroundings to help them fight such a thing. Thing to do when you are ill is find anything that makes you feel happy and drop what might have caused you to become ill and keep positive friends and family near you if you can. Better yet try to find that happy, healthy place in your life before you become ill, might avoid it altogether just by dancing your way to 98.

[Thinktank]

We're cheap.

Years of full throttle chemical farming has depleted the soil, resulting in
less nutritious food, and more pesticide residues. GMOs are even worse - they
are showing more and more health problems.

That less nutritious food is shipped great distances, which requires more pesticides
to allow the food to keep. We like getting stuff where labour is cheap. We don't care
how far it travelled. we don't care what pesticides are on it.

The less nutritious food is processed, removing even more nutrition. 80% of the nutrition
is removed from white flour, during milling. Sugar has no nutrition. The least nutritious food
is then put ON SALE and promoted by the grocery chains. we consume this less nutritious food like
it was goi9ng out of style. MSG - a chemical additive makes some of the least nutritious food addictive,
so we eat more of it.

The number of overweight or obese children has doubled in the last twenty years to 30%. In twenty five years,
70% of Canaians will be overweight.

Fast food is loaded with chemical additives - one-quarter of Canadians reported they had eaten something from a fast-food outlet in the last 24 hours. Fast food is a favourite of poor people. Studies show poor people have more health problems than the rich.

We always talk about a CURE for cancer. We NEVER talk about spending more on health. The richest 1%
own 40% of the nation's wealth. We have $billions of dollars available for wars. And we have $billions
available for treating cancer, but we're cheap when it comes to our food.

[Fancy]

Finding cures for various cancers should never be taken lightly and the more research done the more optimistic people can be when faced with this terrible disease.

[peaceseeker]

Rumor: New drug shrinks, cures all tumors
April 1, 2013, MSN
http://news.msn.com/rumors/rumor-new-dr ... all-tumors

Researchers say they have created a drug that has killed every kind of cancer tumor it has come in contact with, according to Science Magazine. The antibody treatment works by blocking a protein called CD47 which tricks the body into not destroying cancerous cells. After the protein is blocked, the body can then recognize the cancer cells as invaders and attack. While the research is seen as a step closer to discovering a treatment that can cure all cancers, the drug has only been tested on mice and will need to prove itself on humans before it can be available to patients. This may take a few years. The research team has been given the green light and recently received a four-year, $20 million grant to conduct human clinical trials. Research for this new drug started a decade ago when biologist Irving Weissman at Stanford University was studying leukemia cells. He found that that leukemia cells produce higher levels of the CD47 protein than healthy cells. CD47 acts as a "don't-eat-me" signal, instructing the body to not eat harmful cells. Cancers take advantage of this signal to trick the immune system into ignoring them. Weissman's research showed that blocking CD47 can cure more than just blood cancers. The drug can also shrink or cure human breast, ovary, colon, bladder, brain, liver and prostate tumors that have been transplanted into mice. The treatment forced the mice's immune system to kill the cancer cells. This means this single drug could cure a variety of cancers and prevent cancers from spreading in the body.

Note: With many millions around the world dying of cancer every year, why aren't the most promising treatments being fast-tracked? Why is this article titled a "rumor"? Why isn't this making major headlines? Why isn't the very promising treatment of DCA, which is both cheap and incredibly promising, being given many millions to move rapidly forward? To read major media articles describing other potential cures not being adequately funded, click here. To understand why some treatments are suppressed, click here.

[John500]

What gets me is the fact that with all the fundraising, approx 35% goes to research. The other 65% goes to keeping the Canadian Cancer Agency in tact. The CEO makes something like over $300.00 a year? I could be wrong.
With all the funds raised, how much further are we compaired to 30 years ago?

[Roadster]

Not by much John, the treatments being used are mostly from back 30 years ago or so. I have to wonder if all the funds raised just go to nothing but reviewing the old stuff.
I wish the moneys use was monitored by someone to see if we should even fund raise or donate anymore. Seems no news on something looking anymore promising has ever come and we continue to see people die after intensive treatments.
Why are we not doing or even studying what they do in places like Mexico? Seems they have better results then we do. Why is there no natural cures being studied? Oh right, because if we got better on our own there might not be a need for their stuff,,,? I believe their stuff is only a small extension on life, maybe a year or up to 5 and then we are another number for statistics. I also think they are afraid to move on to somethng new because it Might actually kill cancer, bets are they know there is something but we fund raise anyway with the highest hopes to be told something suddenly showed up and it works and we can actually be saved, meanwhile we have lost moms, brothers, sisters, and husbands and wives, oh and little children much too early for all the wrong reasons,,,,

[Thinktank]

The cure for cancer already exists. It's to not get cancer in the first place.

We know adding tons of chemical preservatives and pesticides on our food is bad.
We also know GMOs aren't looking very safe right now. So why don't we cure cancer by
subsidizing health? Why do we subsidize and pay $billions for sickness?

[Roadster]

The cure for cancer already exists. It's to not get cancer in the first place.

We know adding tons of chemical preservatives and pesticides on our food is bad.
We also know GMOs aren't looking very safe right now. So why don't we cure cancer by
subsidizing health? Why do we subsidize and pay $billions for sickness?

Avoiding cancer is not always possible, some babies are born with it even before chemicals in food could cause it. Its about DNA, we all have it in a way so to speak and then in some people it becomes active for some reason. We have to make sure we dont trigger it yes, but you cant know you wouldnt get it because you chose a healthy life style. It hits athletes as it does anyone else. Might even have lots to do with what you do for work. What you said is not the cure but could be a preventative for many. You dont get it from careless sex or kissing people or on the wind.
Your body might be fighting stress when it shows up with cancer. There are many variables that cause it and we should surely find a cure before we could pin point what causes it. We know there is a way to kill it. We just arent being told what it is. They want to hold us sick in care so there will always be work and income. A cure would kill pharma.