The dirt cheap way to get healthy and not get the flu
- Bpeep
- Mindquad
- Posts: 29026
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2008, 10:05 am
Re: The dirt cheap way to get healthy and not get the flu
Once a year, I get a homeless guy to spit in a cup.
I take it home, microwave it, (effectively killing it) stir the sputum into a beverage, and consume it.
I havent had a flu in over twenty years.
Works great, and its free. No sore arm either.
I take it home, microwave it, (effectively killing it) stir the sputum into a beverage, and consume it.
I havent had a flu in over twenty years.
Works great, and its free. No sore arm either.
Seeking the apartment that is creating leasing interest concerns knowledgeable seclusive morons excessively.
- Roadster
- Time waster at work
- Posts: 39664
- Joined: Mar 21st, 2009, 8:57 am
Re: The dirt cheap way to get healthy and not get the flu
GAG!
♥ You and 98 other users LIKE this post
- Bpeep
- Mindquad
- Posts: 29026
- Joined: Mar 1st, 2008, 10:05 am
Re: The dirt cheap way to get healthy and not get the flu
Oh, get over it. Its dead, killed by microwaves.
No different than a flu shot.
And it immunizes you against local ailments, not just the ones Big Pharma thinks you might get.
No different than a flu shot.
And it immunizes you against local ailments, not just the ones Big Pharma thinks you might get.
Seeking the apartment that is creating leasing interest concerns knowledgeable seclusive morons excessively.
-
- Walks on Forum Water
- Posts: 11112
- Joined: Jul 30th, 2009, 12:10 am
Re: The dirt cheap way to get healthy and not get the flu
We Have Been Conditioned To See Only What They Want Us To See.
- zyzzx
- Fledgling
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Feb 14th, 2012, 7:44 pm
Re: The dirt cheap way to get healthy and not get the flu
kompili wrote:
Lol...
The average age in 1853 was under 40 years of age, today it is in the high 70's.
Someone with a grade school Education should be able to figure out a couple of things with data like that.
As for Cancer.. Feel free to research, or don't. No matter to me really, just letting folks know how mis-informed your "Opinion" is.
Hippocrates (ca. 460 BC – ca. 370 BC) described several kinds of cancer, referring to them with the Greek word carcinos (crab or crayfish), among others. This name comes from the appearance of the cut surface of a solid malignant tumour, with "the veins stretched on all sides as the animal the crab has its feet, whence it derives its name". Since it was against Greek tradition to open the body, Hippocrates only described and made drawings of outwardly visible tumors on the skin, nose, and breasts. Treatment was based on the humor theory of four bodily fluids (black and yellow bile, blood, and phlegm). According to the patient's humor, treatment consisted of diet, blood-letting, and/or laxatives. Through the centuries it was discovered that cancer could occur anywhere in the body, but humor-theory based treatment remained popular until the 19th century with the discovery of cells.
The oldest known description and surgical treatment of cancer was discovered in Egypt and dates back to approximately 1600 BC. The Papyrus describes 8 cases of ulcers of the breast that were treated by cauterization, with a tool called "the fire drill." The writing says about the disease, "There is no treatment."[3]
Doing drugs supports crime. Are you happy that you support crime? Just think how much society would save if you didn't support the criminals that are producing drugs. Medicinal? Good on you! That is why the Doctor gave you a prescription.